| Revision as of 21:30, 26 January 2015 view sourceGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers380,344 edits →Feelings: share← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:45, 26 January 2015 view source Viriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,039 edits →Feelings: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| : Agree, with ], - thanks for the review, --] (]) 21:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC) | : Agree, with ], - thanks for the review, --] (]) 21:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :FWIW, the rape analogy was a misinterpretation, and I've pointed it out on the talk page of the user who made it. Please come back when you feel calm and relaxed. ] (]) 23:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:45, 26 January 2015
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Have a cup of coffee until then. Wikiproject Editor retention say hello. Hafspajen (talk) 19:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC) |
A cookie for you!
|
Have some cookies too. Hafspajen (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC) |
- …and seconded. That was a mind-boggling misinterpretation of what you wrote. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 19:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Feelings
I understand completely why you would feel so aggrieved, the comparison in question was beyond reproach yet the lordly admins involved completely overlooked it. Another editor or two I've encountered lately seem happy to use such analogies, regardless of how despicable they are. Don't be a stranger. Good luck. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Agree, with music of passion, - thanks for the review, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- FWIW, the rape analogy was a misinterpretation, and I've pointed it out on the talk page of the user who made it. Please come back when you feel calm and relaxed. Viriditas (talk) 23:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC)