Misplaced Pages

April Uprising of 1876: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:16, 20 June 2013 editRussian editor1996 (talk | contribs)55 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 07:27, 23 January 2015 edit undoZoupan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,156 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
(27 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{for|the John Butler Trio's fifth studio album|April Uprising (album)}}
{{Infobox Military Conflict|
{{more footnotes|date=April 2011}}
{{Infobox military conflict|
conflict=April Uprising conflict=April Uprising
|colour_scheme=background:#eeddbb |colour_scheme=background:#eeddbb
|image= ] |image= ]
|caption= Regions involved in the Stara Zagora and April revolts. The borders of the Bulgarian Principality, according to the Constantinople Conference of 1876, are indicated. |caption= Regions involved in the Stara Zagora and April revolts. The borders of the Bulgarian Principality, according to the Constantinople Conference of 1876, are indicated.
|partof=the ] |partof=]
|date=April 20 - middle of May, 1878 |date=April 20 - middle of May, 1876
|place=] |place=]
|result=Rebellion suppressed; Defeat of the Uprising led to the ] |result=Rebellion suppressed; Defeat of the Uprising led to the ]
|combatant1=] Revolutionaries |combatant1=] Revolutionaries
|combatant2={{flag|Ottoman Empire}} |combatant2={{flag|Ottoman Empire}}
|commander1=] ]<br /> ] ] {{KIA}} <br /> ] ] <br /> ] ] {{KIA}} |commander1=] ]<br /> ] ] {{KIA}} <br /> ] ] <br /> ] ] {{KIA}}
|commander2=]<br>]<br>]
|commander2=
|strength1= around 10,000 men |strength1= around 10,000 men
|strength2= around 100,000 men |strength2= around 100,000 men
Line 18: Line 20:
|}} |}}
{{Campaignbox Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878)}} {{Campaignbox Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878)}}
{{for|]'s fifth studio album, see ]}}
{{more footnotes|date=April 2011}}


{{Campaignbox Bulgarian-Ottoman Wars}} {{Campaignbox Bulgarian-Ottoman Wars}}

The '''April Uprising''' ({{lang-bg|Априлско въстание}}, ''Aprilsko vastanie'') was an insurrection organised by the ] in the ] from April to May 1876, which indirectly resulted in the re-establishment of Bulgaria in 1878.<ref>{{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Bulgaria/History}}</ref> Тhe regular Ottoman Army and irregular ] units brutally suppressed the rebels, leading to a public outcry in Europe and the United States, with many famous intellectuals condemning the Ottoman atrocities and supporting the oppressed Bulgarian population. The '''April Uprising''' ({{lang-bg|Априлско въстание}}, ''Aprilsko vastanie'') was an insurrection organised by the ] in the ] from April to May 1876, which indirectly resulted in the re-establishment of Bulgaria in 1878.<ref>{{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Bulgaria/History}}</ref> Тhe regular Ottoman Army and irregular ] units brutally suppressed the rebels, leading to a public outcry in Europe and the United States, with many famous intellectuals condemning the Ottoman atrocities and supporting the oppressed Bulgarian population.


The 1876 uprising involved only those parts of the Ottoman territories populated predominantly by Bulgarians. The emergence of Bulgarian national sentiments was closely related to the re-establishment of the independent ] in 1870. Together with notions of romantic nationalism the rise of national awareness became known as the ]. The 1876 uprising involved only those parts of the Ottoman territories populated predominantly by Bulgarians. The emergence of Bulgarian national sentiments was closely related to the re-establishment of the independent ] in 1870. Together with notions of romantic nationalism the rise of national awareness became known as the ].


==Background== ==Background==
In Europe, in the eighteenth century, the classic non-national states were the ''multi-ethnic empires'' such as the ], ruled by a ] and the population belonged to many ethnic groups, which spoke many languages. The idea of ] was an increasing emphasis during the 19th century, on the ] and ] origins of the nations. The most noticeable characteristic was the degree to which nation states use the state as an instrument of ''national unity'', in economic, social and cultural life. By the 19th century, the Ottomans had fallen well behind the rest of Europe in science, technology, and industry. However, the Bulgarian population was also suppressed socially and politically under ] rule. Additionally, more immediate causes for the greater mobilisation compared to earlier revolts were the severe internal and external problems which the Ottoman Empire experienced in the middle of the 1870s. In 1875, taxes levied on non-Muslims were raised for fear of a ], which, in turn, caused additional tension between ] and ] and facilitated the breakout of the ] and the Stara Zagora revolt in Bulgaria. The failure of the Ottomans to handle the Herzegovinian uprising successfully showed the weakness of the Ottoman state while the brutalities which ensued, discredited additionally the empire to the outside world. In the late 19th century European ideas of ] were adopted by the Bulgarian elite. In Europe, in the eighteenth century, the classic non-national states were the ''multi-ethnic empires'' such as the ], ruled by a ] and the population belonged to many ethnic groups, which spoke many languages. The idea of ] was an increasing emphasis during the 19th century, on the ] and ] origins of the nations. The most noticeable characteristic was the degree to which nation states use the state as an instrument of ''national unity'', in economic, social and cultural life. By the 18th century, the Ottomans had fallen well behind the rest of Europe in science, technology, and industry. However, the Bulgarian population was also suppressed socially and politically under ] rule. Additionally, more immediate causes for the greater mobilisation compared to earlier revolts were the severe internal and external problems which the Ottoman Empire experienced in the middle of the 1870s. In 1875, taxes levied on non-Muslims were raised for fear of a ], which, in turn, caused additional tension between ] and ] and facilitated the breakout of the ] and the Stara Zagora revolt in Bulgaria. The failure of the Ottomans to handle the Herzegovinian uprising successfully showed the weakness of the Ottoman state while the brutalities which ensued, discredited additionally the empire to the outside world. In the late 19th century European ideas of ] were adopted by the Bulgarian elite.


==Preparation== ==Preparation==
Line 40: Line 37:


==Outbreak and suppression== ==Outbreak and suppression==
] of an insurgent from ]]] <!-- Deleted image removed: ] of an insurgent from ]]] -->
In conformity with the decisions taken at ], the local rebel committee attacked on the 20th of April 1876 the headquarters of the Ottoman police in ] commanded by Necip Aga and after a firefight in which two Ottoman police officials were killed, Necip Aga was forced to release Bulgarians imprisoned in the police station and fled the town. <ref>История на Българите: Военна история на българите от древността до наши дни, 2007: pp.306</ref> and proclaimed the insurrection two weeks in advance. Within several days, the rebellion spread to the whole ] and to a number of towns and villages in the northwestern ]. The insurrection broke out in the other revolutionary districts, as well, though on a much smaller scale. The areas of ], ], and ] also revolted in force, as well as several villages north and south of ] and near ] (in the present-day ]). In conformity with the decisions taken at ], on the 20 April 1876 the local rebel committee attacked and surrounded the headquarters of the Ottoman police in ] commanded by Necip Aga. At least two Ottoman police officials were killed and Necip Aga was forced to release arrested Bulgarian rebel suspects. Necip Aga and his close officials managed to escaped the siege. However due to this incident the Bulgarian rebels had to proclaim the insurrection two weeks in advance of the planned date.<ref></ref> Within several days, the rebellion spread to the whole ] and to a number of towns and villages in the northwestern ]. The insurrection broke out in the other revolutionary districts, as well, though on a much smaller scale. The areas of ], ], and ] also revolted in force, as well as several villages north and south of ] and near ] (in the present-day ]).

] ]


The rebels attacked Muslim civilians as well as Ottoman officials and police. The number of civilians killed by the rebels is disputed. This violence is cited as provocation for the violence of Turkish forces against Bulgarian civilians during the suppression of the rebellion.
According to a contemporary report by Walter Baring, a secretary of the British Embassy to the Ottoman Empire,<ref>The diplomatic reminiscences of Lord Augustus Loftus. 1862-1879: Volume 2; 1894; </ref> the Muslim civilian population was not significantly affected,<ref>The Eastern question: from the treaty of Paris, 1856, to the treaty of Berlin, 1878, and to the second Afghan war; George Douglas Campbell Argyll; 2005, p.229</ref> and this was also substantiated by the reports of Eugene Schuyler and James F. Clarke, according to whom very few peaceful Muslims were killed.<ref>The legacy of Jihad: Islamic holy war and the fate of non-Muslim; Andrew G. Bostom; 2005, </ref> This has been accepted by modern historians, for example according to Richard Shannon less than 200 Muslims were killed, very few of them non-combatants.<ref>Gladstone and the Bulgarian agitation 1876; Richard Shannon; 1975; </ref> In fact, according to the report written by McGahan and Schuyler, even the Ottoman government did not claim more than 500 Muslims killed, most of them in battle.<ref>The Turkish atrocities in Bulgaria: Letters of the special commissioner of the "Daily news,"; Januarius Aloysius MacGahan, Eugene Schuyler; 1876; </ref>] is also know of being a close friend to the Russian general ], with whom he later covered the ] and the ]. MacGahan was also married to the daughter of a Russian noble family. MacGahan was already favoured in the Russian court after his coverage of the Siege of Khiva with the Russian Army.<ref>Todorova, Marii︠a︡ Nikolaeva,. "Imagining the Balkans", Oxford University Press, 1977, pp.106</ref><ref>By Federal Writers' Project, Writers' Program (Ohio), "The Ohio guide", The Ohio State Archeological and Historical Society, 1946, </ref> American historian Justin McCarthy, who is widely considered to have pro-Turkish views,<ref>Michael Mann, ”The dark side of democracy: explaining ethnic cleansing”, pp. 112-4, Cambridge, 2005 “… figures are derive from McCarthy (1995: I 91, 162-4, 339), who is often viewed as a scholar on the Turkish side of the debate.”</ref> claims that during the revolts over a 1,000 Muslims were slaughtered and many more expelled.<ref>McCarthy, Justin., "Death and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, 1821-1922" The Darwin Press Inc., Princeton, Sixth Printing 2008, pp.60</ref> According to Stanford Shaw, who is also considered pro-Turkish<ref>The Holocaust in Historical Context: The holocaust and mass death before the modern age; Steven T. Katz; 1994; </ref><ref>The Armenian massacres in Ottoman Turkey: a disputed genocide; Guenter Lewy; 2005; </ref> and whose wife was Turkish,<ref>Armenian Christians and Turkish Muslims: Atrocity, Denial and Identity; A. Christian van Gorder; 2004; </ref> in his behalf claims that many more Muslims were killed during the April Uprising than Christians.<ref>Shaw and Shaw: "History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, Nide 2" Cambridge University Press 1977, pp.162</ref> According to Barbara Jelavich the beginning of the April Uprising was accompanied by a massacre of Muslim civilians (without specifying casualties).<ref>Jelavich,. Barbara: "History of the Balkans: Eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Nide 1", Cambridge University Press 1999, pp.347</ref> Detachments of regular and ] Ottoman troops ('']s'') were mobilised and attacked the first insurgent towns as early as 25 April. ]s of civilian populations were committed, the principal places being ], ], ] and ].<ref>"Bulgaria" in the ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 11th Ed. (Cambridge, 1911.)</ref> By the middle of May, the insurrection was completely suppressed; one of the last sparks of resistance was poet ]'s attempt to come to the rebels' rescue with a detachment of Bulgarian political emigrees resident in Romania, ending with the unit's rout and Botev's death.

According to a contemporary report by Walter Baring, a secretary of the British Embassy to the Ottoman Empire, the Muslim civilian population was not significantly affected.<ref></ref><ref>George Douglas Campbell Argyll (2005) ''The Eastern Question: From the Treaty of Paris, 1856, to the Treaty of Berlin, 1878, and to the Second Afghan War'' p.229</ref> This was also substantiated by the reports of ] and James F. Clarke, according to whom very few peaceful Muslims were killed.<ref>Andrew G. Bostom (2005) ''The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims'' p.664</ref> This has been accepted by modern historians; for example, according to Richard Shannon less than 200 Muslims were killed, very few of them non-combatants.<ref>Richard Shannon (1975) ''Gladstone and the Bulgarian agitation 1876'' p.47</ref> In fact, according to the report written by Schuyler and American journalist ], even the Ottoman government did not claim more than 500 Muslims killed, most of them in battle.<ref>{{cite book|last=MacGahan|first= Januarius A.|title= Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the "Daily News", J.A. MacGahan, Esq. |publisher=Bradbury Agnew and Co. |location= London |year= 1876|chapter= |url=http://archive.org/details/MacGahanTurkishAtrocitiesInBulgaria |pages= 13 |accessdate=29 September 2013}}</ref> (MacGahan was a close friend of Russian general ], whom he accompanied while covering the ], including the ]; he was married to a Russian noblewoman. MacGahan was already favored in the Russian court after his coverage of the Siege of Khiva with the Russian Army.<ref>Todorova, Maria Nikolaeva. ''Imagining the Balkans'' Oxford University Press, 1977, pp.106</ref><ref>Federal Writers' Project, Writers' Program (Ohio), "The Ohio guide", The Ohio State Archeological and Historical Society, 1946, </ref>)

American historian Justin McCarthy, who is widely considered to have pro-Turkish views,<ref>Michael Mann (2005) ''The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing'', Cambridge University Press, pp. 112-4. “… figures are derive from McCarthy (1995: I 91, 162-4, 339), who is often viewed as a scholar on the Turkish side of the debate.”</ref> claims that during the revolts over 1,000 Muslims were slaughtered and many more expelled.<ref>McCarthy, Justin. ''Death and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, 1821-1922'' The Darwin Press Inc., Princeton, Sixth Printing 2008, pp.60</ref> Stanford Shaw, who is also considered pro-Turkish,<ref>Steven T. Katz (1994) ''The Holocaust in Historical Context: The Holocaust and Mass Death Before the Modern Age'' p.87</ref><ref></ref> and whose wife was Turkish,<ref></ref> claims that many more Muslims were killed during the April Uprising than Christians.<ref>Shaw and Shaw (1977) ''History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, Nide 2'' Cambridge University Press, pp.162</ref> According to Barbara Jelavich, the beginning of the April Uprising was accompanied by a massacre of Muslim civilians (without specifying casualties).<ref>Jelavich, Barbara (1999) ''History of the Balkans: Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, Nide 1'', Cambridge University Press, pp.347</ref>

The Ottoman response was immediate and severe. They mobilized detachments of regular troops and also ] '']s''. These forces attacked the first insurgent towns as early as 25 April. The Turkish forces massacred of civilian populations, the principal places being ], ], ], and ].<ref>"Bulgaria" in the ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 11th Ed. (Cambridge, 1911.)</ref> By the middle of May, the insurrection was completely suppressed; one of the last sparks of resistance was poet ]'s attempt to come to the rebels' rescue with a detachment of Bulgarian political émigrés resident in Romania, ending with the unit's rout and Botev's death.


