Revision as of 18:26, 16 February 2015 editRainmaker23 (talk | contribs)1,160 edits Undid revision 647428308 by Nafsadh (talk) atleast don't remove my response← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:28, 16 February 2015 edit undoRainmaker23 (talk | contribs)1,160 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
AKON DIALLO <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | AKON DIALLO <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
== History == | |||
The history section is an absolute mess. Too many pictures and sections. But surprisingly, not even a single image of Bangladesh's archaeological sites. I think it would be better to divide the text into two parts- Early history and 20th & 21st century. It should include pictures of the country's two world heritage sites in archaeology, and perhaps a template on Bangladeshi history, giving access to pages of successive historical periods and kingdoms. The text eventually needs to be improved. But I think we should first bring it a more organized look in order to keep sync with the rest of the article. --] (]) 12:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:The history section was an absolute mess. It was turned into present better position with much care from several members of the community. If you feel there are improvements to make, feel free to do it. The section already has 5 subsections. Once it was just divided into two section (as you suggested), that did not work very well. Keep the five sections. I am not sure if we can fit some photos of archaeological sites, but at least one should be somewhere in the article. – ''] ] ]'' 17:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:: Every history section in a country article includes pictures of archaeology. And I haven't seen a single country with such little subsections, and that again with convulted ''See also'' lists. It is a complete mess and others have said so as well. Another Bangladeshi editor also mentioned that images should have the country's background. The text also needs to be changed. The five sections will go.--] (]) 18:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::If you have a suggested rewrite, post it here :) – ''] ] ]'' 00:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::I'll have it in my sandbox when I do it. You need to quit your attitude and learn to engage. You don't know who I am.--] (]) 18:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::::I'd love to see that. BTW, I may have to learn a lot of thing, but you are probably the one who also need to learn a lot more things. I do not need to know your identity. I reveal mine, and you have your right to hide. I do and will watch the pages I have interest in. – ''] ] ]'' 06:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::::I don't need any lessons from you. I was nice to you for a long time. But you have an awful vendetta against me for. Sometimes I made foolish edits. But that does not give you the right to stalk me and block my every turn. You don't respect me, I won't respect you. Simple as that.--] (]) 06:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:28, 16 February 2015
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bangladesh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Bangladesh is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 14, 2006. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on 19 dates. March 26, 2004, November 13, 2004, December 16, 2004, March 26, 2005, December 16, 2005, March 26, 2006, December 16, 2006, March 26, 2007, December 16, 2007, March 26, 2008, December 16, 2008, March 26, 2009, December 16, 2009, March 26, 2010, December 16, 2010, March 26, 2011, March 26, 2012, March 26, 2013, and March 26, 2014 |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bangladesh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2014
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
166.48.92.200 (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC) I found that our stake is at end so i need to put exact numbers of money we got from exports.
- Not done: as you have not requested a specific change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 21:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Needs "environment" section
I haven't seen an addition of "Environment" section and details of fauna and flora. I think an addition would be nice, so readers would know more about how wildlife in Bangladesh is. --George Ho (talk) 22:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing it up. I started the section today. Would be great if anyone would add to it, especially on issues like conservation and research.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2014
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The wiki page says that Bangladesh drives on the left. This is incorrect. Please change it to right. SudoHack (talk) 09:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not done How that is incorrect? Bangladesh drives on the left. Faizan 09:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2015
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please provide latest GDP (nominal), GDP (PPP) etc. because here the provided data is backdated Raf1061 (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: as you have not requested specific changes.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2015
AKON DIALLO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.83.12.91 (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
History
The history section is an absolute mess. Too many pictures and sections. But surprisingly, not even a single image of Bangladesh's archaeological sites. I think it would be better to divide the text into two parts- Early history and 20th & 21st century. It should include pictures of the country's two world heritage sites in archaeology, and perhaps a template on Bangladeshi history, giving access to pages of successive historical periods and kingdoms. The text eventually needs to be improved. But I think we should first bring it a more organized look in order to keep sync with the rest of the article. --Rainmaker23 (talk) 12:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- The history section was an absolute mess. It was turned into present better position with much care from several members of the community. If you feel there are improvements to make, feel free to do it. The section already has 5 subsections. Once it was just divided into two section (as you suggested), that did not work very well. Keep the five sections. I am not sure if we can fit some photos of archaeological sites, but at least one should be somewhere in the article. – nafSadh did say 17:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Every history section in a country article includes pictures of archaeology. And I haven't seen a single country with such little subsections, and that again with convulted See also lists. It is a complete mess and others have said so as well. Another Bangladeshi editor also mentioned that images should have the country's background. The text also needs to be changed. The five sections will go.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- If you have a suggested rewrite, post it here :) – nafSadh did say 00:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'll have it in my sandbox when I do it. You need to quit your attitude and learn to engage. You don't know who I am.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'd love to see that. BTW, I may have to learn a lot of thing, but you are probably the one who also need to learn a lot more things. I do not need to know your identity. I reveal mine, and you have your right to hide. I do and will watch the pages I have interest in. – nafSadh did say 06:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- I don't need any lessons from you. I was nice to you for a long time. But you have an awful vendetta against me for. Sometimes I made foolish edits. But that does not give you the right to stalk me and block my every turn. You don't respect me, I won't respect you. Simple as that.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 06:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'll have it in my sandbox when I do it. You need to quit your attitude and learn to engage. You don't know who I am.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- If you have a suggested rewrite, post it here :) – nafSadh did say 00:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Every history section in a country article includes pictures of archaeology. And I haven't seen a single country with such little subsections, and that again with convulted See also lists. It is a complete mess and others have said so as well. Another Bangladeshi editor also mentioned that images should have the country's background. The text also needs to be changed. The five sections will go.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Selected anniversaries (March 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2011)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2012)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2013)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2014)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Bangladesh articles
- Top-importance Bangladesh articles
- Help of History Workgroup of Bangladesh needed
- Help of Geography Workgroup of Bangladesh needed
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles