Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 80:
Line 80:
:::Who are you referring to? If you mean Kosh then I really don't have an opinion on the matter. If you mean Ihardlythinkso then I suggest that you do not refer to this editor at all and let others be concerned with their behavior. ] 15:15, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
:::Who are you referring to? If you mean Kosh then I really don't have an opinion on the matter. If you mean Ihardlythinkso then I suggest that you do not refer to this editor at all and let others be concerned with their behavior. ] 15:15, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
:::IHTS seems to be under the mistaken impression that my prior message was intended as rhetorical. He is under the impression that it is a violation of the interaction ban so I would like a response that clarifies the matter. ] 19:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to my talk page! Click the + button at the top of the page to create a new discussion or use any of the "edit" buttons to contribute to an already existing discussion.
Postings made in the form of haiku will be given first priority.
Shellshocker
Thanks for adding some wikipedia clout on that edit, as a VERY new wikipedia user my professional opinions seem useless here lol, thanks again ;0) Edprevost (talk) 16:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Clout aside any user can remove unverified information if they think it is dubious. The burden of verifiability is on the person seeking to include it.
Even if it was possible to attack a log parser with this bug we would need some sort of source to demonstrate that. Let me know if you want any help with Misplaced Pages. Chillum16:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
AN title
Personally, I find it hard to follow conversations in page history when the title changes midconversation, so I reverted you AN title change. If you really feel strongly about it I won't object to you changing it, but I don't think have a totally neutral title is that important. Obviously, it's totally biased and offensive it would need to change. NE Ent23:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
The talk page guideline page does allow for editing of others talk page headings but only if there is no objection. It is no big deal. Chillum01:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
A little more about a just-closed ANI discussion
You closed that "Editor adding refspam" discussion at ANI just before I could add this: That "blog" that's being spammed is copying old news items (e.g. this ref that Graemkahn wanted added to London is a copy of a 2010 BBC news story) and the blog is hidden behind a fake website that's a rip-off of www.riverfilm.com. Add in this bizarre claim that the refs were added by accident while looking for citations and i think we've found another site to add to the blacklist.
Chillum, would you be able to add it to the blacklist? NebY (talk) 16:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
I have warned this spammer about our blacklist. Normally the mere mention of the fact that it is a popular public blacklist that search engines and forums use is enough to strike terror into the heart of the most fierce spammer.
If this pattern continues I will add it to the blacklist, but a single incident is not enough in my opinion. Most spammers learn to leave Misplaced Pages alone when faced with the blacklist, if not I will make good on my warning.
Thank you for drawing my attention to this. I saw content from Misplaced Pages, but it now appears the spammer grabs their content from various sources. It is not particularly creative, thousands of people have made blogs with BS content and spammed it all over. Chillum16:36, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
OK, thanks. Yes, I've seen plenty of websites with scraped content before but this one's very good-looking but utterly stolen front page, plus the spammer's behaviour, did bother me a bit more. NebY (talk) 16:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
I've requested multiple times that to keep off my Talk page unless you have official business. Ignoring those requests is tantamount to baiting and harassment. What does it take to get through to you?!: Stay the fuck off my Talk page! Ihardlythinkso (talk) 20:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Umm you were talking to me in a place that was not really appropriate for us to have a discussion. You can call it harassment but nobody else is going to see it that way.
I've requested multiple times that you keep off my Talk page unless you have official business. What does it take to get through to you?!: Stay the fuck off my Talk page! Ihardlythinkso (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Again, if you don't want to interact with me then stop going to pages I was just on and talking to me there. If you want to make snarky comments then you can expect a response. I suspect if you took your harassment theory anywhere you would get hit by a boomerang. Now if you have something to say that is new and not just you repeating yourself go ahead and post, otherwise enjoy the rest of Misplaced Pages. Chillum06:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
User:SoulBrotherNumberOne block
Hi, I just want to point to the indefinite block of this user. For what I saw, his reaction (wich I dont justify) was because other user blanked his personal page, something unfortunately very common in WP (is there any way to avoid other users editing your personal page? If so please tell me, I think other users apart from administrators should have the right to maintain their personal pages as they want.), wich logically angers people. I've been blocked once for my reaction when a vandal deleted contents on my personal page. I know that the actions of vandals dont justify a rude language reaction, but I find it very unjust to punish the user who has been vandalized for his reaction, while the vandal left without punishment. By the way, it seems to me by the context that the way he used the word "Nigga" was more in a colloquial manner than in a pejorative one. Thanks for hearing my thoughts. Regards,--HCPUNXKID 16:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
First off that block is from about 5 years ago. Secondly calling a stranger a nigga is highly inappropriate and even if it was meant in a colloquial manner it is unlikely to be read that way. If this person wants to make an unblock request I would gladly consider it. Please keep in mind there were other edits which were contributing factors such at this one: . This leaves me with the impression that it was meant in the perjorative.
Who are you referring to? If you mean Kosh then I really don't have an opinion on the matter. If you mean Ihardlythinkso then I suggest that you do not refer to this editor at all and let others be concerned with their behavior. Chillum15:15, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
IHTS seems to be under the mistaken impression that my prior message was intended as rhetorical. He is under the impression that it is a violation of the interaction ban so I would like a response that clarifies the matter. Chillum19:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
_by_Ron.jpg){kind=small}
