| Revision as of 03:15, 20 October 2014 view sourceArmyLine (talk | contribs)247 edits →The abuse continues: Dreadstar is pretty busy← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:30, 20 October 2014 view source Tarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits →The abuse continuesNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ::Thank you.--] (]) 21:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC) | ::Thank you.--] (]) 21:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::Er, bullshit. All he said was that Milo is becoming too close to the gamergate stuff and is losing his objectivity on the matter. That is ''mild'' bordering on the |
:::Er, bullshit. All he said was that Milo is becoming too close to the gamergate stuff and is losing his objectivity on the matter. That is ''mild'' bordering on the milquetoast. Disagree if you like, but ] policy protects subjects from actual defamatory attacks and slurs and the like, it does not inoculate the subject from every last critical observation. ] (]) 21:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::: Note: this is referring to Milo. I would think that saying "yowsa! can you believe he is blaming the victims of the death threats" (not an actual quotation) is patently defamatory and has no place on an encyclopedia. I'm mainly posting this for Dreadstar's convenience and have no interest in starting an argument here. I suggest you contact an admin in a new thread if you are concerned about my statements or discuss it on my talk page. I am willing to listen to what you have to say and will not screen out fair concerns.--] (]) 03:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC) | :::: Note: this is referring to Milo. I would think that saying "yowsa! can you believe he is blaming the victims of the death threats" (not an actual quotation) is patently defamatory and has no place on an encyclopedia. I'm mainly posting this for Dreadstar's convenience and have no interest in starting an argument here. I suggest you contact an admin in a new thread if you are concerned about my statements or discuss it on my talk page. I am willing to listen to what you have to say and will not screen out fair concerns.--] (]) 03:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I really don't have a general interest in what you have to say, to be honest. I only posted here to point out that this specific claim of "defamation" was bogus. ] is thataway if you really wish to make hay of it. ] (]) 12:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:30, 20 October 2014
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
|
||||
Archives and sandboxes Defender
Award!
RL Barnstar
Holy wow. Good job, Dreadstar. --Fang Aili | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
New comments below this section
The abuse continues
Shortly before you visited the Talk:Gamergate_controversy article and after my previous request TheRedPenOfDoom made open attacks against living person Milo Yiannopoulos. As I was chastised for voicing my suspicions against WP:F, I feel this too will warrant a formal notice.--ArmyLine (talk) 05:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Due to RL, I've had no time to look at WP, hopefully I'll have some time this coming week. Dreadstar ☥ 01:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you.--ArmyLine (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Er, bullshit. All he said was that Milo is becoming too close to the gamergate stuff and is losing his objectivity on the matter. That is mild bordering on the milquetoast. Disagree if you like, but WP:BLP policy protects subjects from actual defamatory attacks and slurs and the like, it does not inoculate the subject from every last critical observation. Tarc (talk) 21:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- The mainstream response to B/Y is pretty much "yawn, nothing there", "hmmm, some presentation out of context -not exactly what you would expect from a journalist purportedly expounding on journalistic ethics" to "yowsa! can you believe he is blaming the victims of the death threats????? " I am not really sure how you wan to fit that into the article. Note: this is referring to Milo. I would think that saying "yowsa! can you believe he is blaming the victims of the death threats" (not an actual quotation) is patently defamatory and has no place on an encyclopedia. I'm mainly posting this for Dreadstar's convenience and have no interest in starting an argument here. I suggest you contact an admin in a new thread if you are concerned about my statements or discuss it on my talk page. I am willing to listen to what you have to say and will not screen out fair concerns.--ArmyLine (talk) 03:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I really don't have a general interest in what you have to say, to be honest. I only posted here to point out that this specific claim of "defamation" was bogus. WP:ANI is thataway if you really wish to make hay of it. Tarc (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- The mainstream response to B/Y is pretty much "yawn, nothing there", "hmmm, some presentation out of context -not exactly what you would expect from a journalist purportedly expounding on journalistic ethics" to "yowsa! can you believe he is blaming the victims of the death threats????? " I am not really sure how you wan to fit that into the article. Note: this is referring to Milo. I would think that saying "yowsa! can you believe he is blaming the victims of the death threats" (not an actual quotation) is patently defamatory and has no place on an encyclopedia. I'm mainly posting this for Dreadstar's convenience and have no interest in starting an argument here. I suggest you contact an admin in a new thread if you are concerned about my statements or discuss it on my talk page. I am willing to listen to what you have to say and will not screen out fair concerns.--ArmyLine (talk) 03:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Er, bullshit. All he said was that Milo is becoming too close to the gamergate stuff and is losing his objectivity on the matter. That is mild bordering on the milquetoast. Disagree if you like, but WP:BLP policy protects subjects from actual defamatory attacks and slurs and the like, it does not inoculate the subject from every last critical observation. Tarc (talk) 21:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)