| Revision as of 00:42, 25 October 2014 editAndyTheGrump (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers54,013 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:47, 25 October 2014 edit undoAndyTheGrump (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers54,013 edits →Warning for edit warring: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :::::I don't give a toss regarding your opinion - if you persist in violating Misplaced Pages policies, I shall have no option but to ask that you be blocked from editing. And no, I'm not the slightest bit interested in watching any video promoting toxic quackery. ] (]) 00:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | :::::I don't give a toss regarding your opinion - if you persist in violating Misplaced Pages policies, I shall have no option but to ask that you be blocked from editing. And no, I'm not the slightest bit interested in watching any video promoting toxic quackery. ] (]) 00:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Warning for edit warring == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 00:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:47, 25 October 2014
Miracle Mineral Supplement
Please read Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine), and discuss any further changes to the article on the talk page. We de not cite 'Natural News' and similar conspiracy-theory websites in articles. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure if we are talking about the same website here. NaturalNews.com is not a conspiracy-theory website WP:ATTACK, it a perfectly legit news reporting agency WP:COMPREHENSIVE, and the article is linking to a video that speaks for itself. Thanks. WP:NPOV purpl9 (talk) 25 October 2014
- A website that claims that the Red Cross is engaged in a coverup concerning MMS is self-evidently a conspiracy-theory website, as anyone can plainly see. And per Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, the only legitimate sources regarding claims for medical efficacy are those described in WP:MEDRS. If you wish to edit the MMS article, you will need to do so according to Misplaced Pages policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:35, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- You can see that. I do not share your opinion in the slightest. The video linked to the Natural News article is depicting Klaas Proesmans acting as narrator of a video where Sodium chlorite is peddled as a cure for Malaria. Have you not seen the video? Klaas Proesmans is the CEO of the Water Reference Center, heavily affiliated with the IFRC. You can see it's Proesmans by going to their website, and you can also see that the Water Reference Center was founded by two national Red Cross societies. Get your facts straight. WP:ATTACK purpl9 (talk) 25 October 2014
- I don't give a toss regarding your opinion - if you persist in violating Misplaced Pages policies, I shall have no option but to ask that you be blocked from editing. And no, I'm not the slightest bit interested in watching any video promoting toxic quackery. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Warning for edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miracle Mineral Supplement. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)