| Revision as of 16:51, 26 January 2015 editThirdright (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,531 edits →Landmark Worldwide: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:46, 28 January 2015 edit undoManul (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,647 edits →Landmark DS: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| Thanks for {{diff|Landmark_Worldwide|644271524|644202810|this removal}}. Of course CEO is not Chairman... bleary-eyed edit on my part. Cheers, ] (]) 16:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC) | Thanks for {{diff|Landmark_Worldwide|644271524|644202810|this removal}}. Of course CEO is not Chairman... bleary-eyed edit on my part. Cheers, ] (]) 16:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Landmark DS == | |||
| {{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| Apologies for this bureaucratic silliness, but according to the labyrinthine ] system you aren't "alerted". Which doesn't make sense because you were part of the arbitration case, but bureaucracies seldom make sense. ''] ~ ]'' 01:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:46, 28 January 2015
| This is Astynax's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
| Note: contents of this page are periodically archived by a bot. If there have been no recent posts here, that can result in no messages being displayed below. Older messages are still readable in the archives (above). New messages may be added here. If you post a message here, I will usually reply on this page, unless the conversation started on your talk page or elsewhere. |
Arbitration clarification request closed
This is a courtesy message to inform you that an arbitration clarification request in which you were listed as a party has been closed and archived with a motion being enacted which authorises standard discretionary sanctions for the topic of Landmark Worldwide, broadly construed. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Landmark Worldwide
Thanks for this removal. Of course CEO is not Chairman... bleary-eyed edit on my part. Cheers, Tgeairn (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Landmark DS
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Landmark Worldwide, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Apologies for this bureaucratic silliness, but according to the labyrinthine WP:AC/DS system you aren't "alerted". Which doesn't make sense because you were part of the arbitration case, but bureaucracies seldom make sense. Manul ~ talk 01:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)