The most detailed contemporaneous account was that of Schuyler. After visiting some of the sites, ] published a report detailing the atrocities. He reported that fifty-eight villages had been destroyed, five monasteries demolished, and fifteen thousand rebels killed.<ref name="Bulgaria 1876">The Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the Daily News, J.A. MacGahan Esq. With an Introduction and Mr. Schuyler's Preliminary Report (London, 1876.)</ref> The most detailed contemporaneous account was that of ]. After visiting some of the sites, Schuyler published a report detailing the atrocities. He reported that fifty-eight villages had been destroyed, five monasteries demolished, and fifteen thousand rebels killed.<ref>{{cite book|last=MacGahan|first= Januarius A.|title= Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the "Daily News," J.A. MacGahan, Esq. |publisher=Bradbury Agnew and Co. |location= London |year= 1876|chapter= Mr. Schuyler's Preliminary Report |url=http://archive.org/stream/MacGahanTurkishAtrocitiesInBulgaria/MacGahan_Turkish%20Atrocities%20in%20Bulgaria#page/n89/mode/2up |pages=89 |accessdate=30 September 2013}}</ref>
The American historian Richard Milliman states that ] visited personally only 11 of the villages he reported on. Schuyler, however certainly visited some Batak and many other of the destroyed towns and villages, including ]<ref>Selected essays; Eugene Schuyler, Evelyn Schuyler Schaeffer; 1901; </ref> and ].<ref>Bulgaria today: the land and the people, a voyage of discovery; "William Cary"; 1965; p.45</ref> Millman also claims that the accepted reality of the massacres is largely a myth.<ref>Millman, Richard. “The Bulgarian Massacres Reconsidered.” pp. 218,227-228</ref> Contemporary Bulgarian historians generally accept the number of Bulgarian casualties at the end of the uprising to be around 30 000.
The American historian Richard Milliman states that Schuyler visited personally only 11 of the villages he reported on. Schuyler, however certainly visited Batak and many other of the destroyed towns and villages, including ]
<ref></ref> and ].<ref>William Cary (1965) ''Bulgaria Today: the Land and the People, a Voyage of Discovery'' p.45</ref> Millman also claims that the accepted reality of the massacres is largely a myth.<ref>Millman, Richard. ''The Bulgarian Massacres Reconsidered'' pp. 218, 227-228</ref> Contemporary Bulgarian historians generally accept the number of Bulgarian casualties at the end of the uprising to be around 30,000.


==Reaction in Europe and the United States== ==Reaction in Europe and the United States==
Line 64: Line 68:
Schuyler set off for Bulgaria on July 23, four days after Baring. He was accompanied by a well-known American war correspondent, ], by a German correspondent, and by a Russian diplomat, Prince Aleksei Tseretelev. Schuyler set off for Bulgaria on July 23, four days after Baring. He was accompanied by a well-known American war correspondent, ], by a German correspondent, and by a Russian diplomat, Prince Aleksei Tseretelev.


Schuyler's group spent three weeks visiting ] and other villages where massacres had taken place. Schuyler's official report, published in November 1876, said that fifty-eight villages in Bulgaria had been destroyed, five monasteries demolished, and fifteen thousand people in all massacred. The report was reprinted as a booklet and widely circulated in Europe.<ref name="Bulgaria 1876"/> Schuyler's group spent three weeks visiting ] and other villages where massacres had taken place. Schuyler's official report, published in November 1876, said that fifty-eight villages in Bulgaria had been destroyed, five monasteries demolished, and fifteen thousand people in all massacred. The report was reprinted as a booklet and widely circulated in Europe.<ref>{{cite book|last=MacGahan|first= Januarius A.|title= Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the "Daily News," J.A. MacGahan, Esq. |publisher=Bradbury Agnew and Co. |location= London |year= 1876|chapter= |url=http://archive.org/details/MacGahanTurkishAtrocitiesInBulgaria |pages= |accessdate=29 September 2013}}</ref>


Baring's report to the British government about the massacres was similar, but put the number of victims at about twelve thousand. Baring's report to the British government about the massacres was similar, but put the number of victims at about twelve thousand.
Line 70: Line 74:
A century later, one historian claimed that the number killed was exaggerated, and was closer to three thousand.<ref>Richard Millman, "The Bulgarian Massacres Reconsidered", in '']'', Vol. 58, No. 2, (April, 1980), p230.</ref> But it is difficult to ignore the accounts of MacGahan, Schuyler and Baring, who visited the massacre sites three months after they occurred, and saw many of the unburied corpses. The actual number of victims will never be known. A century later, one historian claimed that the number killed was exaggerated, and was closer to three thousand.<ref>Richard Millman, "The Bulgarian Massacres Reconsidered", in '']'', Vol. 58, No. 2, (April, 1980), p230.</ref> But it is difficult to ignore the accounts of MacGahan, Schuyler and Baring, who visited the massacre sites three months after they occurred, and saw many of the unburied corpses. The actual number of victims will never be known.


