| Revision as of 16:00, 23 November 2014 editDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits →Thank you: Re← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:44, 11 December 2014 edit undoDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{notice|If you cannot post here due to page protection, post at ]}} | |||
| == |
== Thank you == | ||
| I just want to thank you for ] (I saw that you wrote it mostly; and other similar articles as well). I also see (on the talk page) that there was a discussion about the credibility of sources, so what's the final word regarding that? Best wishes. -- ] (]) 13:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I |
:What discussion on the sources? I used for the most part academic publishers when I rewrote the article, and to not recall anyone questioning them? ] (]) 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Ping == | |||
| ::Dealt with. ] (]) 23:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{ping|OccultZone}} I have sent you an email. | |||
| :::Thanks, Nick. "Head" and "platter" come to mind, and I don't mean that of DS. - ] (]) 00:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Also thanks Nick, will raise the next few to your integrity, ] (]) 00:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{ping|Drmies}} Would you be so kind as to delete page please, or remove the comment from Nangparbat. Thanks. ] (]) 14:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Too funny == | |||
| So I admit to being a sock, and now I surely must have more? After all, why else admit to being a sock lulz, but look at the evidence, from TG, seems my super secret sock edited Crimes against humanity under Communist regimes, and fuck me, so did I, fair enough it was about years before me, but why let facts ruin a good story, I added an internal to an article I had just created, ], cos this encyclopedia did not have an article on it. Go figure, and people wonder, why? ] (]) 00:31, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Probably best to let it drop, DS. The point has been made and there are plenty of people who would support your return here. "Ranting" in public about obvious injustices, however cathartic, is likely to work against any appeal to BASC. Especially since it now seems that even words such as "dramatic" are considered to be offensive. - ] (]) 00:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Mailed BASC, I think, connection dropped out, to manny torrents running off my proxy I suspect {{smiley}} I admitted my fault, not happy the usual suspects, and you know who they are, seems uber focused on proving I was a cunt twice at the same time, if I was, do those eejits not get I would fess up to that as well? Sorry, but this is an obvious poison the well, OI BASCC, look he has another sock hid away. ] (]) 00:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::What Sitush said. You have to expect that some people don't like you, and some might take any situation they can to kick you when you are down. You've been honest, personally I'm glad. While I might be disappointed you ''were'' a sock, that is offset by the fact that I respect that you admitted it, accepted the punishment, and seeking to come back using the system proper. Don't worry what a detractor says, they can't take the truth away with their assumptions and pointy comments. Don't empower them by responding. ] - ] 00:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{ping|Dennis Brown}} You`re right, but Russavia is really getting on my tits, articles I created for deletion. ] (]) 14:29, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::The best place to deal with it is there at Commons. As he can't edit here due to being banned and beating the drum here may cast you in a negative light in the eyes of some. You don't need the extra scrutiny here at enwp at this particular moment in time. ] - ] 14:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Tagging undone. ] (]) 16:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| I just want to thank you for ] (I saw that you wrote it mostly; and other similar articles as well). I also see (on the talk page) that there was a discussion about the credibility of sources, so what's the final word regarding that? Best wishes. -- ] (]) 13:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :What discussion on the sources? I used for the most part academic publishers when I rewrote the article, and to not recall anyone questioning them? ] (]) 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:44, 11 December 2014
Thank you
I just want to thank you for this article (I saw that you wrote it mostly; and other similar articles as well). I also see (on the talk page) that there was a discussion about the credibility of sources, so what's the final word regarding that? Best wishes. -- KWiki (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- What discussion on the sources? I used for the most part academic publishers when I rewrote the article, and to not recall anyone questioning them? Darkness Shines (talk) 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Ping
@OccultZone: I have sent you an email.
@Drmies: Would you be so kind as to delete this page please, or remove the comment from Nangparbat. Thanks. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC)