Misplaced Pages

Talk:Multicultural London English: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:02, 16 July 2006 edit213.40.3.65 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 14:04, 16 July 2006 edit undoCaptainSurrey (talk | contribs)242 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:


::: Well, aren't you a socialist, namby pamby little scumbag! Go eat some sulpheric acid, for god's sake. ::: Well, aren't you a socialist, namby pamby little scumbag! Go eat some sulpheric acid, for god's sake.
--] 14:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:04, 16 July 2006

This article is clearly POV based in favour of namby-pamby liberal sociology. I demand that a counter argument be presented that offers some counter evidence that Jafaican is just a natural merging of existing diverse language cultures in London. I am quite aware that many of these little punks ARE trying to 'be cool' with this stupid little gangster talk.--CaptainSurrey 19:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

The article is not POV, it's simply based on an article which referred to research done by Queen Mary College. If you want a counter argument to be presented, find a reliable source and put it in the text, but don't delete a verifiable source just because you don't like it, that's censorship. If you remove that section again I'll report you to a moderator. Also, if you're gonna put something in, it had better be a damn good source and not some random blog or guestbook. Mackan 14:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I never altered the page. Don't accuse me of doing that; I'm certainly not that stupid. I may have gripes about its twisted-liberal theme, but I'm no vandal.--CaptainSurrey 19:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I assumed you were the anonymous user who twice removed a part of the article without stating any reason. Mackan 12:30, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
A counter argument to what? It's an inner-city dialect spoken by lower class scum of all races, it's the result of the melting pot in inner-cities and this dialect can be seen not only in London but also Birmingham and Bristol, to say that people that use it are just "doing it to be cool" is like saying people that speak with received pronunciation are "trying to be posh" which is rarely the case, it is the result of one's upbringing and the social environment around them. - AngryAfghan
Well, aren't you a socialist, namby pamby little scumbag! Go eat some sulpheric acid, for god's sake.

--CaptainSurrey 14:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)