| Revision as of 18:08, 22 October 2014 editAlbinoFerret (talk | contribs)11,178 edits →Re: RfC← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:24, 25 October 2014 edit undoDoc James (talk | contribs)Administrators312,257 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Electronic cigarette. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| You should state your position on the tag in the "position" section as well :) --] 16:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC) | You should state your position on the tag in the "position" section as well :) --] 16:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :I know, but I am working as an election judge in early voting so I cant do as much as normal, I normally work out of my house so I am at the computer all day. I will be putting my position in later today. ] (]) 18:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC) | :I know, but I am working as an election judge in early voting so I cant do as much as normal, I normally work out of my house so I am at the computer all day. I will be putting my position in later today. ] (]) 18:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == October 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (] · ] · ]) <small>(if I write on your page reply on mine)</small> 16:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:24, 25 October 2014
| Welcome to my talk page. Please start all conversations at the bottom of the page. Older discussions will be archived. |
|
Re: RfC
You should state your position on the tag in the "position" section as well :) --Kim D. Petersen 16:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- I know, but I am working as an election judge in early voting so I cant do as much as normal, I normally work out of my house so I am at the computer all day. I will be putting my position in later today. AlbinoFerret (talk) 18:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
Your recent editing history at Electronic cigarette shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC)