Misplaced Pages

Talk:Skyler Page: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:29, 11 September 2014 editJDDJS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,236 edits The fiasco leading to Page being fired← Previous edit Revision as of 15:17, 13 September 2014 edit undoTutelary (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,196 edits The fiasco leading to Page being fired: rNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:


Whether or not to include on the Clarence page is debatable, but there is no reason to not include it here. The discussion at BLP involved 2 editors, so it does not count as a consensus. ] says to '''consider''' not including info unless they're convicted. It does not say to not include it. Even if it turns out to not be true, it is still notable because it is the reason why he was fired. The article says "allegedly". It does not say that it is true. ] (]) 00:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Whether or not to include on the Clarence page is debatable, but there is no reason to not include it here. The discussion at BLP involved 2 editors, so it does not count as a consensus. ] says to '''consider''' not including info unless they're convicted. It does not say to not include it. Even if it turns out to not be true, it is still notable because it is the reason why he was fired. The article says "allegedly". It does not say that it is true. ] (]) 00:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
: Take a look at ] for me. Allegedly is covered under BLPcrime as well. {{tq|For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or '''is accused of committing,''' a crime unless a conviction is secured.}} Really, the only important thing is that he's fired. We can't cast aspersions of accuse somebody of 'allegedly' doing a crime due to BLP. Imagine if we did that. "X allegedly robbed a bank" or 'Y allegedly raped a girl'. It's just messy and we should err on the side of caution. ] (]) 15:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:17, 13 September 2014

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCartoon Network Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The fiasco leading to Page being fired

I think it's noteworthy enough to mention on the page. 24.110.21.168 (talk) 03:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Agree: Yeah, I think that it was mentioned but removed. That fact should surely be included in the article. - Phill24th (talk). 21:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I'll repeat the comment in the edit box:

Any mention of the allegations raised against Page cannot be included until a successful conviction against him has been secured and reported by reliable sources, per policy.

Please see the following link: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive203#Skylor_Page_at_Clarence_.282014_TV_series.29.E2.80.8E

See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Persons_accused_of_crime

Thank you.

23W 22:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Further discussion has also been raised here; might want to read it too: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Clarence_%282014_TV_series%29#Skyler_Page_Sexual_Harassment
23W 22:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Whether or not to include on the Clarence page is debatable, but there is no reason to not include it here. The discussion at BLP involved 2 editors, so it does not count as a consensus. WP:BLP says to consider not including info unless they're convicted. It does not say to not include it. Even if it turns out to not be true, it is still notable because it is the reason why he was fired. The article says "allegedly". It does not say that it is true. JDDJS (talk) 00:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Take a look at WP:BLPCRIME for me. Allegedly is covered under BLPcrime as well. For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured. Really, the only important thing is that he's fired. We can't cast aspersions of accuse somebody of 'allegedly' doing a crime due to BLP. Imagine if we did that. "X allegedly robbed a bank" or 'Y allegedly raped a girl'. It's just messy and we should err on the side of caution. Tutelary (talk) 15:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Categories: