| Revision as of 00:52, 13 November 2014 editKhgtcv (talk | contribs)106 edits →Touchy area, gonna get yourself blocked/topic banned← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:02, 13 November 2014 edit undoDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits GamerGate general sanctions noticeNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Thanks for the advice. I haven't edited anything. I figured it was a touchy topic, so I thought I'd ask about it first. The BBC article was the first time I'd seen an undeniably reliable source flat-out state that the affairs happened. When I first came across the whole unfortunate #gamergate fiasco several weeks ago, it was unclear to me whether the affairs actually happened or not, and what exactly had been debunked. So I think the article could do some good by clarifying facts in a neutral way. --] (]) 00:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | Thanks for the advice. I haven't edited anything. I figured it was a touchy topic, so I thought I'd ask about it first. The BBC article was the first time I'd seen an undeniably reliable source flat-out state that the affairs happened. When I first came across the whole unfortunate #gamergate fiasco several weeks ago, it was unclear to me whether the affairs actually happened or not, and what exactly had been debunked. So I think the article could do some good by clarifying facts in a neutral way. --] (]) 00:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ==November 2014== | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A ] has authorised the use of ] for pages related to the ].<br>The details of these sanctions are described ]. | |||
| ] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. ] <small>]</small> 01:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | |||
| | icon size = 50px}} | |||
Revision as of 01:02, 13 November 2014
Leave me notes here
Khgtcv, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Khgtcv! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Misplaced Pages works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2014 (UTC) |
Touchy area, gonna get yourself blocked/topic banned
For this edit, people are absolutely touchy about Zoe Quinn, and WP:BLP policy certainly applies. I'd rather you not get blocked or topic banned. Trust me, you don't want to do this. I'd revert your edit and put your efforts into other avenues, not Zoe Quinn. Tutelary (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. I haven't edited anything. I figured it was a touchy topic, so I thought I'd ask about it first. The BBC article was the first time I'd seen an undeniably reliable source flat-out state that the affairs happened. When I first came across the whole unfortunate #gamergate fiasco several weeks ago, it was unclear to me whether the affairs actually happened or not, and what exactly had been debunked. So I think the article could do some good by clarifying facts in a neutral way. --Khgtcv (talk) 00:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Dreadstar ☥ 01:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)