| Revision as of 08:34, 17 February 2015 editBloom6132 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,361 editsm Reverted edits by 70.196.131.82 (talk) to last version by Bloom6132← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:11, 17 February 2015 edit undo70.196.131.82 (talk) →Khanjar warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | == Your ] nomination of ]== | ||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 22:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 22:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == ] warning == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| ] (]) 09:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:11, 17 February 2015
| This is Bloom6132's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
 |
|
25 DYK nominations medal
|
The 25 DYK Nomination Medal | |
| It takes an intrepid editor to search for good work by other editors and come up with a catchy hook. You're doing it! Thank you from all of us at the DYK project for supplying those new articles. Yoninah (talk) 11:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC) |
The Inside Corner : January 25, 2015
What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:- Project news: hidden infobox text, free e-book access, distance of Mays's catch
- Around the horn: Hall of Fame inductees, record contract
- Showcase: Pedro Martínez
- Opinion: calling for contributors
- Read the newsletter
- unsubscribe
- sent on behalf of WikiProject Baseball by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2014 National League Wild Card Game
The article 2014 National League Wild Card Game you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2014 National League Wild Card Game for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2014 National League Wild Card Game
The article 2014 National League Wild Card Game you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:2014 National League Wild Card Game for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Khanjar warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 70.196.131.82 (talk) 09:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)