Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:31, 30 November 2014

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Independent Information

This page is unambiguously promotional.However, every time I try and make a page that isn't promotional you delete me while I'm making the page. I'm trying to create a page about my company as a lot of my interns coming from england find it hard to understand the russian website. The page is factual not promotional. Promotional implies bias which it isn't. If you feel I written biased info tell where it is and I'll delete it. I keep having my page deleted by different "monitors" and so I'm to explain myself ever time. Could please help/ Advise me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yours Independent informtion

Titles of Refs

Re: Talk page FAQs

What the Heck

My information was true considering the fact that a news report confirmed it, so they had no business deleting it, because either way it was true,they probably didn't even try searching it up! Here's the report: http://www.newsnet5.com/entertainment/celebrity/nicki-minaj-gets-animated-for-steven-universe_09416171

If they were following the rules then they could have easily done some research to see if it was true or not. I did.So I hope they got a notification too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talk • contribs)

The talk page didn't have any one talking about confirmation on dates that's why I didn't bother! and I did give a source that apparently wasn't "reliable" but yet a News website confirmed it, making what I wrote true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talk • contribs)

Thank you

Thank you! that's all I wanted! fans have been waiting for this information for 3 months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talk • contribs)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, EvergreenFir. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSDarrow (talk • contribs)

GGTF Arbcom case comment

Howdy. Forgive me, but your comment at 20:00 November 15, 2014 on the GGTF Arbcom talkpage with the words "master baiter", caused me to burst into hysterical laughter. GoodDay (talk) 02:15, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

@GoodDay: Glad it gave someone a laugh! It was completely my intent. :D EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Revert

Yeah, it was on the wrong page, and when I tried to revert, couldn't do it because you had already made an intervening edit. :/ —Neotarf (talk) 05:30, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

@Neotarf: Lol I was wondering. Feel free to delete my comment if you wish to revert. :) EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Naw, it's an arb page, best not to edit someone else's comment, even if it makes sense. But I see you have taken care of it already. —Neotarf (talk) 06:50, 16 November 2014 (UTC) It's the autocomplete on my browser address window, always a page or two behind, but still the fastest way to find a case. (BTW, your ping didn't work) —Neotarf (talk) 06:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

@Neotarf: odd, do you have ping notifications turned off? EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 07:03, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Concerning my edit on the Transgender page

Hello, and thanks for reviewing my edit.

You undid my revision on the Transgender page today saying that I was in good faith but did not source it. This is true, so I'm sorry for that. However, I just wanted to be clear that my revision is based on my own personal history and studies of the topic (I am trans* myself), so I just wanted to mention that to you. I didn't think I would have to source the information I added (as what I wrote was basically general knowledge from anyone who knows the topic) but, of course, I understand your reversion.

I may contribute the same information again in the future, but next time with source(s).

Thanks again, msorge (talk) 18:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Population data

Please see this discussion. It relates to an "pending" edit you just approved. Thanks.

Talk:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States#Problem_with_the_main_SSM_state_table Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Bmclaughlin9: Thank you. I'll check it out. Just to explain, I approved the edit because it was not vandalism didn't appear to violate any of the guidelines on WP:REVIEWER. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Thread Closed

Sorry about that, got confused on that one. The sources say "X did something". That isn't interpretation, and it's on the title. The primary source the source uses to assert that claim doesn't claim that it's doxxing or claim affiliation to anyone. It claims it's easy to find information. How is the source that just changed what someone said and attribute an affiliation to it reliable? How is it not about the reliability of said sources? --Zakkarum (talk) 22:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Zakkarum: per your comments, I have asked an admin related to the GamerGate sanctions enforcement to review my closing of that discussion. I asked that if they feel I closed it improperly to undo my close so that discussion may continue. To be clear, I think the discussion is fine per se, just in the wrong location. Also, reliable sources can be wrong. That doesn't make them unreliable, just wrong in this one instance. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for that. A reliable source being deliberately wrong in one occasion might be a show of bias. Or that it isn't reliable, period. When you distort one words to try and blame someone, you are either unreliable or biased, IMO. I tried to have the talk somewhere else, but they pointed me to that page. --Zakkarum (talk) 22:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Talk page reference lists

Friendly request: please try to use {{reflist-talk}} when using references on talk pages. Thank you! Testing EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:40, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 11, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm 22:29, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

You forgot the +C!

In your mathematics user box, you missed out the constant of integration.HalfHat 12:00, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Keep up the work - let's just say it - fighting the power...

Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 15:23, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Sommer's reverts and accusations

Sorry, but my edits weren't even directed at you. Third-parties that are characterizing Sommers as "anti-femminist" are acting like TERFs by excluding her. Don't think that has much to do with you unless you are citing yourself as a reliable source. You also reverted more than 1 edit and created a mess on talk. Please clean it up yourself without reverting my edits. Chheers. --DHeyward (talk) 03:31, 30 November 2014 (UTC)