MacGahan's vivid articles from Bulgaria moved British public opinion against Turkey. He described in particular what he had seen in the town of Batak, where five thousand of a total of seven thousand residents had been slaughtered, beheaded or burned alive by Turkish irregulars, and their bodies left in piles around the town square and the church. He described "Skulls with gray hair still attached to them, dark tresses which had once adorned the heads of maidens, the mutilated trunks of men, the rotting limbs of children..."<ref>MavGahan, ''Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria''.</ref> MacGahan's vivid articles from Bulgaria moved British public opinion against Turkey. He described in particular what he had seen in the town of Batak, where five thousand of a total of seven thousand residents had been slaughtered, beheaded or burned alive by Turkish irregulars, and their bodies left in piles around the town square and the church. He described "Skulls with gray hair still attached to them, dark tresses which had once adorned the heads of maidens, the mutilated trunks of men, the rotting limbs of children..."<ref>{{cite book|last=MacGahan|first= Januarius A.|title= Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the "Daily News," J.A. MacGahan, Esq. |publisher=Bradbury Agnew and Co. |location= London |year= 1876|chapter= |url=http://archive.org/details/MacGahanTurkishAtrocitiesInBulgaria |pages= |accessdate=29 September 2013}}</ref>


The political impact of the reports was immediate and dramatic. The leader of the British opposition, ], wrote a booklet denouncing what he called "the Bulgarian Horrors", and calling upon Britain to withdraw its support for Turkey. "I entreat my countrymen", he wrote, "upon whom far more than upon any other people in Europe it depends, to require and to insist that our government, which has been working in one direction, shall work in the other, and shall apply all its vigor to concur with the states of Europe in obtaining the extinction of the Turkish executive power in Bulgaria. Let the Turks now carry away their abuses in the only possible manner, namely, by carrying off themselves...."<ref>{{cite book|last=Gladstone|first= William Ewart|coauthors=|title= Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East |publisher= J Murray |location= London |date= 1876|chapter= |url= http://www.archive.org/details/bulgarianhorrors00gladiala |pages= 31 |accessdate= 2 February 2013}}</ref> The political impact of the reports was immediate and dramatic. The leader of the British opposition, ], wrote a booklet denouncing what he called "the Bulgarian Horrors", and calling upon Britain to withdraw its support for Turkey. "I entreat my countrymen", he wrote, "upon whom far more than upon any other people in Europe it depends, to require and to insist that our government, which has been working in one direction, shall work in the other, and shall apply all its vigor to concur with the states of Europe in obtaining the extinction of the Turkish executive power in Bulgaria. Let the Turks now carry away their abuses in the only possible manner, namely, by carrying off themselves...."<ref>{{cite book|last=Gladstone|first= William Ewart|title= Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East |publisher= J Murray |location= London |year= 1876|chapter= |url= http://www.archive.org/details/bulgarianhorrors00gladiala |pages= 31 |accessdate= 2 February 2013}}</ref><ref>See also {{cite book|last=Gladstone|first= William Ewart|title= Lessons in Massacre; or the Conduct of the Turkish Government in and about Bulgaria since May 1876; chiefly from papers presented by command|publisher= J Murray |location= London |year= 1877|chapter= |url=http://archive.org/stream/cu31924028512436#page/n3/mode/2up |accessdate= 2 September 2013}}</ref>


Prominent Europeans, including ], ], ], and ], spoke against the Turkish behavior in Bulgaria. When the ] started in 1877, the Turkish Government asked Britain for help, but the British government refused, citing public outrage caused by the Bulgarian massacres as the reason. Prominent Europeans, including ], ], ], and ], spoke against the Turkish behavior in Bulgaria. When the ] started in 1877, the Turkish Government asked Britain for help, but the British government refused, citing public outrage caused by the Bulgarian massacres as the reason.
Line 79: Line 83:


==See also== ==See also==
{{commonscat}}
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 96: Line 102:
* Mazower, Mark. ''The Balkans''. Weidenfeld & Nicolson history (20 June 2002). * Mazower, Mark. ''The Balkans''. Weidenfeld & Nicolson history (20 June 2002).
* Walter Short, . * Walter Short, .

{{Rebellions in the Ottoman Empire}}


] ]

Revision as of 07:27, 23 January 2015

For the John Butler Trio's fifth studio album, see April Uprising (album).
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
April Uprising
Part of Rise of nationalism under the Ottoman Empire
File:April Uprising 1876small8ur.jpg
Regions involved in the Stara Zagora and April revolts. The borders of the Bulgarian Principality, according to the Constantinople Conference of 1876, are indicated.
DateApril 20 - middle of May, 1876
LocationOttoman Bulgaria
Result Rebellion suppressed; Defeat of the Uprising led to the Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878)
Belligerents
Revolutionaries  Ottoman Empire
Commanders and leaders
Stefan Stambolov
Ilarion Dragostinov  
Zahari Stoyanov
Georgi Benkovski  
Hafuz Pasha
Yusuf Aga of Sofya
Hasan Pasha of Niş
Strength
around 10,000 men around 100,000 men
Casualties and losses
30,000 killed (including civilians) ?
Russo-Turkish War
(1877–1878)
Bulgarian–Ottoman conflicts

The April Uprising (Template:Lang-bg, Aprilsko vastanie) was an insurrection organised by the Bulgarians in the Ottoman Empire from April to May 1876, which indirectly resulted in the re-establishment of Bulgaria in 1878. Тhe regular Ottoman Army and irregular bashi-bazouk units brutally suppressed the rebels, leading to a public outcry in Europe and the United States, with many famous intellectuals condemning the Ottoman atrocities and supporting the oppressed Bulgarian population.

