Revision as of 03:29, 8 January 2015 editMaxxx12345 (talk | contribs)153 edits →Expert attention← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:30, 8 January 2015 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Maxxx12345 - "→Expert attention: "Next edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Is it possible to get another philosopher to address inconsistencies in a section? https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Gender#Gender_identity There seems to be a problem with some posters and/or editors, seemingly, trying to advocate, albeit inconsistently, regarding choice in self identifying gender. There are a few examples, such as quoting Butler's stance that there is a limited choice while denying there is a choice. Another being that there is a choice, but only for certain individuals (clearly a position of advocacy and not one of explaining the subject matter to readers). | Is it possible to get another philosopher to address inconsistencies in a section? https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Gender#Gender_identity There seems to be a problem with some posters and/or editors, seemingly, trying to advocate, albeit inconsistently, regarding choice in self identifying gender. There are a few examples, such as quoting Butler's stance that there is a limited choice while denying there is a choice. Another being that there is a choice, but only for certain individuals (clearly a position of advocacy and not one of explaining the subject matter to readers). <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
== ] == | == ] == |
Revision as of 03:30, 8 January 2015
|
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/WikiProject used
Category:Dispositional beliefs
This category has been nominated for deletion. Please see Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_November_9#Category:Dispositional_beliefs. – Fayenatic London 07:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been featured
Hello, |
Category:Postmodern terminology
This category is to be deleted shortly. Please would members of this project review the current members in case any should be moved into a sibling category such as Category:Postmodern theory? – Fayenatic London 06:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
David Hume GA review - second opinion
A second opinion has been requested for the GA review of David Hume. I am the nominator, and the reviewer and myself are at loggerheads about three outstanding criticisms. The details are on the talk pages for the article. Any help would be appreciated. Myrvin (talk) 13:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Expert attention
This is a notice about Category:Philosophy/Epistemology articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
This is a notice about Category:Philosophy/Logic articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
This is a notice about Category:Philosophy/Philosophers articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
This is a notice about Category:Philosophy/Social and political philosophy articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 18:47, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Is it possible to get another philosopher to address inconsistencies in a section? https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Gender#Gender_identity There seems to be a problem with some posters and/or editors, seemingly, trying to advocate, albeit inconsistently, regarding choice in self identifying gender. There are a few examples, such as quoting Butler's stance that there is a limited choice while denying there is a choice. Another being that there is a choice, but only for certain individuals (clearly a position of advocacy and not one of explaining the subject matter to readers). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxxx12345 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Begging the question
I have nominated the above named article as needing expert attention and request some of the members may take a look at it. Thanks.OrangesRyellow (talk) 09:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Category: