| Revision as of 10:46, 6 July 2006 editSpasage (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,436 edits India -> India + Pakistan + Bangladesh← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:49, 6 July 2006 edit undoSpasage (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,436 edits →India -> India + Pakistan + BangladeshNext edit → | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * |
* or disamg page of India. | ||
| * or disamg page of India, which explains name India. | |||
| --] 10:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | --] 10:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:49, 6 July 2006
I usually reply to messages on the talk page of the user who left the message but many time you can also find replies here. I will delete any messages that I find useless. |
Thank you.
There are many few non-Muslim maintining neutral view towards Islamic articles. It is my pleasure to find you. Thank you. --- Faisal 17:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you :). --a.n.o.n.y.m 17:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
No personal attacks
Can you explain to me, why you keep restoring a personal attack me on Irishpunktom's userpage? -- Karl Meier 19:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's his user page, editing it is vandalism. And I don't "keep restoring"; I reverted once. Ask him to remove it or get another opinion, but don't do it yourself. Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m 19:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- I ask you again to please quit harassing me, by restoring personal remarks regarding me on Irishpunktom's userpage. Nobody own any pages here on Misplaced Pages, and personal attacks can be removed on sight. If you keep harassing me, and insist on restoring these personal remarks/attacks on Irishpunktom's userpage, then I'll have to make a complaint on the administrators noticeboard about your and Irishpunktoms behavior, and bring it to the attention of a broader range of Wikipedians. -- Karl Meier 19:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- You think that reverting someone's edits to a user's page is harrassment even if if it's done once?
- About four other editors have also reverted you. I remember you had a very racist link on your userpage once that you absolutely refused to take off even when administators warned you. You can not edit his page, please ask him to remove it. I have nicely responded to your answer. Good bye. --a.n.o.n.y.m 19:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- It is true that there is several members of the "Muslims Guild" that has insisted on readding the personal attacks against me, but until now you are the only administrator that has done it. In my opinion it makes it much more serious, as administrators should be expected to be experienced users, that didn't engaged in such behavior (harassment/personal attacks and remarks). Regarding the external link, I have already agreed to remove it from my userpage a long time. In my opinion it wasn't racist, it was just an angry response to the violent attacks that happend just because of a few cartoons. This being said, I have already admittet that it was wrong that I placed the external link on my userpage, and it surely doesn't give editors such as you and Irishpunktom the right to harass me months after I removed the link. Please end your insults against me. -- Karl Meier 19:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- You aren't allowed to edit another person's page and that's it. Don't do it because if he reports you will be blocked for vandalism. And please stop exagerrating one revert by me as harassment. I might have prevented you from being blocked. --a.n.o.n.y.m 19:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- You don't own any pages on Misplaced Pages, and personal attacks can be removed on sight whereever they are. If you feel that I vandalize Irishpunktoms userpage by removing a personal attack against me, then please file a report on "vandalism in progress" or quit your false accusations against me. It's bad enough that you restore these personal attacks. -- Karl Meier 20:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- I think it should be removed but me reverting one of your edits to someone else's user page is not harassment even if you are biased enough to think so. You should have asked another editor or admin to remove them for you. Not do it yourself when three or four different editors have told you not to do so. --a.n.o.n.y.m 20:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- If you where not "biased" as you call it, and if you really believe it should be removed, then I don't think you would have restored it. The plain and simple facts are that Irishpunktom made a personal attack against me on his userpage, and that you insisted that it should stay there. You even used one of your admin tools (the rollback feature) to insist on having this personal attack against me on Irishpunktoms userpage. -- Karl Meier 20:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
IMPRESSED very MUCH WITH YOUR THOUGHTS AND ANALYSIS
I am very much impressed with your thoughts on Islamic Terrorism and on other points.I have gone through the INTELLIGENT ANALYSIS of the problem with the reference at one place, with syrprise. You have good collected the material as well as reference the sites at one place which earlier I have not seen. I will go through because I want to know more about the Islamic Terrorism and Islamic Extremeist. I am with you and support you. Keep this sprit always.
Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review#User:Raphael1/Wikiethics
Since you previously showed interest in the former proposed policy Wikiethics, I'd like to inform you about this deletion review. Raphael1 15:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Where are you?
Where are you these days. Without you they are becoming stronger and I am missing you. They are going to unprotect Muhammad article. They want to pust their stuff in. Please stop its unprotection and ready for reverting their POVs. I hope to see you soon around. --- Faisal 11:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
undelete
Salam bro. Don't you think we should undelete Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sahaba's ancestors? I put quite much time on it, and are proud of it, i belive its to usefull to be deleted. Im trying to see what people think before taking it to undeleteANI. What to you think?--Striver 08:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Semi-protect South Central Farm
That anon has been making those edits for the last few days. The page was semi-protected for a while which helped, but it was recently lifted. Can you keep an eye on that page and if it happens again, semi-protect again? The Ungovernable Force 06:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Accusations of personal attacks
I see that you have accused me of calling other Wikipedians "names". That is a very serious accusation and I would like you to substanciate it, or withdraw it. Please provide a diff where I call any Wikipedian any disrespectful names, or quit making any such false accusations against me. -- Karl Meier 11:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Category marked for deletion
You may be interested.
BhaiSaab 00:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Irishpunktom
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Irishpunktom. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Irishpunktom/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Irishpunktom/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Johnleemk | Talk 10:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks!
| File:FA-22 Raptor.jpg | Thanks for voting! Hello Anonymous editor, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
--Pilot|guy 22:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Misplaced Pages:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
fyi
Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2006_June_26#Sahaba.27s_ancestors --Striver 20:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Happy Canada Day
Happy Canada Day, though I see you're (hopefully just) on a wikibreak. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 01:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
India -> India + Pakistan + Bangladesh_India_+_Pakistan_+_Bangladesh-2006-07-06T10:46:00.000Z">
I and User:Rama's Arrow were discussing linkage of pages to India when refer to pre-1947 India (undivided India). Please have a look at discussion, and comment. You can also invite user interested in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. Following is statement to start:
India after 1947 consists of three countries, Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. When we use word India, in articles, refereeing to whole India, links are such that they bring us to present day India (Republic of India), reducing size of pre-1947 India considerably. Is it possible that when we refer to pre-1947 India we use a term which encompasses whole India not just present day India? Please comment.
Following are suggestions:
- British India
- Indian Subcontinent
- Undivided India
- or disamg page of India.
--Spasage 10:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)_India_+_Pakistan_+_Bangladesh"> _India_+_Pakistan_+_Bangladesh">