Revision as of 16:16, 13 July 2006 editHagiographer (talk | contribs)182 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:21, 13 July 2006 edit undoRichardWeiss (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users75,870 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
This is an *example*! Do not leave your report here - copy and paste it BELOW this line!!--> | This is an *example*! Do not leave your report here - copy and paste it BELOW this line!!--> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
==]== | ==] and ]== | ||
] | ] | ||
SqueakBox is placed on personal attack parole with a decision that explicitly states that "This remedy is to be interpreted broadly to include unwarranted assumptions of bad faith". However in the past few days he has not stopped insulting me and accusing me of being a sock puppet of ], although I registered my identity far before that user was blocked by the same case that SqueakBox. This day he has posted this message in which he shows a complete lack of respect towards me and claims that an edit of mine is a "crying shame". Moreover, he claims he's going to take me to an RfC or to the ArbCom, what is a disrespectful sample of assuming bad faith. ] 14:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | SqueakBox is placed on personal attack parole with a decision that explicitly states that "This remedy is to be interpreted broadly to include unwarranted assumptions of bad faith". However in the past few days he has not stopped insulting me and accusing me of being a sock puppet of ], although I registered my identity far before that user was blocked by the same case that SqueakBox. This day he has posted this message in which he shows a complete lack of respect towards me and claims that an edit of mine is a "crying shame". Moreover, he claims he's going to take me to an RfC or to the ArbCom, what is a disrespectful sample of assuming bad faith. ] 14:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
summary in this edit is almost identical tohttp://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Zapatancas&diff=prev&oldid=19312435] it isnt credible that this user is other than Zapatancas, ] 16:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
=== Recent attack === | === Recent attack === |
Revision as of 16:21, 13 July 2006
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Administrators' (archives, search) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
349 | 350 | 351 | 352 | 353 | 354 | 355 | 356 | 357 | 358 |
359 | 360 | 361 | 362 | 363 | 364 | 365 | 366 | 367 | 368 |
Incidents (archives, search) | |||||||||
1156 | 1157 | 1158 | 1159 | 1160 | 1161 | 1162 | 1163 | 1164 | 1165 |
1166 | 1167 | 1168 | 1169 | 1170 | 1171 | 1172 | 1173 | 1174 | 1175 |
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search) | |||||||||
472 | 473 | 474 | 475 | 476 | 477 | 478 | 479 | 480 | 481 |
482 | 483 | 484 | 485 | 486 | 487 | 488 | 489 | 490 | 491 |
Arbitration enforcement (archives) | |||||||||
328 | 329 | 330 | 331 | 332 | 333 | 334 | 335 | 336 | 337 |
338 | 339 | 340 | 341 | 342 | 343 | 344 | 345 | 346 | 347 |
Other links | |||||||||
- ]
This is a message board for coordinating and discussing enforcement of Arbitration Committee decisions. Administrators are needed to help enforce ArbCom decisions. Any user is welcome to request help here if it involves the violation of an ArbCom decision. Please make your comments concise. Administrators are less likely to pay attention to long diatribes.
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement/Archive1. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Are you sure this is the page you are looking for?
This page only involves violations of final Arbitration Committee decisions.
- Reporting of Three-revert rule violations is done on the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR (WP:AN/3RR). Even if an editor has an Arbitration ruling about reverts, you will likely get a quicker response there.
- Reporting of other types of incidents (e.g. blocked users evading blocks, etc) that do not involve the Arbitration Committee is done on the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (WP:AN/I).
- To request specific assistance from an administrator, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for administrator attention. To request assistance from a specific administrator, see ].
- If you are blocked, please contact the blocking admin via email (navigate to their userpage and click email this user).
- To request arbitration, please go to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration.
Enforcement
Enforcement requests against users should be based on the principles and decisions in their Arbitration case.
Please be aware that these pages aren't the place to bring disputes over content. Arbitration Committee decisions are generally about behavior, not content. Very few editors have content dispute prohibitions. Requests for Comments is still the best place to hash out content disputes.
