Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:39, 17 July 2006

Grendelkhan

Discuss here (26/0/0) Ending 15:12, 2006-07-23 (UTC)

Grendelkhan (talk · contribs) – Grendelkhan has been editing here for nearly three years and has over seven-thousand substantive edits spread throughout various namespaces. He has undertaken numerous janitorial tasks, and has been particularly active in uploading and sourcing images for the project. In short, this user has given every indication that he will properly use the admin tools, and his promotion will be a benefit to the project. bd2412 T 16:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. Thanks! grendel|khan 01:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Support

1. Support It is a great honour for me to be able to be the first supporter of this excellent user. I am not sure how you are not an admin already!!! Abcdefghijklm 15:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
2. Support. I understand Joturner's objections in regard to few edits within the last 3 months. This is certainly a concern. I think, however, that this is far outweighed by the depth of this editor's contributions to Misplaced Pages, particularly in work related to administrative tools. He has an incredibly cool featured picture (dare I say, one of the best I've ever seen), spectacular use of edit summaries, and has been around here for time enough to have a cool perspective. It's my honor and pleasure to support him. Alphachimp 15:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
3. Support Naconkantari 19:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
4. Support, don't see why not. Stifle (talk) 16:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
5. Support. Why should we punish people for not being active all the time who are clearly qualified and trustworthy to handle the tools nicely? People have lives outside of Misplaced Pages and just because someone may not be active all the time does not mean that they are not worthy of the tools. It just means that his helpful janitorial edits may be a bit fewer than other administrators if he isn't active all the time, but a little sysop help is much more beneficial than no sysop help. Cowman109 16:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
6. Support I can't oppose because of a drop in edit frequency. I feel that there is enough information to establish a perspective, and evidence to support considerable administrative usage, especially since you are not a burned out user. I actually like that you are going for adminship with a refreshed attitude. Besides, administrators only hurt the community when they abuse their tools or, as a group, do not perform the janitorial duties. — Deckiller 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
7. Support per nom - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
8. Relaxed, late-breaking nominator support. bd2412 T 18:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
9. Support This Fire Burns Always 18:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
10. Support --Guinnog 18:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
11. Merovingian (T, C, @) 18:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
12. Support. Cliche! 1ne 19:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
13. Support Very good editor.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  19:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
14. digital_me 20:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
15. Support per nom. RandyWang (/_rants) 21:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
16. Support per all above. Roy A.A. 22:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
17. Support Any ulterior motives must be gone by now! :) Nookdog 22:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
18. Support. The apparently scanty interaction with other users due to few edits to article/user/project talk spaces is a minor concern; but the great experience he shows in other areas, combined with the long time he's consistently invested in the project easily compensates for this. Phædriel ♥ tell me - 22:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
19. Support. DarthVader 22:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
20. Support per above abakharev 01:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
21. Support meets my criteria —Mets501 (talk) 03:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
22. Support Edits show a fair and even handed approached. Would make an excellent admin. Agne27 04:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
23. Support long term and quality editor - Peripitus (Talk) 04:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
24. Support. --Klemen Kocjancic 07:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
25. Support The fact that you do have a life outside Misplaced Pages makes me support you even MORE! TruthCrusader 07:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
26. Support.--Kungfu Adam 12:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
27. Support --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 13:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Mild Oppose Awaiting answer to question per one of my standards (v) Your involvement has been minimal over the past several months. Two hundred edits ago for you was December 2005 and four hundred edits ago was August 2005. You may have had a use for the tools in the past, but you don't seem to have one now. -- joturner 15:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Unless there is some special circumstance (Grendel, you don't have to go into great detail if you don't want to), I don't see how "lives outside of Misplaced Pages" can fit in here. But a year of what I see as inactivity needs some explanation. -- joturner 17:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

While I do think that an explanation is in order, I think that this is a bit of an overreaction. People really do have lives outside of Misplaced Pages, and I think that administrators with them are significantly more balanced. Alphachimp 18:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm troubled by opposition based on a low level of recent activity - there's no question that this editor has been here for years, has thousands of edits, and (despite reduced levels of activity in recent months) has consistently continued to contribute to the project. I don't see how giving Grendelkahn admin powers would do anything but benefit Misplaced Pages. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I'll strike out my vote, and wait for the answer. I wasn't trying to say that admins shouldn't have lives (of course not). What I was saying was that that could easily explain several weeks or a couple months of inactivity. But this is a year. Certainly there are explanations for a year of inactivity, but I would hardly consider it explanable by simply "people have lives". Anyway, I'll await Grendelkhan's answer. -- joturner 18:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

