Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:47, 9 January 2015

/Archive1/Archive2/Archive3

Block log

I'm not actually reading all the thread so I'm not clear on the issues, but I noticed that you thought GregKaye's block log is clear - but you were write, Callanec did block him. Dougweller (talk) 09:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Got it, thanks, Dougweller. I apologize, I was trying to be doubly careful I wasn't reading into another editors edits or insinuating something that was untrue. It appears I spelled his name incorrectly checking the block log, though, and you're (or I guess I'm) right . Thanks for the clarification. DOCUMENT★ERROR 10:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem, glad you were being careful. Dougweller (talk) 11:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

User:DocumentError I know that it was perfectly in your right to redact and add the above information back into the thread. I would have been happy either way. The specific edits, within I think controversial contexts, that led to the bans were made in good faith but a ban is a ban. I know that tactical argument might have left you to push the case and I respect that you didn't. I hope also that you realise that my only involvement in this was to try to keep the peace in general around ISIL related topics. There has been, from my perspective, a lot of PA, arguing against editors and not for the point, stating opinion as facts, indcrit and things like that on the page. Anything that can be done to ease this situation will be appreciated. If you have any issues with any specific editors then please be specific with cited or clearly referenced comment. I would support any valid case that any editor makes here that helps a move to increasingly civil interaction and contribution on various talk pages. Please be assured that there was nothing personal in my comments. GregKaye 13:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of Arms of the Washington Code Reviser.png

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of Arms of the Washington Code Reviser.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

DocumentError:

Regarding Siren's Rune I see that it has indeed been removed. I thought that simply stating information about the book was encyclopedic. A person would first have to type in the book's title into Misplaced Pages, to get more information. In other words, they would need to actively input the query. Please elaborate as to why this was promotional.

Thank you. Cory B. aka Klaatu302---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klaatu302 (talk • contribs) 07:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Iranian intervention in Iraq (2014–present)

The article Iranian intervention in Iraq (2014–present) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

an unusual search string with nothing linking to it

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 07:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

2014 Iranian-led intervention against ISIS listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2014 Iranian-led intervention against ISIS. Since you had some involvement with the 2014 Iranian-led intervention against ISIS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)