Most editors under ArbCom sanction are neither trolls nor vandals and should be treated with the same respect as any other editor. We should still Assume Good Faith. Arbitration Committee decisions are designed to be coercive, not punitive. Gaming the system at editors under ArbCom sanction is about as civilized at poking sticks at caged animals. Please do not post slurs of any kind on this page, and note that any messages that egregiously violate Misplaced Pages's civility or personal attacks policies will be paraphrased and, if reinserted, will be deleted.
If an Arbitration case has not been finalized, it is not enforcable. In that case, bad behavior should be reported on WP:AN/I and you should consider adding the behavior to the /Evidence page of the Arbitration case.
Note to administrators: Arbitration Committee decisions are the last stop of dispute resolution. ArbCom has already decided that certain types of behavior by these users is not constructive to our purpose of building an encyclopedia. If you participate on this page you should be prepared to mete out potentially long term bans and you should expect reactive behavior from those banned. The enforcement mechanisms listed in each individual case should be constructed liberally in order to protect Misplaced Pages and keep it running efficiently. Not all enforcement requests will show behavior restricted by ArbCom. It may, however, violate other Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines which you may use administrative discretion to deal with.
Using this page
Edit this section. Please put new requests above old requests and below the sample template. A sample template is provided, please use copy and paste, do not edit the template.
Be prepared with:
- Diffs showing the violating behavior
- Point to the final decision in their Arbitration case, a list with summary disposition is at WP:AER
- Clear and brief summary relation of how this behavior is linked to the principles, findings of fact, remedies, and/or enforcement mechanism of the arbitration case.
Be advised to:
- Notify the user at his or her user talk page.
Edit this section for new requests
User:SqueakBox and User:Zapatancas
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas
SqueakBox is placed on personal attack parole with a decision that explicitly states that "This remedy is to be interpreted broadly to include unwarranted assumptions of bad faith". However in the past few days he has not stopped insulting me and accusing me of being a sock puppet of User:Zapatancas, although I registered my identity far before that user was blocked by the same case that SqueakBox. This day he has posted this message in which he shows a complete lack of respect towards me and claims that an edit of mine is a "crying shame". Moreover, he claims he's going to take me to an RfC or to the ArbCom, what is a disrespectful sample of assuming bad faith. Hagiographer 14:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
The edit summary in this edit is almost identical tohttp://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Zapatancas&diff=prev&oldid=19312435] it isnt credible that this user is other than Zapatancas, SqueakBox 16:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Recent attack
SqueakBox has made this edit posting the insult "vandal troll" against me. Hagiographer 15:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
You just vandalised my user page so I was ttelling the truth. Stop harrassing me, Zapatancas. I haver a right to have you not vandalsiing my userr pager and spewing your hatered of me. just stop trying top create a reaction! SqueakBox 15:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Suspecion of sock puppettry
I believe that User:Skanking is a sock puppet of SqueakBox. It was created in April, when the case against SqueakBox had already been posted. His user page is very similar to that of SqueakBox and so are his edits, related to subject like Honduras or La Ceiba or Zapatero . He probably created it to avoid the one month ban imposed on him by the arbitration committee. The message below (Ras Bily is the sign of User:Skanking), posted in the arbitration enforcemente although it does not belong here as I'm not affected by any arbcom decision adds aditional evidence. Why is he so coordinated with SqueakBox? Hagiographer 16:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Hagiographer has vandalised SqueakBox thrice and keeps altering another users comments on the Zapatero page. Can someone get him to stop? Ras Billy I 15:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Leyasu
User:Leyasu is on revert patrol via ArbCom decision.
I have good reason to belive User:86.132.134.97 is Leyasu, that he is edit warring with Deathrocker, compare edits of Deathrocker and IP
- See the RFAr on Deathrocker evidence history, where User:86.132.134.145, User:86.132.135.23, and User:Leyasu1 posting and editing the history, referring to themselves as being leyasu. Now, given that, 86.132.134.97, 86.132.134.145, and 86.132.135.23 are all dynamic IPs and host{IP}.range86-132.btcentralplus.com is the reverse DNS format of each.