The 1876 uprising involved only those parts of the Ottoman territories populated predominantly by Bulgarians. The emergence of Bulgarian national sentiments was closely related to the re-establishment of the independent Bulgarian Orthodox Church in 1870. Together with notions of romantic nationalism the rise of national awareness became known as the Bulgarian National Revival.

Background

In Europe, in the eighteenth century, the classic non-national states were the multi-ethnic empires such as the Ottoman Empire, ruled by a Sultan and the population belonged to many ethnic groups, which spoke many languages. The idea of nation state was an increasing emphasis during the 19th century, on the ethnic and racial origins of the nations. The most noticeable characteristic was the degree to which nation states use the state as an instrument of national unity, in economic, social and cultural life. By the 18th century, the Ottomans had fallen well behind the rest of Europe in science, technology, and industry. However, the Bulgarian population was also suppressed socially and politically under Ottoman rule. Additionally, more immediate causes for the greater mobilisation compared to earlier revolts were the severe internal and external problems which the Ottoman Empire experienced in the middle of the 1870s. In 1875, taxes levied on non-Muslims were raised for fear of a state bankruptcy, which, in turn, caused additional tension between Muslims and Christians and facilitated the breakout of the Herzegovinian rebellion and the Stara Zagora revolt in Bulgaria. The failure of the Ottomans to handle the Herzegovinian uprising successfully showed the weakness of the Ottoman state while the brutalities which ensued, discredited additionally the empire to the outside world. In the late 19th century European ideas of nationalism were adopted by the Bulgarian elite.

Preparation

Rebel flag from Gorna Oryahovitsa. The text reads 'Freedom or Death'.

In November 1875, activists of the Bulgarian Revolutionary Central Committee met in the Romanian town of Giurgiu and decided that the political situation was suitable for a general uprising. The uprising was scheduled for April or May 1876. The territory of the country was divided into five revolutionary districts with centers in Vratsa, Veliko Tarnovo, Sliven, Plovdiv and Sofia.

The rebels had been hoarding arms and ammunition for some time and even constructed makeshift cannon out of cherry-wood.

In the progress of the preparation of the uprising, the organisers gave up the idea of a fifth revolutionary district in Sofia due to the deplorable situation of the local revolutionary committees and moved the centre of the fourth revolutionary district from Plovdiv to Panagyurishte. On 14 April 1876, a general meeting of the committees from the fourth revolutionary district was held in the Oborishte locality near Panagyurishte to discuss the proclamation of the insurrection. One of the delegates, however, disclosed the plot to the Ottoman authorities. On 2 May [O.S. 20 April] 1876, Ottoman police made an attempt to arrest the leader of the local revolutionary committee in Koprivshtitsa, Todor Kableshkov.

Outbreak and suppression

In conformity with the decisions taken at Oborishte, on the 20 April 1876 the local rebel committee attacked and surrounded the headquarters of the Ottoman police in Koprivshtitsa commanded by Necip Aga. At least two Ottoman police officials were killed and Necip Aga was forced to release arrested Bulgarian rebel suspects. Necip Aga and his close officials managed to escaped the siege. However due to this incident the Bulgarian rebels had to proclaim the insurrection two weeks in advance of the planned date. Within several days, the rebellion spread to the whole Sredna Gora and to a number of towns and villages in the northwestern Rhodopes. The insurrection broke out in the other revolutionary districts, as well, though on a much smaller scale. The areas of Gabrovo, Tryavna, and Pavlikeni also revolted in force, as well as several villages north and south of Sliven and near Berovo (in the present-day Republic of Macedonia).

April Uprising

The rebels attacked Muslim civilians as well as Ottoman officials and police. The number of civilians killed by the rebels is disputed. This violence is cited as provocation for the violence of Turkish forces against Bulgarian civilians during the suppression of the rebellion.

According to a contemporary report by Walter Baring, a secretary of the British Embassy to the Ottoman Empire, the Muslim civilian population was not significantly affected. This was also substantiated by the reports of Eugene Schuyler and James F. Clarke, according to whom very few peaceful Muslims were killed. This has been accepted by modern historians; for example, according to Richard Shannon less than 200 Muslims were killed, very few of them non-combatants. In fact, according to the report written by Schuyler and American journalist Januarius MacGahan, even the Ottoman government did not claim more than 500 Muslims killed, most of them in battle. (MacGahan was a close friend of Russian general Mikhail Skobelev, whom he accompanied while covering the Russo-Turkish War, including the Siege of Plevna; he was married to a Russian noblewoman. MacGahan was already favored in the Russian court after his coverage of the Siege of Khiva with the Russian Army.)

American historian Justin McCarthy, who is widely considered to have pro-Turkish views, claims that during the revolts over 1,000 Muslims were slaughtered and many more expelled. Stanford Shaw, who is also considered pro-Turkish, and whose wife was Turkish, claims that many more Muslims were killed during the April Uprising than Christians. According to Barbara Jelavich, the beginning of the April Uprising was accompanied by a massacre of Muslim civilians (without specifying casualties).

The Ottoman response was immediate and severe. They mobilized detachments of regular troops and also irregular bashi-bazouks. These forces attacked the first insurgent towns as early as 25 April. The Turkish forces massacred of civilian populations, the principal places being Panagurishte, Perushtitza, Bratzigovo, and Batak. By the middle of May, the insurrection was completely suppressed; one of the last sparks of resistance was poet Hristo Botev's attempt to come to the rebels' rescue with a detachment of Bulgarian political émigrés resident in Romania, ending with the unit's rout and Botev's death.

The most detailed contemporaneous account was that of Eugene Schuyler. After visiting some of the sites, Schuyler published a report detailing the atrocities. He reported that fifty-eight villages had been destroyed, five monasteries demolished, and fifteen thousand rebels killed.

The American historian Richard Milliman states that Schuyler visited personally only 11 of the villages he reported on. Schuyler, however certainly visited Batak and many other of the destroyed towns and villages, including Perushtitsa and Panagyurishte. Millman also claims that the accepted reality of the massacres is largely a myth. Contemporary Bulgarian historians generally accept the number of Bulgarian casualties at the end of the uprising to be around 30,000.

Reaction in Europe and the United States

Main article: Constantinople Conference

But let me tell you what we saw at Batak ... The number of children killed in these massacres is something enormous. They were often spitted on bayonets, and we have several stories from eye-witnesses who saw the little babes carried about the streets, both here and at Olluk-Kni, on the points of bayonets. The reason is simple. When a Mohammedan has killed a certain number of infidels he is sure of Paradise, no matter what his sins may be ... It was a heap of skulls, intermingled with bones from all parts of the human body, skeletons nearly entire and rotting, clothing, human hair and putrid flesh lying there in one foul heap, around which the grass was growing luxuriantly. It emitted a sickening odor, like that of a dead horse, and it was here that the dogs had been seeking a hasty repast when our untimely approach interrupted them ... The ground is covered here with skeletons, to which are clinging articles of clothing and bits of putrid flesh. The air was heavy, with a faint, sickening odor, that grows stronger as we advance. It is beginning to be horrible.

— Eyewitness account of J. A. MacGahan on Turkish atrocities in Bulgaria, in a letter to the London Daily News of August 22, 1876

News of massacres of Bulgarians reached Istanbul in May and June 1876 through Bulgarian students at Robert College, the American college in the city. Faculty members at Robert College wrote to the British Ambassador and to the Istanbul correspondents of The Times and the London Daily News.

An article about the massacres in the Daily News on June 23 provoked a question in Parliament about Britain's support for Turkey, and demands for an investigation. Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli promised to conduct an investigation about what had really happened.

In July, the British Embassy in Istanbul sent a second secretary, Walter Baring, to Bulgaria to investigate the stories of atrocities. Baring did not speak Bulgarian (although he did speak Turkish) and British policy was officially pro-Turkish, so the Bulgarian community in Istanbul feared he would not report the complete story. They asked the American Consul in Istanbul, Eugene Schuyler, to conduct his own investigation.

Konstantin Makovsky (1839–1915). The Bulgarian Martyresses (1877).

Schuyler set off for Bulgaria on July 23, four days after Baring. He was accompanied by a well-known American war correspondent, Januarius MacGahan, by a German correspondent, and by a Russian diplomat, Prince Aleksei Tseretelev.

Schuyler's group spent three weeks visiting Batak and other villages where massacres had taken place. Schuyler's official report, published in November 1876, said that fifty-eight villages in Bulgaria had been destroyed, five monasteries demolished, and fifteen thousand people in all massacred. The report was reprinted as a booklet and widely circulated in Europe.

Baring's report to the British government about the massacres was similar, but put the number of victims at about twelve thousand.

A century later, one historian claimed that the number killed was exaggerated, and was closer to three thousand. But it is difficult to ignore the accounts of MacGahan, Schuyler and Baring, who visited the massacre sites three months after they occurred, and saw many of the unburied corpses. The actual number of victims will never be known.

MacGahan's vivid articles from Bulgaria moved British public opinion against Turkey. He described in particular what he had seen in the town of Batak, where five thousand of a total of seven thousand residents had been slaughtered, beheaded or burned alive by Turkish irregulars, and their bodies left in piles around the town square and the church. He described "Skulls with gray hair still attached to them, dark tresses which had once adorned the heads of maidens, the mutilated trunks of men, the rotting limbs of children..."

The political impact of the reports was immediate and dramatic. The leader of the British opposition, William Ewart Gladstone, wrote a booklet denouncing what he called "the Bulgarian Horrors", and calling upon Britain to withdraw its support for Turkey. "I entreat my countrymen", he wrote, "upon whom far more than upon any other people in Europe it depends, to require and to insist that our government, which has been working in one direction, shall work in the other, and shall apply all its vigor to concur with the states of Europe in obtaining the extinction of the Turkish executive power in Bulgaria. Let the Turks now carry away their abuses in the only possible manner, namely, by carrying off themselves...."

Prominent Europeans, including Charles Darwin, Oscar Wilde, Victor Hugo, and Giuseppe Garibaldi, spoke against the Turkish behavior in Bulgaria. When the war with Russia started in 1877, the Turkish Government asked Britain for help, but the British government refused, citing public outrage caused by the Bulgarian massacres as the reason.

