| Revision as of 02:52, 19 July 2014 editHerbxue (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,206 edits ←Created page with ' https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Acupuncture&diff=617524986&oldid=617518624' | Revision as of 17:49, 27 July 2014 edit undoHerbxue (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,206 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Acupuncture&diff=prev&oldid=617190003 | |||
| :: Editor dismisses concerns about POV wording and misuse of editorial source by asserting fact without in text attribution | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Acupuncture&diff=prev&oldid=617468469 | |||
| :: Editor asserting POV wording against previous compromise (and misusing editorial to assert fact in WP's voice) | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Acupuncture&diff=617524986&oldid=617518624 | https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Acupuncture&diff=617524986&oldid=617518624 | ||
| :: Editor dismisses entire subject as without any value, but continues to edit dismissed subject. | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience&diff=prev&oldid=617924367 | |||
| ::Arguments against depicting "acupuncture is pseudoscience" as fact in WP's voice | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience&diff=prev&oldid=617777489 | |||
| :: Editor insists on presenting opinions as fact, showing obsession with the label pseudoscience | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience&diff=next&oldid=617864915 | |||
| :: Logos gets it | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience&diff=prev&oldid=617846849 | |||
| :: Editor claims strong consensus but does not give evidence | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience&diff=prev&oldid=617843551 | |||
| ::Zambelo gets it | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=617731968 | |||
| ::bobcatmeow on NPOV | |||
Revision as of 17:49, 27 July 2014
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Acupuncture&diff=prev&oldid=617190003
- Editor dismisses concerns about POV wording and misuse of editorial source by asserting fact without in text attribution
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Acupuncture&diff=prev&oldid=617468469
- Editor asserting POV wording against previous compromise (and misusing editorial to assert fact in WP's voice)
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Acupuncture&diff=617524986&oldid=617518624
- Editor dismisses entire subject as without any value, but continues to edit dismissed subject.
- Arguments against depicting "acupuncture is pseudoscience" as fact in WP's voice
- Editor insists on presenting opinions as fact, showing obsession with the label pseudoscience
- Logos gets it
- Editor claims strong consensus but does not give evidence
- Zambelo gets it
- bobcatmeow on NPOV