Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:25, 4 February 2015

NFT.com - Caps

Please see the discussion here (http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#NFT.com_caps). It turns out I was correct, and Mr. Balboa has 14 caps, not 16. Please alter it, ALL NON-FIFA appearances do not count.

Happy weekend --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Time travels

No, just updated to the end of the Portuguese round, which occurs today not yesterday (Belenenses played on Saturday, round ended on Sunday and sometimes it even ends on Monday), since it ended somewhere around 31 JANUARY you could round it to the midnight of the following day. I did that in several hundred players and encountered no problems, until now I see. I also see you went to correct me and inserted 31 FEBRUARY 2015 instead of 31 JANUARY.

Attentively --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

• Not in the case of Balboa (links), since he spent ages in our country ZEROZERO and FORADEJOGO are more important than SOCCERWAY. BDFUTBOL, in Balboa's case (Spanish by birth) is the primary one. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Also, about Miguel Vítor, I think the user BEN17 reverted me on purpose, I corrected several red links and titles of refs (ex. MIGUEL VÍTOR, not FORADEJOGO PROFILE!), he reverted me just because, maybe because my messages to him or my past reversions. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

• I agree with most of them, but the official website should come last, first sporting links then personal ones. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Even if they are red instead of blue? OK... I have also left him a message, not that he will care. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

• Like you told me before, that they are listed first does not mean it's correct. I bet it's YET ANOTHER of those cases, no consensus and only a matter of preference. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

I don't know where on earth you see all that in the title (M. Vítor's Soccerway profile) but I give up, I only replaced one dash. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 19:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

About the commas (sorry, only now noticed that part of the message), I thought it was correct usage of English. Is it not? --84.90.219.128 (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

I guess if I tell you I have seen thousands of articles (not edited myself, seen) with only the player's name (or the way it is presented in the website) and not that you won't change your opinion. Like I said, it stays your way. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 19:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

• I don't hold much faith in you believing in me, but here it goes: Pablo Aimar, does not matter what section it is, if you link an item once, it's OVERLINKING if you do it again. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 01:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Another editor has already beat you to it and reverted me. OK, another WP:FOOTY discussion! --84.90.219.128 (talk) 04:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Last sentence in Aimar's club career was 100% correct, no need for any correction. After "Aimar" (or another player's name), you don't need to say "Aimar" for the rest of the paragraph, "he" suffices OK? --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

• I have made the sentence more presentable now (or tried to), my last edit in Aimar's article. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

David Luiz

O.K. I replaced the dead link, but sources don't require to be online. Therefore, you just wanted to edit war with me and as you know, this is against our policies (just a heads up warning).--Mishae (talk) 16:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

If a link is dead and there is no copy in the archives, what's the point of kipping it? O' and removing links are not against the policies, sources are not required to be online.--Mishae (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

The problem is, is that the site that I replace it with sounds less official. Campeoes do Futebol is less official (I think) then CBF which was dead, but that's the only one I could find.--Mishae (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

George Tzavellas

I changed the player's number that if you try to know about the player or just see in PAOK FC squad he wears the shirt with the number 3, not to be announced (as he playes for PAOK for over a year!) and if you a have ever watched the player a bit you'd know that he cannot play as a center back. If it's a second position that he could play was as a Left Midfielder. So, my changes not just there were minor, also there were erasing the lies about the position and the number which he has for over a year from now. You can find out that I'm right before undoing my improvements to the article with not any significant excuses. If you don't know, don't change and let the others who know to do it! Thank you!--BEN917 (talk) 21:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Joan Capdevila

Since he seems to be retired from both the Spanish and the Catalan NT, you reverted me because... --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

• Are you kidding man? I removed the update, the NT one (and you reverted me), he is retired from national team(s), not from clubs. When a player is retired from his national team (or teams) but is still playing club football, you remove the NT but keep the PC. I am going to remove it again. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 17:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Ah, you already took care of that, thank you. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

No, it is correct now my fellow user: 1 FEBRUARY 2015 for his Lierse caps (Capdevila is playing club football still), no date for his international appearances, as there are/will be no more. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 17:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

2014–15 S.L. Benfica season

Damn, that's a shame. Thanks for telling me! The Replicator (talk) 02:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Minor editing

Odd, so if I add something its not minor? What if I archive links, is this considered minor? Plus, your behavior of templating me was outrageous and wrong. I was on Misplaced Pages since 2009, obviously I am not a newbie. According to the template only newbies can be tagged with such template, experienced users don't need to be.--Mishae (talk) 21:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)