Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:32, 16 July 2006

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's deletion policy.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.
Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion.

Gill Langley is a British zoologist and writer who specializes in animal rights and animal protection issues in relation to the use of animals in research. She is scientific consultant to the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) and the Dr. Hadwen Trust for Humane Research. She is a former member of the British government's Animal Procedures Committee, and a current member of the Replacement Advisory Group of the British National Centre for the Three Rs, founded by Lord Sainsbury. She is also a fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Langley is the author of Next of Kin (2006), a report on primate experimentation published by the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection with a foreword by primatologist Jane Goodall, Vegan Nutrition (1995), and editor of Animal Experimentation: The Consensus Changes (1990), a collection of essays on animal research by leading scientists and philosophers, including Mary Midgley.

Education

Langley studied physiology, cell biology and zoology for her bachelor's degree at Cambridge University's Department of Zoology, then gained her Ph.D in neurochemistry, also from Cambridge. She took up a position as a research fellow at Nottingham University, specializing in neurophysiology in cell culture.

Involvement in animal protection

Template:Alib Described as "not what some would regard as a typical animal rights campaigner," Langley is herself a former animal researcher who decided she could not justify the experiments her employment required her to conduct. She subsequently took up a position as scientific advisor to the BUAV.

She was a member of the Animal Procedures Committee for eight years, which advises the British Home Office on issues related to animal testing, and has acted as an advisor to the government on the introduction of the new European Union Chemicals legislation, REACH. She has served as a specialist consultant for the European Commission and for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). She was called as an expert witness in 2001 by the House of Lords Select Committee on Animals In Scientific Procedures during its inquiry into animal experimentation in the UK.

In April 2006, she was a member of the panel at the Oxford Union that debated whether "This house would not test on animals." Opposing the motion were Laurie Pycroft — who founded Pro-Test, which organized the debate — Sir Colin Blakemore, Professor John Stein and Professor Lord Robert Winston. Supporting the motion, along with Langley, were Dr Andrew Knight, Uri Geller and BUAV campaigns director Alistair Currie. The motion was defeated by 273 to 48.

Position on animal research

Langley's told The Guardian that she does not rule out animal testing entirely, but argues that the legislation supposed to protect the 2.7 million animals currently used each year in the UK is inadequate, and that more money should be invested in developing alternatives, such as in-vitro and clinical studies. She told the BBC: "When you know that other animals can feel pain and distress in the same ways that humans do, it is unethical to experiment on them." She argues that because the British government's budget for alternatives is subdivided into different areas, what each area receives is "barely enough to fund one research project."

She is particularly opposed to the use of non-human primates in xenotransplantation, where pig organs are grafted onto the necks of primates to test anti-rejection drugs. She told medical journalists Jenny Bryan and John Clare that the primates used in xenotransplantation research will be subjected to a large number of traumatic procedures such as major surgery; internal haemorrhages; isolation in small cages; repeated blood sampling; wound infections; nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea because of immunosuppressant drugs; kidney or heart failure; and eventually death. She said: "It's not just the suffering they endure in the laboratories and research establishments. Just getting there can be torture. Studies of primates show them to have complex mental abilities which may increase their capacity to suffer. Supplying the laboratories in the UK imposes huge suffering on the animals. It involves capturing wild individuals, usually in Africa. They're then contained in small, single cages, and transported for very long distances causing deaths, distress and suffering."

Next of Kin

Langley's report, Next of Kin (2006), argues that monkeys suffer the same kind of pain, anxiety and anticipation as human beings would if placed in the same situations. David Morton, professor of Biomedical Science & Ethics at the University of Birmingham, called the report a "wake-up call to some scientists to raise their game in their justification and ways they use non-human primates in research."

Langley told New Scientist: "It’s not that they are so much like us they shouldn’t be experimented on. It comes down to pain and suffering. Like humans, they know the pain is coming, they remember pain and are susceptible to non-physical pain, suffering anxiety if they’re isolated socially from other monkeys." Langley says that there is "no halfway house": "We can argue about the science forever, but what I’ve never heard is any clear scientific explanation for moral discrimination." Her report cites studies suggesting that humans and great apes — currently not used in experiments in the UK — as well as macaques and other monkeys are more conscious of themselves and others than was previously believed, giving them an equivalent moral status.

Publications

• Next of Kin: A Report on the Use of Primates in Experiments Template:PDFlink, British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and European Coalition to End Animal Experiments (ECEAE), 2006.
• Vegan Nutrition. The Vegan Society, 1995. ISBN 090733718X
• Animal Experimentation: The Consensus Changes. MacMillan, 1989. ISBN 041202411X
• "Plea for a Sensitive Science" in Animal Experimentation: The Consensus Changes. MacMillan, 1989
• "Acute Toxicity Testing Without Animals" Template:PDFlink, ECEAE, 2005.
• "Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - A Non-animal Testing Approach" Template:PDFlink, Green Party, 2004.
• "Chemical Safety & Animal Testing: A Regulatory Smokescreen?" Template:PDFlink, ECEAE, 2004.
• "The Way Forward: Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy," Part 1 Template:PDFlink, Part 2 Template:Pdflink, ECEAE, 2004.

Notes

1. ^ Langley, Gill. "Next of Kin: A Report on the Use of Primates in Experiments" Template:PDFlink, British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, June 2006.
2. ^ Bryan, Jenny & Clare, John. Organ Farms. Carlton, 2001. excerpt
3. "Examination of Witnesses (Questions 382-399)", Select Committee on Animals In Scientific Procedures, United Kingdom Parliament, retrieved July 15, 2006.
4. Asthana, Anushka. "Pro-Test in support of animal experiments", The Observer, April 30, 2006.
5. Alistair Currie's speech to the Oxford Union, BUAV, retrieved July 15, 2006.
6. Burch, Druin. "The sceptic", The Guardian, March 2, 2006.
7. "Reduce animal testing, Lords urge", BBC News, July 24, 2002.
8. Nature 417, 684−687; 2002.
9. "Paul Homles, MP for Chesterfield, to chair debate on primate testing", Politics.co.uk, May 31, 2006.
10. ^ Coghlan, Andy. "Report claims experiments on monkeys are vital", New Scientist, June 2, 2006.

References

• Asthana, Anushka. "Pro-Test in support of animal experiments", The Observer, April 30, 2006.
• Bryan, Jenny & Clare, John. Organ Farms. Carlton, 2001.
• Burch, Druin. "The sceptic", The Guardian, March 2, 2006.
• Coghlan, Andy. "Report claims experiments on monkeys are vital", New Scientist, June 2, 2006.
• Langley, Gill. "Next of Kin: A Report on the Use of Primates in Experiments" Template:PDFlink, British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, June 2006.
• Alistair Currie's speech to the Oxford Union, British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, retrieved July 15, 2006.
• "Examination of Witnesses (Questions 382-399)", Select Committee on Animals In Scientific Procedures, United Kingdom Parliament, retrieved July 15, 2006.
• "Paul Homles, MP for Chesterfield, to chair debate on primate testing", Politics.co.uk, May 31, 2006.

• Animal liberation movement