For this, and the fact that the IP is reverting Deathrocker in numerous places, with lots of "reverting banned user" and citing tons of WP:XXX templates while doing so, this IP is most likely leyasu violating revert patrol and his 3 month block (3RR too, but I'm reporting that on the 3RR board) Kevin_b_er 00:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Other IPs I blocked tonight with exact same motives: 86.132.131.190 and 86.132.135.143. Circeus 01:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- To clarify, Circeus has indefinitely blocked Leyasu's main account; and this is also being discussed on WP:AN/I. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 00:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
User:SqueakBox and User:Zapatancas
SqueakBox (talk · contribs) is placed on personal attack parole. The final decision in their case is here: here. He has recently posted this insulting message by which he says that User:Hagiographer must be a sock puppet of mine as his English messages are written in poor Spanish just like those by me. As I explained in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas/Evidence, SqueakBox has frequently criticized unpleasently my English as I am a native speaker of Spanish. Zapatancas 15:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
As is Zapatancas (talk · contribs). Are you also Hagiographer (talk · contribs)? i believe you are and urge the arbcom to investigate and do a check user test as if he is Hagiographer he clearly is breaking the arbcom final decision. Calling my post insulting is breaking his no attack parole. i am certainly not attacking either zapatancas or Hagiographer but by describing my question and conclusions as insulting he is again engaged in attacking me. He has insulted my English and Spanish in the past, I have no issues with him having poor English, i merely pointed it out in my response as to why I believe Zapatancas is Hagiographer. I certainly dont claim or even believe my written Spanish is any better than his written English, and indeed for a Spaniard living in Madrid Zapatancasd shows a good command of English but he doesnt have a native command of the language, SqueakBox 18:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
As of Monday morning Zapatancas has made massive changes to all the Zapatero articles, reverting them back to his version, using his socklpuppet Hagiographer, SqueakBox 12:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Checkuser is unable to confirm or refute the claim of sock puppetry. I'm continuing to investigate. --Tony Sidaway 11:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
RK 2
RK (talk · contribs) is currently under several restrictions for 12 months following Apr 7 2005, see http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/RK_2#Remedies These restrictions include “RK is limited to one revert per twenty-four hour period on material directly or indirectly related to Jews and/or Judaism for a period of twelve months, with violations treated as violations of the three-revert rule and also resetting the twelve-month period. Determing what is directly or indirectly related shall be left to the discretion of the administrators." Another restriction he is under is "RK is placed on standard personal attack parole for twelve months. If he makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be personal attacks, then he shall be temp-banned for a short time of up to one week, and the twelve month period shall be reset.".
He has violated these restrictions and has had his 12 month period reset on December 23, 2005 see http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive58#User_RK
On January 15, 2006 he violated those restrictions again and was blocked for 4 days and had his 12 month period reset. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive66#User_RK
On May 25, 2006 he violated these restrictions again and was blocked for 3 days and his 12 month ban reset. See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#RK
He has now violated the no personal attacks section with this edit by saying that about a new editor who was probably not aware of any wikipedia policies "There is more than a small chance that he may (literally) be suffering from psychosis...clinical sign of mental disturbace...mental disturbance" and although he edited it in the next edit to just say "emotional disorder" that still constitutes as a personal attack.
This is his 5th violaton, I am therefore blocking him for one week and reseting the 12 month period. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Beckjord
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Beckjord states that Beckjord is banned from Misplaced Pages for one year, and is also prohibited from editing Bigfoot and related articles. However, when the case closed. Beckjord clearly stated that he does not intend to abide by the decision , and has continued to edit in violation of his ban.
Since being banned, Beckjord has made dozens of edits from various anonymous IPs in violation of his ban, including, but not limited to, the following:
Bigfoot
- 207.200.116.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log):
- 64.12.116.198 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log):
- 205.208.227.46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log):
Talk:Bigfoot
- 205.208.227.46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log):
- 207.200.116.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log):
Jon-Erik Beckjord
- 207.200.116.7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log):
- 205.208.227.46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log):
Constantine Conspiracy...Doc/Ril
I seem to have entered theAuthentic Matthew mess! I used http://pedia.nodeworks.com/A/AU/AUT/Authentic_Matthew/ (a big mistake)! I am not able to defend myself against DocUser:-Ril- ! Would an admin please look into this very bad situation --MeBee 02:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Could you explain the situation a little more clearly, please? It's really very unclear what your issue is. Zetawoof 06:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)