Misplaced Pages

User talk:MDP23: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:34, 17 July 2006 editMDP23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,211 edits add stuff and move toc← Previous edit Revision as of 20:43, 17 July 2006 edit undoSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits Perhaps you were hasty...Next edit →
Line 59: Line 59:


please see: ]. Thanks. ] 12:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC) please see: ]. Thanks. ] 12:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

== Perhaps you were hasty... ==

::::Well done for getting used to wikipedia so quickly. I was referring to the edits I did in the context of the article (to be honest I didn't want to research too much by going through your talk page history), but I think your comment above does underline the fact that third opinion was the only real way forward. As of just now, I've merged the pages in the direction of the consensus, so I hope this is OK. Thanks ] 20:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::Good job on the re-merge. It might be helpful to explain the significant difference between the work you have just performed and how it differs from the incomplete efforts regarding connectivity and orphaning of articles to Nscheffey. I have doubts that he has a complete understanding of my half of the disagreement you have just resolved. Thanks. ] 20:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::*My apologies. It appears that I spoke to soon. Your efforts have deleted major portions of the . This was probably unintentional, but it does underscore the reasons that I had mentioned earlier in discussion regarding a split and POV fork. ] 20:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:43, 17 July 2006

Contact me

Please leave a message on my talk page or you can contact me on this email address. Please tell me if I have incorrectly reverted an edit of yours and I can put it in my vandalism log.

Welcome

Hello, MDP23, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!Kukini 15:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC)


Dave the Chameleon

For what it's worth, I think the Dave the Chameleon article was worth doing, and it looks like you tried to make it unbiased and neutral. I don't know if it'll get deleted or not, but you have my support. I think the chameleon jokes are now probably going to be around for about as long as Cameron is, so I reckon it deserves its own article. All the best. KrJDub05 15:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

{{help me}}

How may I help? Brian | (Talk) 19:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Hi - I looked at AfD, and saw lots of articles about Jewish Summer Camps - and though of brigning them together into articles, state by state like Jewish Summer Camps in Maine. I just copy and pasted from the previous articles for that one. Is it alright to do this, or is there a specific procedure, and is it worth continuing with other states?

thanks Martinp23 19:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Golden-crowned Warbler

Hi! The image you uploaded from the commons to this page was of a golden crowned sparrow, not warbler, that was uploaded with the wrong name. Please see that article's talk page for more info! Sabine's Sunbird talk 17:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry - ive asked for the page to be deleted from commons to avoid the confusion I suffered! Martinp23 18:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

List of Czech Jews

Hello, you mistakenly attributed "vandalism" to the recent revert on List of Czech Jews so I have reverted back your revert. Thank you for watching out for vandals but be more careful next time. 72.144.71.124

I think you were quite right. Keep it up.--20.138.246.89 15:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Hinduization of Sikhs

Hi - please don't remove the tags I've inserted. This article has issues that the editors and community needs to resolve. This Fire Burns Always 14:23, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Concerning Euphoria (music project) and CSD

I wonder if You have read the CSD guidances on reporting unremarkable people or groups/vanity pages to speedy deletion, please study Misplaced Pages:Notability (music) to confirm with the policy on speedily deleting musical group articles. feydey 23:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome message placement

Hi! Thanks for welcoming so many new users! I just wanted to let you know that it's customary to place welcome messages on new users' talk pages, not on their user pages. Just something to be aware of. Thanks! —Caesura 18:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Martinp23! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael / 19:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 19:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem - it's nice to receive a thankyou once in a while. —Xyrael / 20:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I PLEAD NOT GUILTY!

Dear sir, I did not vandalize. That page was created by my friend and he asked me to fill in more information because I am an expert on fagatrons. Let me put it this way so you understand. Grafiti is vandalism. But if a friend asked you to help him paint his house, it is not vandalism. Thank you.

response to your vote on a merge

please see: Talk:Sculpture_of_Ancient_Greece#Redirect_to_Greek_Statue. Thanks. Ste4k 12:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps you were hasty...

Well done for getting used to wikipedia so quickly. I was referring to the edits I did in the context of the article (to be honest I didn't want to research too much by going through your talk page history), but I think your comment above does underline the fact that third opinion was the only real way forward. As of just now, I've merged the pages in the direction of the consensus, so I hope this is OK. Thanks Martinp23 20:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Good job on the re-merge. It might be helpful to explain the significant difference between the work you have just performed and how it differs from the incomplete efforts regarding connectivity and orphaning of articles to Nscheffey. I have doubts that he has a complete understanding of my half of the disagreement you have just resolved. Thanks. Ste4k 20:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • My apologies. It appears that I spoke to soon. Your efforts have deleted major portions of the other article. This was probably unintentional, but it does underscore the reasons that I had mentioned earlier in discussion regarding a split and POV fork. Ste4k 20:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)