Revision as of 07:30, 15 October 2014 edit115.134.136.235 (talk) →Hinduism and Judaism← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:25, 16 October 2014 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,389 edits →Do you ever wonder...Next edit → | ||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
::Okay, just letting you know; a clarify tag can hang around for a bit, but if you are reverting unsourced content in, sourcing it becomes a bit more urgent. Cheers, ] (]) 05:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC) | ::Okay, just letting you know; a clarify tag can hang around for a bit, but if you are reverting unsourced content in, sourcing it becomes a bit more urgent. Cheers, ] (]) 05:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::Some pages - have a clue, but 'most Hindus' was not relevant, it is a basic belief. ] (]) 05:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC) | :::Some pages - have a clue, but 'most Hindus' was not relevant, it is a basic belief. ] (]) 05:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Do you ever wonder... == | |||
Why a group of editors who I don't even interact with in articlespace anymore are so fired up to have me blocked or banned? It's really something to watch. ] (]) 03:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:I hear that, also seeking ] is just inflammatory. ] (]) 03:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
::After getting TBANned, Fearofreprisal has continued to evade his TBAN ("I made a page in my userspace, but it's all a legit part of my ArbCom request!") and continued making personal attacks against other editors (I'm sorry, but assuming that everyone who trusts the professional historians on the historicity of Jesus is a "Christian apologist" is '''ridiculously offensive'''). When I called for him to be blocked for this kind of behaviour he went back to making these and similar attacks against me. Once he stops trolling the historicity of Jesus article with his fringe theories, and stops making personal attacks against other editors, I will stop asking for him to be blocked and for him to ('''voluntarily''') declare his main account's identity. Alternative accounts have legit uses (I know this better than most), but claiming that you are trying to protect your real world identity from association with ridiculous fringe theories by using a single-purpose account solely for the purpose of promoting those theories is ''not'' one of these legit uses. I can '''fully understand''' the need to protect your real identity from legitimately controversial issues, but ] and are '''not''' likely to hire thugs to come and "silence" anyone when it comes to the historicity of Jesus. ] (<small>]]</small>) 13:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:25, 16 October 2014
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
.
Dakshina???
It is called Dakshin meaning South in Hindi. While the word Dakshina means Donation or Tip in Hindi, leads to disambiguation and double meaning. The reason I didn't leave edit summary because it's optional, plus i saw it a minor change. (Spelling correction) One more thing, next time you ever leave a message to someone, be nice and assume good faith. The lanaguage you have used seemed like a threat. Thanks! Hemant Dabral 19:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Are you trying to game the system? Original title was Dakshina Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha and you made it Dakshin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha. Dakshina means gifted education, while Dakshin means south. You had not only changed the official name of this organisation but also the whole meaning.
- Your edits are causing disruption for a long time. You have recently moved a long old page title to something new that was uncommon compared to the previous title. Issuing you a final warning about the page moves. Bladesmulti (talk) 00:48, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Don't try to teach me what does Dakshin means. I know Hindi better than you could ever know dude. And your tone is quite offensive. I Warn you!!! This is your last warning!!! You are gone!!! Haha dude don't talk like a child. Talk like a mature man and discuss the issue. You are not the only man in this world who has a piece of knowledge. There are many others too. Learn to respect them. Dakshina doesn't mean education it means Tip/Offering. Correct yourself there 1st. Discuss it before you judge anyone. You think you're brainy one and all others you assume lesser ones. Hemant Dabral 00:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hemant Dabral This isn't really intended to teach you meanings of terms. It's intended to be the start of a environment to the notation and ideas convenient for working to make qualitative collaborations you are certainly excited about.
- Daksh means capable. If that organization has named itself "dakshina" with the purpose of education, what it would mean? Now let us don't argue about the meaning of a word, which is not even relevant. You can just stop making page moves or change words when you are not sure about your information.
