| Revision as of 17:30, 1 January 2007 editRedpointist (talk | contribs)70 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:20, 27 November 2014 edit undoLadislav Mecir (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,014 edits Neutrality dispute | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Bitcoin lead section neutrality dispute== | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, {{U|Redpointist}}, welcome to the Misplaced Pages. There is an ongoing neutrality dispute at ] related to the contents of the lead section, especially to the contents of its paragraph #4, which you just edited. Therefore, until the consensus is reached, you are supposed and welcome to propose your changes (you can propose the complete wording of the paragraph if you prefer) at the talk page instead of directly editing the contents. Once the dispute is closed, the consensual changes will be applied. I have to revert your changes at the main page until then, but, please, do not forget to take part in the dispute, if you do not want your opinion to be ignored. Thank you. ] (]) 17:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Please do not add inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did in ]}}. ] nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See ] and ] for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the ] to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:Spam --> -- ] 00:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did in ]}}. It is considered ], and ] a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. <!-- Template:Spam2 --> -- ] 00:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| >>>>>How is this an inappropriate link? Have you even looked at it? It's directly relavant and contains articles and discussions on the topics of the Lord of the Rings, Middle Earth, and Tolkien. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please read the article on the ]. - ] 02:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| On second thought, I think Jmax's ] link is more on target. Specifically ], which answers your question above. - ] 02:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| >>>>Again, discussions not applicable to wikipedia are contained and are perfectly acceptable for an external link. | |||
Latest revision as of 17:20, 27 November 2014
Bitcoin lead section neutrality dispute
Hi, Redpointist, welcome to the Misplaced Pages. There is an ongoing neutrality dispute at Talk:Bitcoin#Achieving neutral point of view in note #7 related to the contents of the lead section, especially to the contents of its paragraph #4, which you just edited. Therefore, until the consensus is reached, you are supposed and welcome to propose your changes (you can propose the complete wording of the paragraph if you prefer) at the talk page instead of directly editing the contents. Once the dispute is closed, the consensual changes will be applied. I have to revert your changes at the main page until then, but, please, do not forget to take part in the dispute, if you do not want your opinion to be ignored. Thank you. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 17:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)