Revision as of 01:07, 10 January 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,657 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Sitush/Archive 21) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:46, 10 January 2015 edit undoSmallbones (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers59,646 edits →Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
:Will do. I am up to my eyeballs with another problematic article right now but I am aware of the goings-on at ]. I know that it is on the watchlists of a fair few sensible people but if they do not pick up on it then I will certainly delve a bit further. - ] (]) 00:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | :Will do. I am up to my eyeballs with another problematic article right now but I am aware of the goings-on at ]. I know that it is on the watchlists of a fair few sensible people but if they do not pick up on it then I will certainly delve a bit further. - ] (]) 00:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Please see ] == | |||
Please see ]. ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 02:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:46, 10 January 2015
It's time to make a stand against the arrogant and incompetent Wikimedia Foundation and its complete disregard for those of us who actually build this encyclopedia. Their salaries are paid on the back of our unpaid work, therefore in line with some others I've decided to withdraw my labour every Monday until things change. And if they don't, I'll be extending the length of my strike. I encourage everyone to join me. |
An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be arsed to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
List of Nadars
Thank you for the explanation in my talk page, with all due respect sir, all the other names in that pages have no reference at all, at least I point a article where the subject's father caste, that is same as his own. No problem, I am a newbie to the wikipedia, thanks for pointing to the right direction. :) Regards,
Dabbing of Suryanvanshi
Hello, Sitush. You have new messages at !dea4u's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Can You please look at this topics in Wiki
Seems these Wiki Articles are biased and based on bogus report defaming hindu religion. If you can look at these pages and remove outdated data, I'll be very thankful to you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/Abhinav_Bharat#cite_note-20 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.59.4.160 (talk) 00:43, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- I am not very familiar with the group in question. If you are not getting any responses at the article talk page then it might be best if you post a neutral message at WT:INB asking people if they would review the article. - Sitush (talk) 11:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
regarding arvind kejriwal
news are the source for wiki .Doesn't it is good practice to include controversies supported by references in wikipedia articles ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krazylearner (talk • contribs) 11:00 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- It can be a bit awkward when it comes to biographies of living people. I think you are probably referring to the claims that he plagiarised an earlier book. I vaguely recall that legal action was taken but I've got no idea of the outcome. - Sitush (talk) 11:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Kerala page
I see that you deleted the entire section about the labourers. Can you be convinced to keep the information and delete the numbers. The info is true, just needs a source, the numbers can be added later. Also please respond to the discussion on citation needed. Thank you for your effort.FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 14:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- No source, no mention. Articles about religious matters are fickle things and we really do need to keep on top of them. - Sitush (talk) 14:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning Bhagat Singh, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Happy New Year Sitush!
Happy New Year!Sitush,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Hafspajen (talk) 10:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Raja Umair
Sitush Satti Rajput is an important tribe of Potohar, Thanks. :)
ANI
Thanks for looking out for me on ANI. Good job I didn't miss it, though — a kind user alerted me — perhaps I'll put it at the top of my page for a while. I'm not as used to these accolades as you are, I still enjoy them. Bishonen | talk 00:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC).
- Oh, I quite enjoy them from time to time. If I thanked everyone who looked after me, I'd get nothing more done. - Sitush (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Hindi speaker needed
I have a feeling Saimkhan994 doesn't really know English because of the message left on my talk page. I've reverted their edits on Rampur, Uttar Pradesh a few times and they are currently working on Draft:Ustad Sohrab Khan. I'm assuming they know Hindi because it sounds like they are from Rampur. Bgwhite (talk) 10:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hindi is beyond me, Bgwhite. I'm fluent in English and gibberish only. I think you'd be best asking at WT:INB. - Sitush (talk) 11:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Sensible little user
Do you know this user, little Sitush? On face of it, appears very well informed! Fount of good sense! bishzilla ROARR!! 10:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC).
- IAC sock/meat/block evasion (take your pick). See their contributions on 31 Dec etc in a Commons deletion discussion. - Sitush (talk) 11:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Cheema article
One person on the Cheema article seems to keep wanting stick with his version, he has reverted my edit as he says he has some issue with you, please check my sources and revert back if you feel they are acceptable. Rowland938 (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not reverting back because your version makes no sense. I will, however, take another look at the sources and see if adjustments are needed. - Sitush (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Left a note at Talk:Cheema. - Sitush (talk) 17:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sitush
Can you see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kahloon clan, it is not an important issue that whether it is Kahlon or Kahloon, it is just not notable enough for having its own page. Also see the new changes of Nai (caste), might be important although I haven't searched around. Johnmylove is now blocked indefinitely.- Oh and Happy New Year! Bladesmulti (talk) 05:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- A block for that user was inevitable. As per your link, they were not exactly one of my fans, were they? I've scrubbed the Nai stuff (they're on my list of things to watch out for while reading up on castes) and will take a look at Kahlon/Kahloon. My best wishes to you, also. - Sitush (talk) 10:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
- Hey, this is in relation to the whole Raheja Developers stuff. It's still sort of ongoing. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- I've just noticed :( I'd be surprised if the SPI doesn't turn up something. - Sitush (talk) 09:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Article Jat people
Dear, I request you to please have a watch on recent edit activities on the article Jat people. Its being made a mess. Thanks and regards.--Mahi 17:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will do. I am up to my eyeballs with another problematic article right now but I am aware of the goings-on at Jat people. I know that it is on the watchlists of a fair few sensible people but if they do not pick up on it then I will certainly delve a bit further. - Sitush (talk) 00:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Smallbones(smalltalk) 02:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)