| Revision as of 14:41, 13 February 2015 editRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits →Confused: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:45, 13 February 2015 edit undoCoffee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,540 edits →Confused: this fucking site sometimesNext edit → | ||
| Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
| :::{{ping|Callanecc}} I'm fairly certain that the one place that IAR does not apply is to DS. A normal admin action, you might've been fine with. However, under DS there is a strict procedure. You did not issue the appropriate alert, and hence this user could not be blocked under DS. Please read ]. The talk page notice is not sufficient. Regardless, can you please explain you reasons for blocking? ] — ] 14:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | :::{{ping|Callanecc}} I'm fairly certain that the one place that IAR does not apply is to DS. A normal admin action, you might've been fine with. However, under DS there is a strict procedure. You did not issue the appropriate alert, and hence this user could not be blocked under DS. Please read ]. The talk page notice is not sufficient. Regardless, can you please explain you reasons for blocking? ] — ] 14:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Actually, my friend, IAR applies sitewide as it is itself a ] upon which the entire site (including ArbCom) is built from in the first place. '''''"If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Misplaced Pages, ignore it."''''' And you can stop unecessarily pinging Callanecc, clerks have no authority over Discretionary Sanctions imposed by other adminstrators. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 14:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | ::::Actually, my friend, IAR applies sitewide as it is itself a ] upon which the entire site (including ArbCom) is built from in the first place. '''''"If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Misplaced Pages, ignore it."''''' And you can stop unecessarily pinging Callanecc, clerks have no authority over Discretionary Sanctions imposed by other adminstrators. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 14:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :::::It only applies if there is a reason for applying it, and you've not provided one. I pinged Callanecc because I want to know if this was acceptable, and I'm sure he could tell me. If you insist, however, on being utterly defiant, I'll take it to AE. ] — ] 14:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I've opened an AE thread. ] — ] 14:41, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::{{ec}}If you'll note, above I stated that I'd handle the forgotten logging situation. I did and provided the reasoning, as required, there. If I may ask, why do you seem have a cactus lodged up your ass? This editor was editing with an agenda in violation of the purpose of this site (and in an area covered by ArbCom Sanctions) and was clearly ] to help build an encyclopedia. His being blocked was '''surely''' an improvement to the encyclopedia. Yet, you're jumping up and down about the fact that it was a ''particular'' block that was used (when NOTHERE, indef vandalism, or any of a myriad of other blocking reasons could have also worked). Jesus christ, give it a rest. <small>Or take it to AE if you like unessecary drama.</small> <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 14:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:45, 13 February 2015
| This is Coffee's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 |
|
Deletion review for 2016 NHL Entry Draft
An editor has asked for a deletion review of 2016 NHL Entry Draft. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Relisting AfDs
Please note that when you relist AfD discussions, you should remove them from that day's AfD log (by commenting the entry out) and list them on the current day's log. Several of your recent closes were not moved (I fixed them, don't worry). You may want to consider using a tool, like User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD, to automate the process so that you don't forget in the future. Happy editing! – Philosopher 22:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Philosopher:I use that script actually, perhaps I relisted them too close together or some shit. Anyways thanks for the clean up. Cheers, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
CashOrCard POS deletion
Hi,
I see that you deleted the CashOrCard POS page as it seems to be an advertisement - I'm happy to rewrite it as you see fit as it was meant to be an informational article related to cloud-based point of sale and what new developments are in this space. Of course, full disclaimer is that I am indeed one of the directors, so therefore I really want to make sure that the article comes across as unbiased and factual (I tried to include external references as much as possible to support the facts).
Please let me know how I could rewrite it to present facts rather than opinion, and what specifically triggered you to believe it should be removed.
Thanks!
John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncstaunton (talk • contribs) 14:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Help
Good evening user:Coffee. May I request that you send the deleted Hotstox page to my area and if possible give me more guidance please.
Manythanks Nij 18:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nij4829 (talk • contribs)
Hi Coffee, please can you send the deleted page to my sandbox. Nij 19:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nij4829 (talk • contribs)
Good afternoon. Can you restore the page Sergey Zonenko. We have removed the entire sentence that you want to have links. All information has been confirmed. More than a week you had no claim to the page. Explain what the problem is.Ogeldke (talk) 09:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
SwatExchange
Coffee--
Please state what is wrong with the page SwatExchange? It has been deleted a second time with all the recommended changes?
It is not promotional nor advertising?
It simply states what the site does, when it was created, and the slogan.
Please advise
SummersW (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry but I don't advise paid editors how to advertise on our site. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Welcome back
That is all. Keegan (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keegan: Thank you! And thanks for the card while I was in treatment by the way. :) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:53, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Welcome back from me as well. — Ched : ? 03:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Danke. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Confused
@Callanecc: Whilst the editor in question was nothing but disruptive, I wonder why you blocked User:Russian editor1996. According to your block notice, you issued the block under WP:ARBEE. However, it is not logged at WP:AC/DSL/2015 as such. What's more, the editor was never issued an alert per WP:AC/DS. Can you explain the reasoning for issuing this indefinite block, for no apparent reason without following the proper DS procedure? I'm pinging an ArbCom clerk to review the situation. RGloucester — ☎ 02:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- RGloucester: In this case IAR, but I did forget about the logging. I'll handle that now. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- You'll also notice that there is a blanket warning on the talk page of one of the articles in question that this editor edited that states that "Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process." - But, my previous comment still stands. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Callanecc: I'm fairly certain that the one place that IAR does not apply is to DS. A normal admin action, you might've been fine with. However, under DS there is a strict procedure. You did not issue the appropriate alert, and hence this user could not be blocked under DS. Please read WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts. The talk page notice is not sufficient. Regardless, can you please explain you reasons for blocking? RGloucester — ☎ 14:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, my friend, IAR applies sitewide as it is itself a pillar upon which the entire site (including ArbCom) is built from in the first place. "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Misplaced Pages, ignore it." And you can stop unecessarily pinging Callanecc, clerks have no authority over Discretionary Sanctions imposed by other adminstrators. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- It only applies if there is a reason for applying it, and you've not provided one. I pinged Callanecc because I want to know if this was acceptable, and I'm sure he could tell me. If you insist, however, on being utterly defiant, I'll take it to AE. RGloucester — ☎ 14:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- I've opened an AE thread. RGloucester — ☎ 14:41, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)If you'll note, above I stated that I'd handle the forgotten logging situation. I did and provided the reasoning, as required, there. If I may ask, why do you seem have a cactus lodged up your ass? This editor was editing with an agenda in violation of the purpose of this site (and in an area covered by ArbCom Sanctions) and was clearly WP:NOTHERE to help build an encyclopedia. His being blocked was surely an improvement to the encyclopedia. Yet, you're jumping up and down about the fact that it was a particular block that was used (when NOTHERE, indef vandalism, or any of a myriad of other blocking reasons could have also worked). Jesus christ, give it a rest. Or take it to AE if you like unessecary drama. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- It only applies if there is a reason for applying it, and you've not provided one. I pinged Callanecc because I want to know if this was acceptable, and I'm sure he could tell me. If you insist, however, on being utterly defiant, I'll take it to AE. RGloucester — ☎ 14:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, my friend, IAR applies sitewide as it is itself a pillar upon which the entire site (including ArbCom) is built from in the first place. "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Misplaced Pages, ignore it." And you can stop unecessarily pinging Callanecc, clerks have no authority over Discretionary Sanctions imposed by other adminstrators. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Callanecc: I'm fairly certain that the one place that IAR does not apply is to DS. A normal admin action, you might've been fine with. However, under DS there is a strict procedure. You did not issue the appropriate alert, and hence this user could not be blocked under DS. Please read WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts. The talk page notice is not sufficient. Regardless, can you please explain you reasons for blocking? RGloucester — ☎ 14:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- You'll also notice that there is a blanket warning on the talk page of one of the articles in question that this editor edited that states that "Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process." - But, my previous comment still stands. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)