User talk:Auerbachkeller: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:42, 15 November 2014 editAuerbachkeller (talk \| contribs)181 edits →Hi ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:46, 15 November 2014 edit undoChrisGualtieri (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers457,369 edits →Hi: reNext edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*Auerbachkeller, I appreciate the note you left. Ryulong removed it, which means (to us Misplaced Pages editors) that he read it. That he chose not to answer it on his talk page, ah well. At any rate, I suggest you don't bring this up again on his talk page: he's not going to change his mind and, as odd as it may seem, he may claim you're harassing him.<p>{{U\|Ryulong}}, I'm beginning to have serious questions about your judgment; calling Auerbach's piece "divisive" is nonsensical since every single article on this topic seems to be divisive, and his is certainly more nuanced than some others (you may disagree with the contents, of course). Besides, your invocation of the c-word makes little sense either. Thank you, ] (]) 16:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)		*Auerbachkeller, I appreciate the note you left. Ryulong removed it, which means (to us Misplaced Pages editors) that he read it. That he chose not to answer it on his talk page, ah well. At any rate, I suggest you don't bring this up again on his talk page: he's not going to change his mind and, as odd as it may seem, he may claim you're harassing him.<p>{{U\|Ryulong}}, I'm beginning to have serious questions about your judgment; calling Auerbach's piece "divisive" is nonsensical since every single article on this topic seems to be divisive, and his is certainly more nuanced than some others (you may disagree with the contents, of course). Besides, your invocation of the c-word makes little sense either. Thank you, ] (]) 16:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
	**{{U\|Drmies}}, Thank you for the tips, I will not comment on his page. On the other hand, I'm not thrilled with Ryulong's statement that I "threatened" him (nor with his bizarre appeal to Wales, but that much is his right). I've made this known to him above. This reinforces my belief that he is out to get me for some incomprehensible reason, and that this may continue to be a problem for me. I would also like to ask how I can make a statement on the Gamergate page arbitration request concerning this matter, since, as you say, it seems likely Ryulong is not going to change his mind. I seem to be unable to add a new section (not being "confirmed"?) ] (]) 17:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)		**{{U\|Drmies}}, Thank you for the tips, I will not comment on his page. On the other hand, I'm not thrilled with Ryulong's statement that I "threatened" him (nor with his bizarre appeal to Wales, but that much is his right). I've made this known to him above. This reinforces my belief that he is out to get me for some incomprehensible reason, and that this may continue to be a problem for me. I would also like to ask how I can make a statement on the Gamergate page arbitration request concerning this matter, since, as you say, it seems likely Ryulong is not going to change his mind. I seem to be unable to add a new section (not being "confirmed"?) ] (]) 17:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

			:::* Sorry to hear that he is troubling you, sir. Ryulong has definitely violated normal Misplaced Pages's civility tenants by repeatedly announcing your post as a "threat", but few editors want to get involved with Ryulong. This Gamergate controversy is fast becoming one of the biggest messes in our histor and rather than trying to be a pillar of stability, Ryulong seems to be fueling the conflict with such behavior. ] (]) 17:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:46, 15 November 2014

