Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:55, 28 July 2014

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

2013–14 UEFA Champions League knockout phase no.2

Hi. I have told you about it before.....When being in edit conflict do not override reents edits like here. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Saudi league

I can't read Arabic. Why does the OFFICIAL Saudi Pro league website and FIFA say Ettifaq are NOT relegated when they saw Al Shoalah are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weka (talk • contribs) 22:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't know why, however all reliable Arabic sport websites has confirmed that Al-Ittifaq have been relegated from the top flight., , --Uishaki (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

But surely it can't be more official than FIFA and the OFFICIAL SPL website, no? What trumps those two websites? Nothing. Because those are about as official as you can get.... --weka (talk) 23:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

All sources says that Al-Ettifaq (means the agreement) are relegated to the First Division, but only few tables are incorrect.--Uishaki (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Does that matter if the official website says Al Shoulah are relegated. Those sources are unofficial. The official websites says Al Ettifaq are not relegated. Change it back or I will get the higher ups. weka (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Why do you not want to understand that the second club who relegated is Al-Ettifaq not Al-Shoalah, even the players of Ettifaq were crying here . I would not change it, and if you do that i will report you. It is not my problem that you do not know Arabic. I provided ​​many sources while you gave only two.--Uishaki (talk) 00:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Alright, you win. I guess you better tell FIFA.com and the official Saudi league website that they are wrong >_<. Also change this "Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored." because you know better than me. Apologies --weka (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your cooperation and also the advices.--Uishaki (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Arab Jews

I (again) undid your edit at Category:Palestinian Jews. You change a category with another one which is not equal, and not correct in itself. Also, on a procedural note, please not that per WP:BRD you should discuss any edit that is reverted rather than redoing it. Edit warring may lead to sanctions. Debresser (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

your revert

There is a reason for not showing all the villages to certain users!! Read https://en.wikipedia.org/Template_talk:Palestinian_Arab_villages_depopulated_during_the_1948_Palestinian_exodus#Blofeld_stubs

...and please revers, Cheeers, Huldra (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

The problem is in YOUR setup, probably in https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Uishaki/monobook.js

(see https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Huldra/monobook.css for my setup)

If you log out, you will note that all the villages are seen with equal color... It is rather frustrating with editors like you, who come out of the blue and make major changes to a template which you know nothing about, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

ok, I see you have you have edited your . User:Uishaki/monobook.js ,

Now: try to revert your edit on Template:Palestinian Arab villages depopulated during the 1948 Palestinian exodus: (I cannot do it, as I would break 1 RR), and hopefully you will see all articles which are expanded as blue, and the stubs as red. This is an extremely valuable tool for me when I have expanded these articles, basically I know that the "blue" articles (in theory) have all the different sources which I then can copy over to whatever stub I am expanding. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

1 RR

You have broken 1 RR on Ilan Pappé. (See the talk page). If you don´t revert, I will report you. Huldra (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting, Huldra (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Al-Arabi Sc kuwait

umm... excuse me why did you edit Al-Arabi SC when we have 56 trophies and you changed it to 55 and other edits while these events happend this year where they have one the federation cup and the volly ball league in this season and finished fifth this year — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalid sadeq (talk • contribs) 19:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Because you added incorrect sentences and without any sources like

which is said to be renewed to become a much better stadium in the upcoming years but we have not heard from the Kuwait sport and youth federation from them.

--Uishaki (talk) 19:08, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Your recent editing history at Falafel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period) restriction. To avoid remaining in violation, please self-revert. Hertz1888 (talk) 01:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:ARBPIA alert

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 02:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Ayran

Hi. You recently added a category (Arab cuisine) to the Ayran page. Your edit was reverted, removing that category from the page. I then reverted the revert, adding back the category to the page. You then reverted my revert of the first revert, deleting that category from the page. Are you sure you didn't do this in error? If you do want the Arab cuisine category included @ Ayran, then why remove it the next day? Fleetham (talk) 13:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 15:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 2014 Palestine International Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Palestine International Championship is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2014 Palestine International Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 15:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

Your recent editing behavior was brought to my attention via the edit warring noticeboard. After review, I am applying the following sanction:

The following sanction now applies to you:

Effective immediately (that is, at 08:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC)), you are placed under a zero-revert restriction for all articles subject to the existing 1RR authorized by the ARBPIA arbitration case, which is defined as: "any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict... When in doubt, assume is related." This restriction applies for one week and expires at 08:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC).