A barnstar for you
The Hinduism Award | ||
You deserve this barnstar brother. Carry on. I am proud of you. Tito☸Dutta 03:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks Titodduta Bladesmulti (talk) 05:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
What user preference?
Your edit comment made no sense to me. . Please note these sanctions: and Tarc may not edit any administrative noticeboards. Considering his comment was only inflammatory, why would you restore it now that he is banned from that page? He cannot restore it himself and part of that whole Arbcom case was restoring inflammatory comments of editors prohibited from doing so themselves. Such proxy reverts for banned editors were found to be disruptive. Note, he did post stuff that was slightly more productive that wasn't removed, only the completely unproductive comment was removed as it will only be used as troll bait and since he is pagebanned it falls under WP:REVERTBAN. I ask that you undo your revert and respect the page ban that was enabled by ArbCom. --DHeyward (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- DHeyward They will be kept not only for Tarc's preference. He had made that comment 16 hours before he was topic banned from all administrator boards.
- That section was tagged for archive, it shouldn't be edited as per the closing administrator. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:28, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- There is no time limit on WP:REVERTBAN and the closing admin can restore those comments if he feels it necessary to justify his close. I don't think he did. --DHeyward (talk) 19:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
The 100 Best Books of All Time
Hello, would you please take a look at Talk:The 100 Best Books of All Time and consider my arguments; this is a published series of books. Then why not include a list of the books in the series? Bw --Orland (talk) 07:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- It is a matter of representing already published material. I will ask a admin who is busy with copyright cleanup. We can wait. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Your edits are FINE
YOU NEED NOT MENTORING!! NOT URGENTLY!!!
JUST JOKING ... Hafspajen (talk) 13:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hafspajen During those days, whatever mess there was, in a short time it had been cleared well! Just 74. and maybe CorinneSD went missing. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well, looks like Corinne doesn't know there are computers in public places too. Hafspajen (talk) 13:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- So, we end the mentorship? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well, looks like Corinne doesn't know there are computers in public places too. Hafspajen (talk) 13:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hinduism and Judaism
Blades, your reverts are fine because the IP is making changes to some sourced content, but the unsourced passage that you are reverting back in really needs sources. Also, the sentence about Narayana should probably be toned down a bit further; it is a bit sweeping at this point (alternatively, you could provide a quote.) Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Vanamonde93 I had seen every edit of yours, it will take some time to clarify the tagged ones. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, just letting you know; a clarify tag can hang around for a bit, but if you are reverting unsourced content in, sourcing it becomes a bit more urgent. Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Some pages - have a clue, but 'most Hindus' was not relevant, it is a basic belief. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, just letting you know; a clarify tag can hang around for a bit, but if you are reverting unsourced content in, sourcing it becomes a bit more urgent. Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Do you ever wonder...
Why a group of editors who I don't even interact with in articlespace anymore are so fired up to have me blocked or banned? It's really something to watch. Fearofreprisal (talk) 03:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- I hear that, also seeking CU for fishing is just inflammatory. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- After getting TBANned, Fearofreprisal has continued to evade his TBAN ("I made a page in my userspace, but it's all a legit part of my ArbCom request!") and continued making personal attacks against other editors (I'm sorry, but assuming that everyone who trusts the professional historians on the historicity of Jesus is a "Christian apologist" is ridiculously offensive). When I called for him to be blocked for this kind of behaviour he went back to making these and similar attacks against me. Once he stops trolling the historicity of Jesus article with his fringe theories, and stops making personal attacks against other editors, I will stop asking for him to be blocked and for him to (voluntarily) declare his main account's identity. Alternative accounts have legit uses (I know this better than most), but claiming that you are trying to protect your real world identity from association with ridiculous fringe theories by using a single-purpose account solely for the purpose of promoting those theories is not one of these legit uses. I can fully understand the need to protect your real identity from legitimately controversial issues, but Bart Ehrman and Dale Martin are not likely to hire thugs to come and "silence" anyone when it comes to the historicity of Jesus. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 13:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)