All user's edits.Voice-of-All 00:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

--Viewing contribution data for user Grendelkhan (over the 5000 edit(s) shown on this page)--  (FAQ)
Time range: 621 approximate day(s) of edits on this page
Most recent edit on: 0hr (UTC) -- 17, Jul, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 18hr (UTC) -- 4, October, 2004
Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major edits: 97.97% Minor edits: 99.83%
Average edits per day: 1.55 (for last 500 edit(s))
Article edit summary use (last 711 edits): Major article edits: 98.8% Minor article edits: 99.82%
Analysis of edits (out of all 5000 edits shown of this page):
Notable article edits (creation/expansion/rewrites/sourcing): 0.14% (7)
Significant article edits (small content/info/reference additions): 7.26% (363)
Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 46.36% (2318)
Superficial article edits marked as minor: 86.48%
Breakdown of all edits:
Unique pages edited: 4013 | Average edits per page: 1.25 | Edits on top: 15.44%
Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 26.1% (1305 edit(s))
Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 68.72% (3436 edit(s))
Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 4.7% (235 edit(s))
Unmarked edits: 0.36% (18 edit(s))
Edits by Misplaced Pages namespace:
Article: 57.84% (2892) | Article talk: 3.78% (189)
User: 1.68% (84) | User talk: 1.96% (98)
Misplaced Pages: 9.22% (461) | Misplaced Pages talk: 1.1% (55)
Image: 22.4% (1120)
Template: 1.32% (66)
Category: 0.26% (13)
Portal: 0% (0)
Help: 0% (0)
MediaWiki: 0% (0)
Other talk pages: 0.44% (22)

• See Grendelkhan's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.

As this seems to be standard practice, here are my stats:

Total edits	7770
Distinct pages edited	5851
Average edits/page	1.328
First edit	15:07, 31 July 2003
(main)	4819
Talk	241
User	199
User talk	161
Image	1285
Image talk	5
Template	110
Template talk	17
Category	102
Category talk	9
Misplaced Pages	749
Misplaced Pages talk	73

Edit summary usage is 99% for major edits, 100% for minor edits.

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Misplaced Pages backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I've spent a good amount of time on images and media for deletion in the past; I feel I could be of use keeping it up to date. I've spent some time on RC patrol in the past, which I'd be quite willing to do more of, especially with the added ease of the "rollback" option. In general, my administrative attentions would be directed toward obstructed page-moves, and the performance of any minor tasks which require administrative access.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: I'm most proud of my image contributions, especially the collar picture, which I've seen floating around the internet as a Livejournal usericon or basis for an "LJSecret" postcard, and this Maurycy Gottlieb painting. I'm also pleased with some of the small, nitpicky work I've done, like cross-linking works to the Internet Speculative Fiction Database and the Project Gutenberg catalog.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I generally try to avoid controversial topics; I think my time is better spent including noncontroversial information---of which there's certainly plenty to be done. I strongly believe that personal attacks have no place here, but that's generally not an issue in the types of editing I've done. I'm confident that I can fairly enforce policy if and when the need arises.

Optional question from Cowman109 I noticed you don't have your e-mail activated. Having an active e-mail accessible through Misplaced Pages is important should people need to contact you through private means, or if people aren't able to contact you through Misplaced Pages at all (I.E. a blocked user). So, would you activate your e-mail, please? :)

A: That's a good idea. Done! grendel|khan 16:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Question from Joturner: Why have you been largely inactive over the past year? Have there been other ways in which you have been contributing to Misplaced Pages over the past year that cannot be seen in your contribution history?

A:

Optional question from Lar:

(one big long question about categories of admins and your thoughts about them) Are you aware of Category:Administrators_open_to_recall? What do you think of it? Would you consider placing yourself (placement should only be done by oneself) in this category if you were made an admin? Why or why not? Are you aware of Category:Rouge admins? What do you think of it? Would you consider allowing yourself to by placed in this category (placement is traditionally done by someone else) if you were made an admin? Why or why not? (note: both these categories have some controversy attached to them, for different reasons, and note also, although I am a policy and process wonk I am in both categories, and finally, note that there is no wrong answer here...) ++Lar: t/c 15:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)