Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sculpture of Ancient Greece: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:54, 17 July 2006 editMDP23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,211 edits Redirect to Greek Statue: spelling← Previous edit Revision as of 12:21, 17 July 2006 edit undoSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits Redirect to Greek StatueNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:


* I agree with the above - statues fall under the umbrella of sculpture, so statues should be merged '''into''' sculptures. Also "Greek stature" sounds like one item, similar to "Cleopatra's Needle" or something, so may couse confusion if the whole of Greek Sculpture falls under this title. ] 09:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC) * I agree with the above - statues fall under the umbrella of sculpture, so statues should be merged '''into''' sculptures. Also "Greek stature" sounds like one item, similar to "Cleopatra's Needle" or something, so may couse confusion if the whole of Greek Sculpture falls under this title. ] 09:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

* Evidently there has been some confusion. The redirect was created as part of the of merging. This article has been . The merge was proposed more than a year ago and there was no dispute. The above user Nscheffey has incorrectly reverted a redirect to its former file. In itself, this is a POV fork for whatever reason that user has. Looking at the history of the file you will notice of the proposal was July of 2005. You can also see that of the corresponding file is 7 July 2005. The user Nscheffey had made on of these files up until after the files were already merged. The user Nscheffey, though, has been as a and has again acted in bad faith to disrupt the normal flow of work on Misplaced Pages. He has made a false claim on the page claiming that there was a dispute here about a merge that "should" occur rather than a merge that has already occurred. I performed this merge as a part of , and handled perhaps merge proposals on the 14 of July. Looking at you will note that this file was the sixth oldest merge proposal on all of WP. Because of his recent harassment and stalking, I was informed three different admins to ignore him and not to "feed the trolls". His first revert on the redirect that was put on this file as a standard procedure in merging was done without any discussion on his part. He had also failed to handle any of the which his revert had caused. Being told to ignore him, and without any discussion on his part, I reverted the problem that he had caused by reverting the redirect. Hope this helps. ] 12:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:21, 17 July 2006

If there are so few greek sculptures today might it be possible to list them all here with images...

however...

there is far more to greek sculpture than just the statues, so it would be misleading. sculptures such as the stele or the friezes shouldn't really be put under statues, although they frequently are.

Redirect to Greek Statue

  • Since statues represent one aspect of Sculpture of Ancient Greece (as noted above) I think it's clear that Greek statue should be merged into Scuplture, and not vice versa. Plus "Sculpture of Ancient Greece" sounds a lot more encyclopedic than "Greek statue". --Nscheffey 20:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with the above - statues fall under the umbrella of sculpture, so statues should be merged into sculptures. Also "Greek stature" sounds like one item, similar to "Cleopatra's Needle" or something, so may couse confusion if the whole of Greek Sculpture falls under this title. Martinp23 09:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Evidently there has been some confusion. The redirect was created as part of the standard process of merging. This article has already been merged. The merge was proposed more than a year ago and there was no dispute. The above user Nscheffey has incorrectly reverted a redirect to its former file. In itself, this is a POV fork for whatever reason that user has. Looking at the history of the file you will notice that the date of the proposal was July of 2005. You can also see that the date of the corresponding file is 7 July 2005. The user Nscheffey had made no comment on either of these files up until after the files were already merged. The user Nscheffey, though, has been stalking me as a personal vendetta and has again acted in bad faith to disrupt the normal flow of work on Misplaced Pages. He has made a false claim on the WP:3O page claiming that there was a dispute here about a merge that "should" occur rather than a merge that has already occurred. I performed this merge as a part of cleanup on old merge requests, and handled perhaps 40 to 50 different merge proposals on the 14 of July. Looking at that list you will note that this file was the sixth oldest merge proposal on all of WP. Because of his recent harassment and stalking, I was informed three different admins to ignore him and not to "feed the trolls". His first revert on the redirect that was put on this file as a standard procedure in merging was done without any discussion on his part. He had also failed to handle any of the double redirects which his revert had caused. Being told to ignore him, and without any discussion on his part, I reverted the problem that he had caused by reverting the redirect. Hope this helps. Ste4k 12:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)