Misplaced Pages

User talk:ER MD: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:02, 3 July 2006 editER MD (talk | contribs)872 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:23, 3 July 2006 edit undo69.145.123.171 (talk) ehNext edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 30: Line 30:
I have responded to entries and the false claims of vandalism. Go look at my edits for heavens sake! I have responded to entries and the false claims of vandalism. Go look at my edits for heavens sake!
Read the above section--comments on the talk page can be deleted. ] 21:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Read the above section--comments on the talk page can be deleted. ] 21:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

==Breath==

I knew you were going to bring that up, so allow me to explain: warning places accidently or without merit may be taken out-warnings put there for a reason are not supposed to be removed, ever. If you continue, you will be blocked again. The warnings you put on my page had not reason to be there. I can contribute without a username and it's obviously not against policy. And the 3RR rule doesn't apply when dealing with vandalism, which your removing of warnings constitues as. So calm down and stop removing warnings. <b>] <small><sup> ]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 22:22 (]) </font>

Revision as of 22:23, 3 July 2006

MY TALK PAGE POLICY

I respond to all comments. Afterwards, I delete these entries in a few days. I do not like clutter and I think keeping unimportant information is a waste of space. There is very little interesting content in a user's talk page. Reviewing a person's talk page is, in addition, a fruitless venture. Therefore, I will delete all entries and keep a clean page. It is my personal preference and it is supported by wiki policy (see talk page). Some people claim that the talk page is required to see a block log, but all editors have access to see how many times a person has been blocked. I find keeping unimportant information is a worthless endeavor. Thank you. ER MD 22:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Okay, how about this:

Instead of deleting the messages, make an archive of them. Otherwise, they have to stay on this page. --69.145.123.171 18:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

There is nothing on this page worth archiving. Its all junk. ER MD 19:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, but everytime you remove it somebody else will put it back. That's the way it works. 69.145.123.171 Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:06 (UTC)
according to the talk page: "Others delete comments after they have responded to them." I've responded to the comments and I have opted to delete them. My warning is on deleting entries that have no value. And my block was for deleting unimportant stuff and getting pissed off at people for puting false information on the talk page. ER MD 20:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
No, you're deleting warnings. They had merit and have to stay. 69.145.123.171 Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:37 (UTC)
I am editing pages. People who disagree can't simply claim vandalism--just like the way I made false claims on your talk page--is it fair that you keep it there? and other people think that you are a vandal? I've written most of lethal injection, shock and awe, a good part of american conservatism, the public opinion section on capital punishment(got in a heated debate there and nrcprm2026 was eventually banned from editing), parts of euthanasia, topics on etomidate, valium, pentothal, pentobarbiturate, neuromuscular blockers. Anybody can claim vandalism and throw a claim onto my talk page. They are bogus warnings. The deletion for reaganomics--there is simply an edit war since its all pov there. I probably won't be wasting my time there. Again, all of this stuff is worthless. Don't you have something better to do than police a person's talkpage. I only want it cleaned up and I'm not that good at wiki to figure out how to do an archive... ER MD 20:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Actually, it looks like you deleted it from your talk page! If you are deleting stuff from your page, I'm going to clean up mine. Thanks... ER MD 20:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
As for warnings, from my understanding of how wiki works, the administrators have a tool to see how many times that you have been blocked. As for me, I've been blocked 3 times prior (because I get pissed off dealing with not so intelligent people--go read my history with 4 people who claimed that I was not a doctor even when my IP prointed to the hospitals that I worked at--they claimed that I hacked into hospital IP to "falsely" claim that I was a doctor) to getting now blocked 2 times for trying to clean up my talk page. ER MD 21:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Finally, the talk page states: "Furthermore WP:VAND states: Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. It is generally acceptable to remove misplaced vandalism tags, as long as the reasoning is solid."
I have not vandalized any pages except for nrcprm2026 user page prior to that user getting a permanent ban for his behavior. I have contributed to wiki--see above articles--and I am getting real tired of defending myself against baseless accusations. Is there a way that I can tell people not to write on my user talk page? ER MD 21:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

JESUS CHRIST!!!!!

I have 3 editors constantly playing around with my talk page. Do these people not have anything better to do? I have responded to entries and the false claims of vandalism. Go look at my edits for heavens sake! Read the above section--comments on the talk page can be deleted. ER MD 21:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Breath

I knew you were going to bring that up, so allow me to explain: warning places accidently or without merit may be taken out-warnings put there for a reason are not supposed to be removed, ever. If you continue, you will be blocked again. The warnings you put on my page had not reason to be there. I can contribute without a username and it's obviously not against policy. And the 3RR rule doesn't apply when dealing with vandalism, which your removing of warnings constitues as. So calm down and stop removing warnings. 69.145.123.171 Monday, July 3, 2006, 22:22 (UTC)