Revision as of 03:11, 7 September 2014 editViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,112 edits →Problematic wording: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:22, 7 September 2014 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,277 edits →Problematic wordingNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Due to the repeated reverts, and the failure of the involved editor to appear on this talk page to discuss the problems I listed above, I will go into them in more detail below. ] (]) 03:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC) | Due to the repeated reverts, and the failure of the involved editor to appear on this talk page to discuss the problems I listed above, I will go into them in more detail below. ] (]) 03:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
*The involved editor (the guy that wrote this, in fact) has a name. I rolled back your little warning, and will plant one on your talk page for your disregard of the sources, you know-it-all. How is your Dutch? ] (]) 03:14, 7 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
*. "highly problematic wording"? His "non-Jewish appearance" (and note that I added a modifier) is verified, and I've added even more inline cites for it. "Bordering on unintentional antisemitic stereotypes" is quite a charge, {{U|Viriditas}}, and I would like to see you explain how my rendering of the sources, which are in Dutch, is somehow incorrect. ] (]) 03:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:22, 7 September 2014
Problematic wording
Just a note to say that I've removed highly problematic wording, bordering on unintentional antisemitic stereotypes and language. Viriditas (talk) 02:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Due to the repeated reverts, and the failure of the involved editor to appear on this talk page to discuss the problems I listed above, I will go into them in more detail below. Viriditas (talk) 03:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- The involved editor (the guy that wrote this, in fact) has a name. I rolled back your little warning, and will plant one on your talk page for your disregard of the sources, you know-it-all. How is your Dutch? Drmies (talk) 03:14, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- This edit is plain wrong. "highly problematic wording"? His "non-Jewish appearance" (and note that I added a modifier) is verified, and I've added even more inline cites for it. "Bordering on unintentional antisemitic stereotypes" is quite a charge, Viriditas, and I would like to see you explain how my rendering of the sources, which are in Dutch, is somehow incorrect. Drmies (talk) 03:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)