| Revision as of 06:02, 3 September 2014 editKendrick7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,315 edits →You win: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:11, 6 September 2014 edit undoDaveApter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,808 edits →RfC: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| I Just wanted to let you know that I've given up the ghost per ], and per your earlier inclination I've been trying to purge the category myself. That doesn't mean that they aren't coming for me; I only hope that you'll carry on after my absence -- ]<sup>]</sup> 06:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC) | I Just wanted to let you know that I've given up the ghost per ], and per your earlier inclination I've been trying to purge the category myself. That doesn't mean that they aren't coming for me; I only hope that you'll carry on after my absence -- ]<sup>]</sup> 06:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == RfC == | |||
| I have posted a Request for Comment at ] You may be interested since you have discussed this subject in the past. ] (]) 13:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:11, 6 September 2014
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 |
|
todo
- add to citogenesis page: User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Congratulations_for_creating_new_knowledge_in_reliable_sources.21
- another citogenesis:
Precious again
categories
Thank you for quality articles, such as Magnus Manske, and for sorting categories and article names as a Wiki Gnome, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 555th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the award @Gerda Arendt:, I really appreciate it.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 23:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Good job standing up to all the hate that goes your way. Some people personally attack you, and I think that you have really stood up to that. While we might not see eye to eye on issues such as inclusion standards on the VAM/VAW categories, I think we can both appreciate reasonable discussion, which may get heated, but you always stay frosty. Grognard 123chess456 (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks for the cookie Grodnard. I wish I could stay more cool sometimes actually, one can always do better. The Dalai Lama said "Be kind whenever possible. It is always possible." Anyway, recent dramas have caused me to wonder whether participating here is a good use of my time, so I'm going for an extended break, hopefully I'll be more up to editing here someday.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 23:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
ARBCOM clarification request regarding use of "TERF"
I have initiated a request for clarification from the ARBCOM regarding the use of "TERF" per discussions on Talk:Radical feminism. I am messaging you because you have been involved in past discussions regarding this issue and may wish to participate in the new discussion at the ARBCOM. The discussion can be found here. Thank you and best wishes. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
You win
I Just wanted to let you know that I've given up the ghost per Category_talk:Anti-Semitism#RFC_on_purging_individuals_and_groups, and per your earlier inclination I've been trying to purge the category myself. That doesn't mean that they aren't coming for me; I only hope that you'll carry on after my absence -- Kendrick7 06:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
RfC
I have posted a Request for Comment at Talk:Landmark_Worldwide#RFC:_Has_the_neutrality_of_this_article_been_improved_or_degraded_by_recent_wholesale_changes.3F You may be interested since you have discussed this subject in the past. DaveApter (talk) 13:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)