Hi

I'm sorry you felt you were paraphrased wrong via my paraphrasing of Elias Isquith's piece but do not threaten me again. I have no agenda no matter what the assholes trying to discredit me on Reddit say about me. You wrote a divisive piece. Someone criticized you. I wrote about that criticism and may have been inaccurate. Get over it or make a correction that can be cited and used as a counterpoint. I am not going to abide by your ridiculous demands that I never write about you again. For a journalist you're certainly very adamant that people who you think are against you be censored.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Ryulong, I would like you to explain how I "threatened" and "demanded" anything. I made a polite request (the title used "Please", even) that seemed quite reasonable in light of what had happened. And now I politely ask that you rescind your statement that I "threatened" and "demanded" things of you. Thank you. Auerbachkeller (talk) 17:22, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi David, looks like you've met one of Misplaced Pages bullies who BTW forgot to tell you that he has started a new thread about you at Jimbo's talk page. 198.99.224.134 (talk) 16:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Auerbachkeller, I appreciate the note you left. Ryulong removed it, which means (to us Misplaced Pages editors) that he read it. That he chose not to answer it on his talk page, ah well. At any rate, I suggest you don't bring this up again on his talk page: he's not going to change his mind and, as odd as it may seem, he may claim you're harassing him.
Ryulong, I'm beginning to have serious questions about your judgment; calling Auerbach's piece "divisive" is nonsensical since every single article on this topic seems to be divisive, and his is certainly more nuanced than some others (you may disagree with the contents, of course). Besides, your invocation of the c-word makes little sense either. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Drmies, Thank you for the tips, I will not comment on his page. On the other hand, I'm not thrilled with Ryulong's statement that I "threatened" him (nor with his bizarre appeal to Wales, but that much is his right). I've made this known to him above. This reinforces my belief that he is out to get me for some incomprehensible reason, and that this may continue to be a problem for me. I would also like to ask how I can make a statement on the Gamergate page arbitration request concerning this matter, since, as you say, it seems likely Ryulong is not going to change his mind. I seem to be unable to add a new section (not being "confirmed"?) Auerbachkeller (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that he is troubling you, sir. Ryulong has definitely violated normal Misplaced Pages's civility tenants by repeatedly announcing your post as a "threat", but few editors want to get involved with Ryulong. This Gamergate controversy is fast becoming one of the biggest messes in our histor and rather than trying to be a pillar of stability, Ryulong seems to be fueling the conflict with such behavior. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:42, 15 November 2014 editAuerbachkeller (talk \| contribs)181 edits →Hi ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:46, 15 November 2014 edit undoChrisGualtieri (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers457,369 edits →Hi: reNext edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*Auerbachkeller, I appreciate the note you left. Ryulong removed it, which means (to us Misplaced Pages editors) that he read it. That he chose not to answer it on his talk page, ah well. At any rate, I suggest you don't bring this up again on his talk page: he's not going to change his mind and, as odd as it may seem, he may claim you're harassing him.<p>{{U\|Ryulong}}, I'm beginning to have serious questions about your judgment; calling Auerbach's piece "divisive" is nonsensical since every single article on this topic seems to be divisive, and his is certainly more nuanced than some others (you may disagree with the contents, of course). Besides, your invocation of the c-word makes little sense either. Thank you, ] (]) 16:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)		*Auerbachkeller, I appreciate the note you left. Ryulong removed it, which means (to us Misplaced Pages editors) that he read it. That he chose not to answer it on his talk page, ah well. At any rate, I suggest you don't bring this up again on his talk page: he's not going to change his mind and, as odd as it may seem, he may claim you're harassing him.<p>{{U\|Ryulong}}, I'm beginning to have serious questions about your judgment; calling Auerbach's piece "divisive" is nonsensical since every single article on this topic seems to be divisive, and his is certainly more nuanced than some others (you may disagree with the contents, of course). Besides, your invocation of the c-word makes little sense either. Thank you, ] (]) 16:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
	**{{U\|Drmies}}, Thank you for the tips, I will not comment on his page. On the other hand, I'm not thrilled with Ryulong's statement that I "threatened" him (nor with his bizarre appeal to Wales, but that much is his right). I've made this known to him above. This reinforces my belief that he is out to get me for some incomprehensible reason, and that this may continue to be a problem for me. I would also like to ask how I can make a statement on the Gamergate page arbitration request concerning this matter, since, as you say, it seems likely Ryulong is not going to change his mind. I seem to be unable to add a new section (not being "confirmed"?) ] (]) 17:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)		**{{U\|Drmies}}, Thank you for the tips, I will not comment on his page. On the other hand, I'm not thrilled with Ryulong's statement that I "threatened" him (nor with his bizarre appeal to Wales, but that much is his right). I've made this known to him above. This reinforces my belief that he is out to get me for some incomprehensible reason, and that this may continue to be a problem for me. I would also like to ask how I can make a statement on the Gamergate page arbitration request concerning this matter, since, as you say, it seems likely Ryulong is not going to change his mind. I seem to be unable to add a new section (not being "confirmed"?) ] (]) 17:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

			:::* Sorry to hear that he is troubling you, sir. Ryulong has definitely violated normal Misplaced Pages's civility tenants by repeatedly announcing your post as a "threat", but few editors want to get involved with Ryulong. This Gamergate controversy is fast becoming one of the biggest messes in our histor and rather than trying to be a pillar of stability, Ryulong seems to be fueling the conflict with such behavior. ] (]) 17:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)