| Revision as of 20:52, 3 July 2006 editER MD (talk | contribs)872 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:39, 3 July 2006 edit undoER MD (talk | contribs)872 edits →Okay, how about this:Next edit → | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :::::No, you're deleting warnings. They had merit and have to stay. <b>] <small><sup> ]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:37 (]) </font> | :::::No, you're deleting warnings. They had merit and have to stay. <b>] <small><sup> ]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:37 (]) </font> | ||
| ::::::I am editing pages. People who disagree can't simply claim vandalism--just like the way I made false claims on your talk page--is it fair that you keep it there? and other people think that you are a vandal? I've written most of lethal injection, shock and awe, a good part of american conservatism, the opinion section on capital punishment(got in a heated debate there and nrcprm2026 was eventually banned from editing), topics on etomidate, valium, pentothal, pentobarbiturate, neuromuscular blockers. Anybody can claim vandalism and throw a claim onto my talk page. They are bogus warnings. The deletion for reaganomics--there is simply an edit war since its all pov there. I probably won't be wasting my time there. Again, all of this stuff is worthless. Don't you have something better to do than police a person's talkpage. I only want it cleaned up and I'm not that good at wiki to figure out how to do an archive... ] 20:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | ::::::I am editing pages. People who disagree can't simply claim vandalism--just like the way I made false claims on your talk page--is it fair that you keep it there? and other people think that you are a vandal? I've written most of lethal injection, shock and awe, a good part of american conservatism, the public opinion section on capital punishment(got in a heated debate there and nrcprm2026 was eventually banned from editing), parts of euthanasia, topics on etomidate, valium, pentothal, pentobarbiturate, neuromuscular blockers. Anybody can claim vandalism and throw a claim onto my talk page. They are bogus warnings. The deletion for reaganomics--there is simply an edit war since its all pov there. I probably won't be wasting my time there. Again, all of this stuff is worthless. Don't you have something better to do than police a person's talkpage. I only want it cleaned up and I'm not that good at wiki to figure out how to do an archive... ] 20:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::Actually, it looks like you deleted it from your talk page! If you are deleting stuff from your page, I'm going to clean up mine. Thanks... ] 20:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | :::::::Actually, '''it looks like you deleted it from your talk page'''! If you are deleting stuff from your page, I'm going to clean up mine. Thanks... ] 20:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::::As for warnings, from my understanding of how wiki works, the administrators have a tool to see how many times that you have been blocked. As for me, I've been blocked 3 times prior (because I get pissed off dealing with not so intelligent people--go read my history with 4 people who claimed that I was not a doctor even when my IP prointed to the hospitals that I worked at--they claimed that I hacked into hospital IP to "falsely" claim that I was a doctor) to getting now blocked 2 times for trying to clean up my talk page. ] 21:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::Finally, the talk page states: "Furthermore WP:VAND states: Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. '''It is generally acceptable to remove misplaced vandalism tags''', as long as the reasoning is solid." | |||
| ::::::::::I have not vandalized any pages except for nrcprm2026 user page prior to that user getting a permanent ban for his behavior. I have contributed to wiki--see above articles--and I am getting real tired of defending myself against baseless accusations. Is there a way that I can tell people not to write on my user talk page? ] 21:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:39, 3 July 2006
Okay, how about this:
Instead of deleting the messages, make an archive of them. Otherwise, they have to stay on this page. --69.145.123.171 18:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- There is nothing on this page worth archiving. Its all junk. ER MD 19:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, but everytime you remove it somebody else will put it back. That's the way it works. 69.145.123.171 Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:06 (UTC)
- according to the talk page: "Others delete comments after they have responded to them." I've responded to the comments and I have opted to delete them. My warning is on deleting entries that have no value. And my block was for deleting unimportant stuff and getting pissed off at people for puting false information on the talk page. ER MD 20:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- No, you're deleting warnings. They had merit and have to stay. 69.145.123.171 Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:37 (UTC)
- I am editing pages. People who disagree can't simply claim vandalism--just like the way I made false claims on your talk page--is it fair that you keep it there? and other people think that you are a vandal? I've written most of lethal injection, shock and awe, a good part of american conservatism, the public opinion section on capital punishment(got in a heated debate there and nrcprm2026 was eventually banned from editing), parts of euthanasia, topics on etomidate, valium, pentothal, pentobarbiturate, neuromuscular blockers. Anybody can claim vandalism and throw a claim onto my talk page. They are bogus warnings. The deletion for reaganomics--there is simply an edit war since its all pov there. I probably won't be wasting my time there. Again, all of this stuff is worthless. Don't you have something better to do than police a person's talkpage. I only want it cleaned up and I'm not that good at wiki to figure out how to do an archive... ER MD 20:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, it looks like you deleted it from your talk page! If you are deleting stuff from your page, I'm going to clean up mine. Thanks... ER MD 20:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- As for warnings, from my understanding of how wiki works, the administrators have a tool to see how many times that you have been blocked. As for me, I've been blocked 3 times prior (because I get pissed off dealing with not so intelligent people--go read my history with 4 people who claimed that I was not a doctor even when my IP prointed to the hospitals that I worked at--they claimed that I hacked into hospital IP to "falsely" claim that I was a doctor) to getting now blocked 2 times for trying to clean up my talk page. ER MD 21:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Finally, the talk page states: "Furthermore WP:VAND states: Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. It is generally acceptable to remove misplaced vandalism tags, as long as the reasoning is solid."
- I have not vandalized any pages except for nrcprm2026 user page prior to that user getting a permanent ban for his behavior. I have contributed to wiki--see above articles--and I am getting real tired of defending myself against baseless accusations. Is there a way that I can tell people not to write on my user talk page? ER MD 21:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Finally, the talk page states: "Furthermore WP:VAND states: Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. It is generally acceptable to remove misplaced vandalism tags, as long as the reasoning is solid."