Misplaced Pages

User talk:Theobald Tiger: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:12, 15 January 2015 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,266 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 10:13, 23 January 2015 edit undoCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators72,939 edits Arbitration clarification request closed: new sectionNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
Thought you might be interested in seeing Josq's comments at the ] page, which basically indicate that you were actually doing good and welcome productive work on the Landmark content. If you have any interest in returning at any time, I hope you know that, basically, your name has been cleared in this matter. ] (]) 16:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC) Thought you might be interested in seeing Josq's comments at the ] page, which basically indicate that you were actually doing good and welcome productive work on the Landmark content. If you have any interest in returning at any time, I hope you know that, basically, your name has been cleared in this matter. ] (]) 16:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
*And I saw on the Dutch wiki you were unblocked by good old {{U|Wikiklaas}}. ] (]) 19:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC) *And I saw on the Dutch wiki you were unblocked by good old {{U|Wikiklaas}}. ] (]) 19:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

== Arbitration clarification request closed ==

This is a courtesy message to inform you that an arbitration ] in which you were listed as a party has been closed and archived with a motion being enacted which authorises ] for the topic of ], broadly construed. For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 10:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:13, 23 January 2015

Vindication

Thought you might be interested in seeing Josq's comments at the WP:ARCA page, which basically indicate that you were actually doing good and welcome productive work on the Landmark content. If you have any interest in returning at any time, I hope you know that, basically, your name has been cleared in this matter. John Carter (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration clarification request closed

This is a courtesy message to inform you that an arbitration clarification request in which you were listed as a party has been closed and archived with a motion being enacted which authorises standard discretionary sanctions for the topic of Landmark Worldwide, broadly construed. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)