Revision as of 00:29, 11 September 2014 editJDDJS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,236 edits →The fiasco leading to Page being fired← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:17, 13 September 2014 edit undoTutelary (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,196 edits →The fiasco leading to Page being fired: rNext edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Whether or not to include on the Clarence page is debatable, but there is no reason to not include it here. The discussion at BLP involved 2 editors, so it does not count as a consensus. ] says to '''consider''' not including info unless they're convicted. It does not say to not include it. Even if it turns out to not be true, it is still notable because it is the reason why he was fired. The article says "allegedly". It does not say that it is true. ] (]) 00:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | Whether or not to include on the Clarence page is debatable, but there is no reason to not include it here. The discussion at BLP involved 2 editors, so it does not count as a consensus. ] says to '''consider''' not including info unless they're convicted. It does not say to not include it. Even if it turns out to not be true, it is still notable because it is the reason why he was fired. The article says "allegedly". It does not say that it is true. ] (]) 00:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
: Take a look at ] for me. Allegedly is covered under BLPcrime as well. {{tq|For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or '''is accused of committing,''' a crime unless a conviction is secured.}} Really, the only important thing is that he's fired. We can't cast aspersions of accuse somebody of 'allegedly' doing a crime due to BLP. Imagine if we did that. "X allegedly robbed a bank" or 'Y allegedly raped a girl'. It's just messy and we should err on the side of caution. ] (]) 15:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:17, 13 September 2014
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The fiasco leading to Page being fired
I think it's noteworthy enough to mention on the page. 24.110.21.168 (talk) 03:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Agree: Yeah, I think that it was mentioned but removed. That fact should surely be included in the article. - Phill24th (talk). 21:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'll repeat the comment in the edit box:
Any mention of the allegations raised against Page cannot be included until a successful conviction against him has been secured and reported by reliable sources, per policy.
Please see the following link: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive203#Skylor_Page_at_Clarence_.282014_TV_series.29.E2.80.8E
See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Persons_accused_of_crime
Thank you.
- 23W 22:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Further discussion has also been raised here; might want to read it too: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Clarence_%282014_TV_series%29#Skyler_Page_Sexual_Harassment
- 23W 22:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Whether or not to include on the Clarence page is debatable, but there is no reason to not include it here. The discussion at BLP involved 2 editors, so it does not count as a consensus. WP:BLP says to consider not including info unless they're convicted. It does not say to not include it. Even if it turns out to not be true, it is still notable because it is the reason why he was fired. The article says "allegedly". It does not say that it is true. JDDJS (talk) 00:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Take a look at WP:BLPCRIME for me. Allegedly is covered under BLPcrime as well.
For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured.
Really, the only important thing is that he's fired. We can't cast aspersions of accuse somebody of 'allegedly' doing a crime due to BLP. Imagine if we did that. "X allegedly robbed a bank" or 'Y allegedly raped a girl'. It's just messy and we should err on the side of caution. Tutelary (talk) 15:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Cartoon Network articles
- Low-importance Cartoon Network articles
- WikiProject Cartoon Network articles