Misplaced Pages

User talk:EChastain: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:35, 26 October 2014 editEChastain (talk | contribs)2,665 edits arbcom: re← Previous edit Revision as of 22:49, 26 October 2014 edit undoEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,239 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 84: Line 84:


@] There are no ] in ] supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. ] (]) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC) @] There are no ] in ] supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. ] (]) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
:There are. Read ]. Also see ]. Attempting dispute resolution. ] ] <small>Please &#123;&#123;]&#125;&#125;</small> 22:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:49, 26 October 2014

Welcome

Hello, EChastain, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

arbcom

You are clearly editing in response to Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_Gap_Task_Force. Please follow Misplaced Pages's guidelines and rules, specifically regarding WP:RS. You do not seem to be adhering to a neutral point of view. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

@User:EvergreenFir There are no reliable sources in Mansplaining supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. EChastain (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

There are. Read WP:LEAD. Also see Talk:Mansplaining#Meme. Attempting dispute resolution. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)