Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Lulu Wang: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:04, 30 January 2015 editMaranoFan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,094 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Lulu Wang. (TW Revision as of 21:40, 30 January 2015 edit undoChasewc91 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,745 edits Lulu Wang: commentNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources AFD|Lulu Wang}}) :({{Find sources AFD|Lulu Wang}})
This article does not meet ] or ]. Contains a lot of factual errors, no major coverage in reliable sources. ] ] 10:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC) This article does not meet ] or ]. Contains a lot of factual errors, no major coverage in reliable sources. ] ] 10:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

*'''Comment''': The creator of this article, {{u|Drmies}}, delisted ] – an article the nominator has worked on extensively – as a good article a few hours before this nomination was made. Seems like a classic case of ]. I'm remaining neutral for now, though a quick Google search showed at least some coverage: –''''']''''' (] / ]) 21:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:40, 30 January 2015

Lulu Wang

Lulu Wang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG. Contains a lot of factual errors, no major coverage in reliable sources. MaRAno 10:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment: The creator of this article, Drmies, delisted Lips Are Movin – an article the nominator has worked on extensively – as a good article a few hours before this nomination was made. Seems like a classic case of WP:REVENGE. I'm remaining neutral for now, though a quick Google search showed at least some coverage: Chase (talk / contribs) 21:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Categories: