Misplaced Pages

User talk:Campb292: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:49, 6 October 2014 editJohnInDC (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,304 edits Michigan - OSU rivalry: new section  Revision as of 03:25, 6 October 2014 edit undoJohnInDC (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,304 edits October 2014: new sectionNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


Please read the Talk page. The NCAA and OSU both agree that a vacated contest means, no win for the penalized school. This is all clearly laid out. Keep making your edit and sooner or later you'll be blocked from all editing. Thanks. ] (]) 02:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Please read the Talk page. The NCAA and OSU both agree that a vacated contest means, no win for the penalized school. This is all clearly laid out. Keep making your edit and sooner or later you'll be blocked from all editing. Thanks. ] (]) 02:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

== October 2014 ==

{{uw-3rr|Michigan-Ohio State football rivalry}} ] (]) 03:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:25, 6 October 2014

Michigan - OSU rivalry

Please read the Talk page. The NCAA and OSU both agree that a vacated contest means, no win for the penalized school. This is all clearly laid out. Keep making your edit and sooner or later you'll be blocked from all editing. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 02:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Michigan-Ohio State football rivalry shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JohnInDC (talk) 03:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)