| Revision as of 01:56, 25 October 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Dusti/Archive 10) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:01, 26 October 2014 edit undoTrackinfo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers126,469 edits →Your closure: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| </div></div> | </div></div> | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=630676627 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=630676627 --> | ||
| == Your closure == | |||
| After your decision at ], where you wrote the phrase '''Keep''' then stated there is "no consensus to delete," the nominator went back in to change the published verdict as '''no consensus''' and reverted it again when I corrected this. As a lengthy background, this nominator and I have been battling over what I consider his habit of improper nominations without doing any ] research, particularly around the subject of beauty pageants, but I've subsequently discovered this is a wholesale habit of his editing. So he's anticipating that I will take him to ANI about his editing practices, which I will probably have to do and is playing a petty little game to soften the accumulation of negative points against his series of nominations. Yes, we are down to counting how many '''Keeps''' he has against him vs how many '''no consensus''' decisions. That is why this is significant. So this what your wrote as your decision, he has changed it. I guess you can deal with this from here. ] (]) 20:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:01, 26 October 2014
 Archives |
| Index Archive 1 Archive 4 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
| This is Dusti's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
The Signpost: 22 October 2014
- Featured content: Admiral on deck: a modern Ada Lovelace
- Traffic report: Death, War, Pestilence... Movies and TV
- WikiProject report: De-orphanning articles—a huge task but with a huge team of volunteers to help
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Your closure
After your decision at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Miss Tourism International, where you wrote the phrase Keep then stated there is "no consensus to delete," the nominator went back in to change the published verdict here as no consensus and reverted it again here when I corrected this. As a lengthy background, this nominator and I have been battling over what I consider his habit of improper nominations without doing any WP:BEFORE research, particularly around the subject of beauty pageants, but I've subsequently discovered this is a wholesale habit of his editing. So he's anticipating that I will take him to ANI about his editing practices, which I will probably have to do and is playing a petty little game to soften the accumulation of negative points against his series of nominations. Yes, we are down to counting how many Keeps he has against him vs how many no consensus decisions. That is why this is significant. So this what your wrote as your decision, he has changed it. I guess you can deal with this from here. Trackinfo (talk) 20:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)