Misplaced Pages

Social Justice in the Liberal State: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:12, 9 December 2005 edit69.37.39.36 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:30, 16 July 2006 edit undoSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits +{{cite webNext edit →
(38 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
]'''''Social justice in the liberal state''''' <ref>{{cite book
{{expansion}}
|id=ISBN 0300024398
|title=Social justice in the liberal state
|author=Ackerman, Bruce A.
|publisher=New Haven : Yale University Press
|year=1980
}}
</ref> is a book written by Bruce A. Ackerman, recipient of the French Order of Merit, <ref name="prel">{{cite web
|url=http://www.yale.edu/opa/newsr/04-03-01-03.all.html
|title=YALE News Release
|author=Office of Public Affairs
|publisher=Yale Law School
|date=]]
}}
</ref> Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and the author of fifteen books that have had a broad influence in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.law.yale.edu/faculty/BAckerman.htm
|title=Faculty
|author=Yale Law School
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> The book is an essay in political philosophy, <ref name="prel"/> a "new view" of the theoretical foundations of liberalism that will "challenge us to clarify our own implicit notions of liberal democracy." <ref>{{cite news
|author = Book Review Desk
|title = NOTABLE BOOKS OF THE YEAR
|work = Late City Final Edition
|pages = 14, Column 1, Section 7
|publisher = The New York Times
|date = ]]
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> Ackerman addresses the positive case for a liberalism that glorifies neither the state bureaucracy nor the private market. References to the sphere of relations among states are few, but the breadth of the attack on the fundamental issues of man and society is impressive. <ref> {{cite web
|url=http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19801201fabook13511/bruce-a-ackerman/social-justice-in-the-liberal-state.html
|author=Campbell, John C.
|year=1981
|title=Review: Social Justice in the Liberal State
|publisher=Council on Foreign Relations
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> To Ackerman, liberalism is a kind of structured conversation in which verbal negotiation among those with differing visions of the good life is an alternative to the exercise of naked power. <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/eps/PES-Yearbook/92_docs/Bull.HTM
|author=Bull, Barry L.
|year=1992
|title=THE CREOLIZATION OF LIBERALISM
|publisher=College of Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> Ackerman has mounted a profound challenge to contract thinking. It works, crudely, on the idea that the premises of a course of contract reasoning can be manipulated so as to yield (more or less) any conclusion that the theorist has some antecedent interest in producing. <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism-contemporary/
|title=Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract
|author=D'Agostino, Fred
|publisher=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University
|date=]]
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> The social contract is the contract which would be confirmed by the entire population, under ideal conditions, after perfect and complete consideration. <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/rawls.html
|title=The politics of John Rawls
|author=Treanor, Paul
|date=]]
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> Ackerman has offered a suggestion for determining whether any persons among a genetically diverse group are genetically disadvantaged. His suggestion is that, to be genetically undominated, a person must possess a set of abilities that permit him to pursue some life purpose that some persons have, with as much facility as any other person is able to pursue that life purpose. And Ackerman asserts that every person has a right to be genetically undominated. <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.wealthandwant.com/docs/Tideman_PJER.html
|title=Peace, Justice, and Economic Reform
|author=Tideman, Nicolaus
|publisher=Achenbaum, Wyneth; wealthandwant.com
|date=]]
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> The privatization of religious convictions is also strongly defended. Ackerman argues for a maximal separation doctrine in that religion does not have an appropriate place in the public realm of a liberal democracy. <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.du.edu/gsis/hrhw/volumes/2006/rieffer-2006.pdf
|format=PDF
|title=Religion, Politics and Human Rights
|author=Rieffer, Barbara Ann
|publisher=University of Denver
|year=2006
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> The book also briefly suggests <ref name="amar1">{{cite web
|url=http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/1984Choosing.pdf
|format=PDF
|title=93 Yale L.J. 1283
|author=Amar, Akhil Reed
|publisher=The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.
|date=]]
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> "responsive lotteries", <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/1994Consent.pdf
|format=PDF
|title=94 Colum. L. Rev. 457
|author=Amar, Akhil Reed
|date=]]
|publisher=Directors of The Columbia Law Review Association
|accessdate=2006-07-16
}}
</ref> prototypes of lottery voting as a way to decide issues, but leaves the question hanging in the air, inviting others to devote more serious thought to lottery voting.<ref name="amar1"/>


== Reference ==
'''''The Liberal State''''' is a book written by ] on the topic of ] given ] in ]. In this paper Ackerman gives an ] on how several principles, ], ], ], and ] can result in a ]al method that can determine the ] of the use of ] by an individual over a given ].
<references/>


== Summary of the book== == See also ==
*]
*]
*]
*]


