| Revision as of 23:09, 21 October 2014 editKarlhard (talk | contribs)980 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:10, 21 October 2014 edit undoKarlhard (talk | contribs)980 edits relistNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ::::I know it looks suspicious, but after doing some research, it's actually held, nominates attend to a venue and they celebrate and give physical awards the winner - that doesn't stabilize their notability either, but it's covered by news, paparazzis, recorded and transmitted via local TV. I made a Google Search query and found photos, you can see them and . And also found an introduction to the same subject . Tell me if I am wrong. <b>]</b> <small>]</small> 00:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC) | ::::I know it looks suspicious, but after doing some research, it's actually held, nominates attend to a venue and they celebrate and give physical awards the winner - that doesn't stabilize their notability either, but it's covered by news, paparazzis, recorded and transmitted via local TV. I made a Google Search query and found photos, you can see them and . And also found an introduction to the same subject . Tell me if I am wrong. <b>]</b> <small>]</small> 00:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)</small> | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | |||
| :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | |||
| :'''Relisting comment:''' We need more contributors to collaborate<br /> | |||
| :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 23:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] | |||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | |||
Revision as of 23:10, 21 October 2014
Cash L3wis
- Cash L3wis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any reliable source material for this at all. Searches for "cash lewis", "cash lewis" rapper, etc., turn up nothing other than blogs and some self-published material. (Note that Google will automatically recognize "L3wis" as synonymous with "Lewis".) I therefore see no indication of notability. Seraphimblade 14:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- I am a little bit confused with the article too. But after research, a lover of hip-hop music (see my user page) and a Misplaced Pages contributor, I found this appropriate to a Misplaced Pages Article. I did some research and found that it has 10,000+ hits just of his name. I think it's good (not notable) but passable, when the article has charted one song (but did not received recognition nor coverage) and gaining mainstream recognition with over 350,000 views (I am not saying this marks his notability) just passable. Karlhard 03:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Certainly it's a common mistake. Indeed, thinking number of Google hits matters toward that is so common that it got written about. It doesn't, though, and there's no space between being notable and being passable as an article subject. (iTunes is not a national chart, by the way, as Apple is not a nation.) What's ultimately required for notability is that the subject have been reasonably extensively noted, by reliable sources not having an interest in doing so. That means more than a name drop or passing mention like the one listed below, it means coverage in some depth. Since article material must be verifiable via reliable sources, if that's not the case, we just don't have enough to write an article from. If he's covered more extensively in the future, the article can always be started at that time, but we always follow that source material coming about, not try to predict its future availability. Seraphimblade 05:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe the Google Search do not clarify his notability. In the process I found an article about Wiz Khalifa and Amber Rose that mentions Cash L3wis, I'm gonna still providing references as the conversation goes on - I know this doesn't prove the notability but somehow collaborate with the process. The iTunes (US) chart, is actually a chart, not because iTunes is not a country or Apple a nation but to US (United States) actually is. Karlhard 18:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- This might be case of WP:B2B, not lack of notability - yet. Karlhard 00:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe the Google Search do not clarify his notability. In the process I found an article about Wiz Khalifa and Amber Rose that mentions Cash L3wis, I'm gonna still providing references as the conversation goes on - I know this doesn't prove the notability but somehow collaborate with the process. The iTunes (US) chart, is actually a chart, not because iTunes is not a country or Apple a nation but to US (United States) actually is. Karlhard 18:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Certainly it's a common mistake. Indeed, thinking number of Google hits matters toward that is so common that it got written about. It doesn't, though, and there's no space between being notable and being passable as an article subject. (iTunes is not a national chart, by the way, as Apple is not a nation.) What's ultimately required for notability is that the subject have been reasonably extensively noted, by reliable sources not having an interest in doing so. That means more than a name drop or passing mention like the one listed below, it means coverage in some depth. Since article material must be verifiable via reliable sources, if that's not the case, we just don't have enough to write an article from. If he's covered more extensively in the future, the article can always be started at that time, but we always follow that source material coming about, not try to predict its future availability. Seraphimblade 05:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- I am a little bit confused with the article too. But after research, a lover of hip-hop music (see my user page) and a Misplaced Pages contributor, I found this appropriate to a Misplaced Pages Article. I did some research and found that it has 10,000+ hits just of his name. I think it's good (not notable) but passable, when the article has charted one song (but did not received recognition nor coverage) and gaining mainstream recognition with over 350,000 views (I am not saying this marks his notability) just passable. Karlhard 03:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - I understand the situation, but it someway meets WP:MUSICBIO (2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart), it charted on the iTunes' Charts but not received coverage yet. Just please flag this as refimprove and give me 2 months to complete it. Karlhard 15:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- I was looking in Google and found: this and I don't know if this is good enough. Will be updating this over time. Thanks Karlhard 16:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The EOTM awards do not appear to be notable awards. I can't determine what they even are. Their site doesn't even say what "EOTM" stands for! It might be "Entrepreneurs On The Move", but then again that may be another group entirely (a different blog with another logo). Looks suspiciously like a PR site though. — Gwalla | Talk 18:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I know it looks suspicious, but after doing some research, it's actually held, nominates attend to a venue and they celebrate and give physical awards the winner - that doesn't stabilize their notability either, but it's covered by news, paparazzis, recorded and transmitted via local TV. I made a Google Search query and found photos, you can see them here and here. And also found an introduction to the same subject here. Tell me if I am wrong. Karlhard 00:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The EOTM awards do not appear to be notable awards. I can't determine what they even are. Their site doesn't even say what "EOTM" stands for! It might be "Entrepreneurs On The Move", but then again that may be another group entirely (a different blog with another logo). Looks suspiciously like a PR site though. — Gwalla | Talk 18:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Karlhard (talk) 23:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Relisting comment: We need more contributors to collaborate
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Karlhard (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories: