Revision as of 21:46, 29 January 2015 editFlossumPossum (talk | contribs)109 edits →Leave me alone: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:06, 29 January 2015 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,338 edits declineNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== January 2015 == | == January 2015 == | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing because it appears that you are not here to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. ] 21:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Uw-nothere --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing because it appears that you are not here to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. ] 21:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Uw-nothere --> | ||
{{unblock|reason=I have never made a non constructive edit to an article, and didn't even know I was apparently blocked indefinitely until I tried to save my changes to the world of warcraft warlords of draenor page. Please provide an actual reason as well, that reason means absolutely nothing.] (]) 21:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|reason=I have never made a non constructive edit to an article, and didn't even know I was apparently blocked indefinitely until I tried to save my changes to the world of warcraft warlords of draenor page. Please provide an actual reason as well, that reason means absolutely nothing.] (]) 21:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)|decline=You described the purpose of your account as to "test out functionality", and although you haven't vandalized, you don't seem to be focussed on contributing to the encyclopedia. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. ] (]) 22:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)}} | ||
== Leave me alone == | == Leave me alone == |
Revision as of 22:06, 29 January 2015
FlossumPossum, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi FlossumPossum! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2015 (UTC) |
January 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 21:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
FlossumPossum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have never made a non constructive edit to an article, and didn't even know I was apparently blocked indefinitely until I tried to save my changes to the world of warcraft warlords of draenor page. Please provide an actual reason as well, that reason means absolutely nothing.FlossumPossum (talk) 21:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You described the purpose of your account as to "test out functionality", and although you haven't vandalized, you don't seem to be focussed on contributing to the encyclopedia. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Leave me alone
I see a few people and an admin engaging in conversation about me offsite, please leave me alone, I don't really care what your arguments or issues are. The particular admin needs to leave me alone especially as I've been nothing but civil to them. Thanks to the folks who found me outside wiki and linked me to it. I'd like not to be harassed just for being a new editor who likes games/anime/power rangers/etc who just lent their opinion and did their best to fix things. FlossumPossum (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)