== External links ==
Ackerman starts his argument with the idea that there are a ] amount of resources in society, and people will conflict over these scarce resources. The conflict arises over resources since a person must control their person and their immediate environment (to get food, etc.) to sustain life.
* at Yale University Press
;Related works
* at Universitetet i Oslos
* at Washington University in St. Louis
* at Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies
* at George Mason University
;Scholastic inclusion
* at Collegium Budapest Institute for Advanced Study
* at Lingnan University
* at University of Aberdeen
* at Colorodo Christian University


]
It is inevitable in a world of scarce resources in which a person will claim control over resources that another person has. The question is, how would such a conflict be resolved with a conscientious attempt at a reasonable answer?
]

One possible answer is to use power to attack the claimant. As well, the less power the person has, the more they stand to lose from argument; the more power the person has the more easily they can suppress the claimant. Ackerman assumes that instead of violence, the person will respond with an argument, with particular features to be discussed, as to why they should control the resources in question.

== Principles, building the argument ==

Ackerman hopes to build a blueprint of an argument method that can successfully be used to settle claims over resources. The assumption mentioned in the last section is that the parties will not use violence to suppress the speech of the other party. Ackerman's blueprint has four principles that, when used together, can lead to a successful discussion method to resolve resource conflicts.

=== Rationality ===

=== Consistency ===

=== Neutrality ===

=== Undominated equality ===

Revision as of 17:30, 16 July 2006

Social justice in the liberal state is a book written by Bruce A. Ackerman, recipient of the French Order of Merit, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and the author of fifteen books that have had a broad influence in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. The book is an essay in political philosophy, a "new view" of the theoretical foundations of liberalism that will "challenge us to clarify our own implicit notions of liberal democracy." Ackerman addresses the positive case for a liberalism that glorifies neither the state bureaucracy nor the private market. References to the sphere of relations among states are few, but the breadth of the attack on the fundamental issues of man and society is impressive. To Ackerman, liberalism is a kind of structured conversation in which verbal negotiation among those with differing visions of the good life is an alternative to the exercise of naked power. Ackerman has mounted a profound challenge to contract thinking. It works, crudely, on the idea that the premises of a course of contract reasoning can be manipulated so as to yield (more or less) any conclusion that the theorist has some antecedent interest in producing. The social contract is the contract which would be confirmed by the entire population, under ideal conditions, after perfect and complete consideration. Ackerman has offered a suggestion for determining whether any persons among a genetically diverse group are genetically disadvantaged. His suggestion is that, to be genetically undominated, a person must possess a set of abilities that permit him to pursue some life purpose that some persons have, with as much facility as any other person is able to pursue that life purpose. And Ackerman asserts that every person has a right to be genetically undominated. The privatization of religious convictions is also strongly defended. Ackerman argues for a maximal separation doctrine in that religion does not have an appropriate place in the public realm of a liberal democracy. The book also briefly suggests "responsive lotteries", prototypes of lottery voting as a way to decide issues, but leaves the question hanging in the air, inviting others to devote more serious thought to lottery voting.

Reference

  1. Ackerman, Bruce A. (1980). Social justice in the liberal state. New Haven : Yale University Press. ISBN 0300024398.
  2. ^ Office of Public Affairs (1 Mar2004). "YALE News Release". Yale Law School. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. Yale Law School. "Faculty". Retrieved 2006-07-16.
  4. Book Review Desk (30 Nov1980). "NOTABLE BOOKS OF THE YEAR". Late City Final Edition. The New York Times. pp. 14, Column 1, Section 7. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  5. Campbell, John C. (1981). "Review: Social Justice in the Liberal State". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 2006-07-16.
  6. Bull, Barry L. (1992). "THE CREOLIZATION OF LIBERALISM". College of Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved 2006-07-16.
  7. D'Agostino, Fred (8 Apr2003). "Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University. Retrieved 2006-07-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. Treanor, Paul (11 Jan2003). "The politics of John Rawls". Retrieved 2006-07-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. Tideman, Nicolaus (18 Mar1997). "Peace, Justice, and Economic Reform". Achenbaum, Wyneth; wealthandwant.com. Retrieved 2006-07-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. Rieffer, Barbara Ann (2006). "Religion, Politics and Human Rights" (PDF). University of Denver. Retrieved 2006-07-16.
  11. ^ Amar, Akhil Reed (Jun 1984). "93 Yale L.J. 1283" (PDF). The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. Retrieved 2006-07-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  12. Amar, Akhil Reed (Mar 1984). "94 Colum. L. Rev. 457" (PDF). Directors of The Columbia Law Review Association. Retrieved 2006-07-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

See also

External links

Related works
Scholastic inclusion
Categories: