| Revision as of 01:12, 2 December 2014 editLagoonaville (talk | contribs)130 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:21, 2 December 2014 edit undoVanishedUser sdu8asdasd (talk | contribs)31,778 edits →ARCA: ffs, keep it on the talk page, also, other people have things to do in real life. do not post here again.Next edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| Also before you make further comments on the clarifications and appeals page please ensure that you read the pink box at the top of the page so you know the expectations for that page. Thanks, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | Also before you make further comments on the clarifications and appeals page please ensure that you read the pink box at the top of the page so you know the expectations for that page. Thanks, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| I am extremely appalled by your behavior and other editors on that forum. Do I have to ask your permission before editing? You have not responded to the draft that I proposed. You have continued to be bias towards all of my edits. ] (]) 01:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:21, 2 December 2014
|
| This is VanishedUser sdu8asdasd's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
A kitten for you!
For assuming good faith :)
Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- I almost fell into the same trap as you did, but after one of the sources in the old version of the article clearly showed that one of the roles wasn't as an uncredited extra, I dug a little deeper. As such, AGF was not hard in this case. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:53, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Question
Apologise in advance if I am doing this wrong, I am new to this. So for to understand how would I properly link a movie/play title from a given article to an outside page showing proof of the claim?Sindanda (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sindanda: The simple answer is that we don't directly link to articles in that manner. In this situation, we would use <ref>Insert web link here</ref> to the right of the movie the person had a role in; and, if there are two square brackets either end of the movie's title (which is a wikilink), you make sure that you do not put that reference inside those brackets, but next to them. I strongly suggest you go and read Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for more specific details, particularly with regards to reference formatting (it is generally frowned upon to just have a raw link on its own), and I would also recommend that you familiarize yourself with WP:RS, which IMDB does not satisfy. I thank you for asking for assistance, and for also heeding my advice about how to sign posts correctly. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Lukeno94: Thank you for pointing that out, it's a lot to take in so guiding suggestions are always welcome. I have read now the WP:RS and see your point. So to confirm I understand this all correctly. Other than the rare external link it would be better that any film/play which one wishes to link themselves to be in the appropriate Wiki database. That way so long as the given page is in line with WP:RS than the actor(s) page is safe as it is citing an already confirmed wiki page? Sorry again for this, I do read the help material but I have always learned better via a conversation style forum. :) Sindanda (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- To reference something in line with WP:RS, you would be looking for an external article on a website that is known to be fairly reliable in its area. So, for example, something like the BBC, or the Guardian would be good examples of generally reliable references; however, there are also references that are reliable for their subject areas. Generally, we avoid blogs (with a few notable exceptions), Wikis, fan sites and tabloid newspapers as references, particularly in a WP:BLP, which Schooley's article is classified as. Local-scale sources (so county or town/city specific) are capable of being reliable (and, indeed, they often are), but they do not count towards notability (again, with a few exceptions, like the New York Times, for example). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Genius
Your comment at Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/2014_U.S._and_allies_versus_Islamic_State_hostilities_and_conflicts really cheered me up. 
Thank you Gregkaye ✍♪ 17:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Glad you liked it. :) I feel that it is a fairly accurate description of that mess of an article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
ARCA
Re -- your comment would be more helpful to the committee if you'd be willing to take the time to wikilink the ANI threads. NE Ent 15:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Good point, shall go and do so. I have extremely limited experience with ARCA (which is probably a good thing!) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Definitely a good thing! In general, in any wiki dispute resolution forum diffs tend to be more effective than words alone. NE Ent 15:50, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Also before you make further comments on the clarifications and appeals page please ensure that you read the pink box at the top of the page so you know the expectations for that page. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)