You have been sanctioned because of your recent editing behavior at at Palestine League and Falafel, in order to prevent any escalation of tensions in this sensitive topic area.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —Darkwind (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Edenc1 • Talk 17:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

AFC Challenge Cup

Afghanistan and Laos did not one score. Why do you think the score is 1-0? Who score? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Younis7435 (talk • contribs) 13:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

According to the AFC Report Afghanistan 0-0 Laos--Uishaki (talk) 13:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Massacres committed by Zionists

Template:Massacres committed by Zionists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 19:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

May 2014

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  — MusikAnimal 00:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ramzi Saleh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Ramzi Saleh''' ({{lang-ar|رمزي صالح}}); born 8 August 1980) is a ] ]. He plays as a [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Night of the Bridges, Battle of Buqqar Ridge, Battle of Beersheba (1917) you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked once for that kind of violations and it's only a matter of time before you are blocked again. Infantom (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

You have violated 1RR

You have violated the one-revert restriction on Battle of Beersheba (1917), Battle of Buqqar Ridge, and Night of the Bridges.

Please self-revert (undo your last edit) or I will report you for the edit-warring violation. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 15:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

You were warned earlier about making bad-faith accusations about other editors' religions. Please stop. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 15:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Personal attack block

I have blocked you for 72 hours for this personal attack. You can use {{unblock}} to request an unblock. See also WP:GAB.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Uishaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What was personal attack with that?? I do not deserve this unfair block. Why always warning and blocking me for tenuous reasons and leave the others User:Noon, User:Infantom, User:Edenc1 involved in this edit conflict free to edit? Just take a look at my contributions and see that i provided sources and wanted to resolve the conflict by dialogue but it was those users who reverted my edits because it was a so called "propaganda" and "bias". I am very disappointed about the job administrators are doing here. Keeping a user who have spent 4 years quiet and barring him from correction of disastrous errors on the history of Arab-Israeli conflict. Honestly I got sources in my native language Arabic for example the Palestinian Information Center so have this been a crime to use sources that one understand. However they never accept it. I don't know what the difference between my and theirs edits. Also see what User:Edenc1 wrote on his talkpage and his removing of stuff on my private userpage because it's "antisemitic". See how many times User:Noon, User:Infantom reverted controversially and the text on their editsummaries. None of them sought fruitful discussion on the talkpage of all articles concerned. I only wants justice and law to be applied on everyone here not just a group.Uishaki (talk) 23:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you honestlyThe claim that you don't see how calling someone a "zionist terrorist" is a personal attack is either entirely disingenious or indicates you aren't suited to edit Misplaced Pages. Regardless of what other people might or might not have done, you made a blatant personal attack, and have been, accordingly, blocked. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Uishaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't call anyone as "zionist terrorist". STOP this fabrication!! I am the most suited person to edit Misplaced Pages instead of those liars. They distort the image of Misplaced Pages. None of them adopt neutrality, just editing for the israeli side and promoting zionist propaganda. See this user AmirSurfLera how he reverts edits without giving any valid reasons. I seeks justice and not punish because I'm anti-Israeli. For example The Bushranger support Israel without any harassment from others. However when I expressed my anti-Israeli feelings, I became involved in an edit conflict with an amateur editor because my frankness irritated him. I seeks justice and punishment to all users who think themselves above the law here. Uishaki (talk) 11:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"I seeks justice and punishment to all users who think themselves above the law here"… well, I'm not sure you understand the purpose of this website. See Misplaced Pages:There is no justice. Misplaced Pages is not for meeting out justice nor punishment, nor for "expressing anti-Israeli feelings" or anti-, or pro- anything else feelings, nor is it for insulting other users. I'm surprised you only got 72 hours, since the personal attack in question was merely the climax of a series of disruptive edits, including egregious 1RR violations. Your requests for unblock are getting worse, too. If you make no attempt to conform to site standards (see Misplaced Pages:Guide to appealing blocks, which you have already been referred to), you will lose access to this page. Bishonen | talk 14:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I've increased your block duration to two weeks from today for block evasion by 81.191.188.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).--Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Uishaki,

Several of our edits are good and others are controversial. You should pay more attention to this and try to get consensus on the talk page.

Anyway, you have an entered in a spiral that will lead you to the indefinite ban if you don't stop this.

Just for yourself, please, respect the "block" conditions and take benefit of this time to rest but don't try to evade your block. You will be caught for sure and this will be doubled in time at each case.

Pluto2012 (talk) 07:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nayef Hawatmeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Operation Protective Edge

Hi Uishaki,

I removed a recent post you made to Talk:Operation Protective Edge since it was more about commenting on the on going conflict rather than improving the article. Please just stick to talking about how to improve the article, that would be helpful and in the spirt of the project. Thanks! --Malerooster (talk) 16:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

==Your userpage==

Hi, Uishaki. Your userpage keeps getting vandalized by dynamic IPs. Would you like me to semiprotect it so that IPs can't edit it? Bishonen | talk 23:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC).

Yes off course.--Uishaki (talk) 23:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Done, after a lot of edit conflicts. The xx.55 IP has been blocked. If they return with another IP, I'll semi this page as well. Bishonen | talk 23:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC).

Semiprotected. Bishonen | talk 23:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC).

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For all your help tonight 5 albert square (talk) 01:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

You have violated 1RR

You have violated the one-revert restriction on Operation Protective Edge.

Please self-revert (undo your last edit) or I will report you for the edit-warring violation. Thank you. Brad Dyer (talk) 21:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Which edit?--Uishaki (talk) 21:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Your last one (where you removed a "see also" link. Brad Dyer (talk) 21:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Block Notice

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   Mike V • Talk 22:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Please note this is for a violation of WP:1RR per the active arbitration remedies.

Uishaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not violated the one revert rule posed on Operation Protective Edge. I only removed wrong IP edits (185.13.202.215, 74.113.190.218, 85.250.79.187, 84.111.144.105 and 99.225.228.149) and those are excluded from this rule. Why are you only punishing me for mistakes committed by the Zionists who wants to own and abuse Misplaced Pages. Most contributes on that article are reverting like me several times the disruptive edits by IPs but as usually you ignors it and wake up only when I fight the vandalism and block me instead of those vandals. Unfortunately, Misplaced Pages has become a toy in the hands of global Zionism. Uishaki (talk) 22:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You did add back the same contentious material, twice within 24 hours, which is exactly what the 1RR restriction is designed to prevent. As to the other blather, it doesn't apply to an unblock so I've ignored. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 23:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Uishaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Once again. I only removed wrong IP edits (185.13.202.215, 74.113.190.218, 85.250.79.187, 84.111.144.105 and 99.225.228.149) and those are excluded from this rule! Is that right or not? Uishaki (talk) 23:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

• Learn something new each day, and hopefully you will as well. Rather than walk away, I took you at good faith and did some digging around. 1RR isn't a common rule we admin have to worry about, and not all 1RR rules are the same in all areas of the encyclopedia. Looking at the original Arb ruling, yes, IPs are exempted although still subject to standard 3RR rules . Note that the last one to revert you was a registered user, so don't revert again today. I'm unblocking you and pinging Mike V. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 00:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

• No, they are not excluded by any stretch of the imagination. Your reverts , and ADDED BACK material that was contentious. You didn't revert vandalism (read WP:VANDAL for what is and isn't vandalism) you were edit warring over content that is very loaded. You were only blocked 24 hours, less than your last edit warring block, so that is pretty kind, if you think about it. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 23:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

@Dennis Brown: Thanks for finding that out and correcting the mistake. 1RR is not something I frequently encounter and I missed the part about IPs being exempt in this specific subset of articles.

Uishaki, I apologize for the error with the block. I do hope that you will consider the spirit of the 1RR rule and raise your concerns on the talk page in the future. I understand that the Arab-Israeli topics can be highly contentious and many of our editors and readers are emotionally, and some even physically, involved in the subject matter. Keeping this in mind, I ask that you be mindful of your contributions to the article, strive to source it reliably, seek the assistance of others to word it neutrally, and encourage others to work collaboratively in a similar fashion. Best, Mike V • Talk 01:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

• • Honestly, I would have made the same mistake, and did on the first unblock review. It is the first 1RR exception I've ever seen with an IP exception. I normally don't patrol I/P articles. Fortunately, his second request wasn't padded with opinion and I took it serious enough to research a bit and was just as shocked as you were. We admins don't know everything, we can't, but we will work together to correct good faith errors when we find them. I think the note I made in the unblock will show that the original block was a good faith error. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 01:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reactions to Operation Protective Edge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy delete nomination - Shuja'iyya massacre

Please see article's talk page for details.

Speedy deletion nomination of Shuja'iyya massacre

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Shuja'iyya massacre, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Jersey92 (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 16:43, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

3RR at Shuja'iyya Incident (2014)

Just a heads up, your at 3 reverts on the description of the incident as a massacre, and have made a number of other reverts to the article in the last 24 hours. Since you haven't been warned, I'll give you a break on the WP:3rr block, but you need to stop reverting and let other people guide the article for awhile. Reverting IPs is exempt from the 1rr rule applicable to Israel-Palestine articles, but is not exempt from the regular 3rr rule. Monty₈₄₅ 01:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Shuja'iyya Incident (2014) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shuja'iyya Incident (2014) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shuja'iyya Incident (2014) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♥ Solarra ♥ ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 05:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Druze sportspeople

I have declined your speedy deletion nomination, because I see no reason to call this a hoax. The Druze are evidently a distinct community. If you think this category should not exist, nominate it at WP:Categories for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

AE

Please see --Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 20:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)