The April uprising was a failure as a revolution, but due to publicity that was given to the reprisals that followed, it led directly to European demands for reform of the Ottoman Empire, and the Russo-Turkish War, which ended in Turkish defeat, and the signing of the Treaty of San Stefano in March 1878, followed in July that year by the Treaty of Berlin. It thus ultimately achieved its original purpose, the liberation of Bulgaria from the Ottoman Empire.

See also

References

  1. Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Bulgaria/History" . Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  2. A description of how these cherry-wood cannons were made appears in the historical fiction work: Vazov, Ivan Minchov (1971) Under the yoke (Translated from the Bulgarian Под игото by Marguerite Alexieva and Theodora Atanassova.) Twayne Publishers, New York, and many other editions.
  3. A picture entitled "Plate 4.8 A wooden cannon captured from the Bulgarian insurgents by the Turks, January 1877" appears in: Crampton, R. J. (1997) A Concise History of Bulgaria Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, p. 83, ISBN 0-521-56183-3
  4. История на Българите: Военна история на българите от древността до наши дни, 2007 p. 306
  5. The Diplomatic Reminiscences of Lord Augustus Loftus. 1862-1879: Volume 2 (1894) p.170
  6. George Douglas Campbell Argyll (2005) The Eastern Question: From the Treaty of Paris, 1856, to the Treaty of Berlin, 1878, and to the Second Afghan War p.229
  7. Andrew G. Bostom (2005) The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims p.664
  8. Richard Shannon (1975) Gladstone and the Bulgarian agitation 1876 p.47
  9. MacGahan, Januarius A. (1876). Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the "Daily News", J.A. MacGahan, Esq. London: Bradbury Agnew and Co. p. 13. Retrieved 29 September 2013.
  10. Todorova, Maria Nikolaeva. Imagining the Balkans Oxford University Press, 1977, pp.106
  11. Federal Writers' Project, Writers' Program (Ohio), "The Ohio guide", The Ohio State Archeological and Historical Society, 1946, p.464
  12. Michael Mann (2005) The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing, Cambridge University Press, pp. 112-4. “… figures are derive from McCarthy (1995: I 91, 162-4, 339), who is often viewed as a scholar on the Turkish side of the debate.”
  13. McCarthy, Justin. Death and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, 1821-1922 The Darwin Press Inc., Princeton, Sixth Printing 2008, pp.60
  14. Steven T. Katz (1994) The Holocaust in Historical Context: The Holocaust and Mass Death Before the Modern Age p.87
  15. Guenter Lewy (2005) The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide p.154
  16. A. Christian van Gorder (2004) "Armenian Christians and Turkish Muslims: Atrocity, Denial and Identity" p.17
  17. Shaw and Shaw (1977) History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, Nide 2 Cambridge University Press, pp.162
  18. Jelavich, Barbara (1999) History of the Balkans: Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, Nide 1, Cambridge University Press, pp.347
  19. "Bulgaria" in the Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th Ed. (Cambridge, 1911.)
  20. MacGahan, Januarius A. (1876). "Mr. Schuyler's Preliminary Report". Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the "Daily News," J.A. MacGahan, Esq. London: Bradbury Agnew and Co. p. 89. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  21. Evelyn Schuyler Schaeffer (1901) Selected essays; Eugene Schuyler pp.66-74
  22. William Cary (1965) Bulgaria Today: the Land and the People, a Voyage of Discovery p.45
  23. Millman, Richard. The Bulgarian Massacres Reconsidered pp. 218, 227-228
  24. J. A. MacGahan on Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria
  25. MacGahan, Januarius A. (1876). Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the "Daily News," J.A. MacGahan, Esq. London: Bradbury Agnew and Co. Retrieved 29 September 2013.
  26. Richard Millman, "The Bulgarian Massacres Reconsidered", in The Slavonic and East European Review, Vol. 58, No. 2, (April, 1980), p230.
  27. MacGahan, Januarius A. (1876). Turkish Atrocities in Bulgaria, Letters of the Special Commissioner of the "Daily News," J.A. MacGahan, Esq. London: Bradbury Agnew and Co. Retrieved 29 September 2013.
  28. Gladstone, William Ewart (1876). Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East. London: J Murray. p. 31. Retrieved 2 February 2013.
  29. See also Gladstone, William Ewart (1877). Lessons in Massacre; or the Conduct of the Turkish Government in and about Bulgaria since May 1876; chiefly from papers presented by command. London: J Murray. Retrieved 2 September 2013.

Further reading

  • "Balkan Crisis and the Treaty of Berlin: 1878" from The Balkans Since 1453 by L.S. Stavrianos; http://www.suc.org/culture/history/berlin78/
  • Charles Jelavich, Barbara Jelavich, The Establishment of the Balkan National States, 1804–1920 (History of East Central Europe), University of Washington Press (Seattle, 31 December 1977).
  • Mazower, Mark. The Balkans. Weidenfeld & Nicolson history (20 June 2002).
  • Walter Short, The Massacres of the Khilafah.
Rebellions in the Ottoman Empire
Rise (1299–1453)
Classical Age (1453–1550)
Transformation (1550–1700)
Old Regime (1700–1789)
Decline (1789–1908)
Dissolution (1908–1922)
Categories: