| Revision as of 11:19, 20 December 2014 editNick-D (talk | contribs)Administrators106,110 edits →WWII: ANI← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:07, 20 December 2014 edit undoVaulter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,662 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 11:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC) | ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 11:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == December 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:07, 20 December 2014
E-960, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi E-960! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Misplaced Pages; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC) |
WWII
Hello E-960,
I saw you removed this picture from World War II article. Would it be possible for you to put it to a different spot instead of just removing it? This picture in this article is very important for Misplaced Pages:GLAM/BAnQ/Poirier Project I'm currently working on with National Archives since we are collecting some stats. All this to say can help me to find a spot for it. Thanks in advance. Best regards. Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
WP:ANI#Personal abuse and anti-Australian slurs by User:E-960
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nick-D (talk) 11:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Calidum 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)