Talk:The Beatles (terrorist cell): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 07:17, 16 September 2014 editIanmacm (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,148 edits →Another fine mess...: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:45, 16 September 2014 edit undoBetty Logan (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers78,452 edits →Another fine mess...Next edit →
Line 44:		Line 44:

	This article is becoming a mess, because without a consensus on which version of the article to use from the edit history, all sorts of things are going to get fouled up. For example, contains a heap of bare references. Let's have some consistency here.--'''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 07:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)		This article is becoming a mess, because without a consensus on which version of the article to use from the edit history, all sorts of things are going to get fouled up. For example, contains a heap of bare references. Let's have some consistency here.--'''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 07:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
			:That version is the version that existed before an IP editor from ] without a consensus. As instructed by ], ''"If your merger is reverted, it's controversial and you need to discuss it."'' The content should not be reinserted again unless there is a clear consensus for it. Both articles have been tagged with for a merge proposal so I suggest pursuing the course of action as laid out by the merger guidelines i.e. propose the merge, discuss it, determine what the consensus it, then undertake the necessary steps to merge if that is the outcome. Until the outcome is known it is probably best to continue developing the original version of the article. ] (]) 07:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:45, 16 September 2014

Template:Syrian Civil War sanctions

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Beatles (terrorist cell) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Article needs cleanup

This article is pretty messy at the moment. The merge was rather unprecedented. Any thoughts? JhonsJoe (talk) 01:40, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Do you have a source for the computer-generated image? Rothorpe (talk) 02:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

It appears to be ABC News. But it is public domain nevertheless. JhonsJoe (talk) 02:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Images of Steven Sotloff

Images of Steven Sotloff has been nominated for deletion for the last 9 days. You can join in the deletion discussion here.~Technophant (talk) 02:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Questions on Notability

I understand that the two WP:RS upon which notability has been based to justify the creation of this article as The Beatles (terrorist cell) are and .

I also understand that the two sources simply say:

"The three UK-born militants were referred to as "the Beatles" by fellow hostages because of their nationality, the former captive added."

"Hostages of three ISIS British-accented militants came to call the trio 'The Beatles'"

So, is my understanding correct that there is no evidence that the group has ever called themselves "The Beatles"? Also, is my understanding correct that only a (very) small number of hostages "decided" to call them The Beatles, just because of their nationality and/or because they had British accents?

Also, I have seen ample of evidence that Jihadi John is notable and agree with the creation of his article. But, how are Jihadi George and Jihadi Ringo notable? Worldedixor (talk) 06:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Questions on using the adjective terrorist in the article

We've had extensive discussions on whether it is appropriate to use the adjective terrorist.

We need to protect the Misplaced Pages:Five pillars on which this project was founded. We strive to maintain a WP:NPOV. Terrorist isn't neutral terminology.

So, assuming The Beatles are notable, and I have not seen evidence yet, who designated this group as "terrorist". If there is a WP:RS can prove that a certain body has designated the group as terrorist, shouldn't we say "so and so designated the group as a terrorist"? Worldedixor (talk) 06:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Another fine mess...

This article is becoming a mess, because without a consensus on which version of the article to use from the edit history, all sorts of things are going to get fouled up. For example, this version contains a heap of bare references. Let's have some consistency here.--♦IanMacM♦ 07:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

That version is the version that existed before an IP editor merged content from Jihadi John without a consensus. As instructed by Misplaced Pages:Merging, "If your merger is reverted, it's controversial and you need to discuss it." The content should not be reinserted again unless there is a clear consensus for it. Both articles have been tagged with for a merge proposal so I suggest pursuing the course of action as laid out by the merger guidelines i.e. propose the merge, discuss it, determine what the consensus it, then undertake the necessary steps to merge if that is the outcome. Until the outcome is known it is probably best to continue developing the original version of the article. Betty Logan (talk) 07:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Categories: