| Revision as of 03:12, 11 September 2012 editTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,430 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ItsLassieTime/Archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:33, 19 February 2015 edit undoVictoriaearle (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers62,095 edits hope I've done this rightNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|ItsLassieTime}} | {{SPIarchive notice|ItsLassieTime}} | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| ==19 February 2015== | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Rationalobserver}} | |||
| *{{U|ItsLassieTime}} has had many confirmed socks, (see ]), and I've scrubbed quite a lot of the work done by the various accounts, but mostly work done by the account {{u|Susanne2009NYC}}. A couple of days ago I saw an edit summary that made me think of that account. This RO is similar in tone . Yesterday I saw on {{u|SlimVirgin}}'s talk page and it struck me as equally similar. | |||
| *Because I've spent so much time scrutinizing ItsLassieTime's work, I decided to take a look at ], which RO wrote. I found the source online , and only ten pages in found these instances of close paraphrasing that I posted to the talk page . I also posted to talk ] because the same material is in both articles, but that post got reverted, . I've pinged {{u|Moonriddengirl}} and am pinging {{u|Ruhrfisch}} who also might recognize the style. I did have a fair amount of harassment from ItsLassietime on my talk and might have some old IPs but at this point I believe it would all be stale and we have to go on behavioral patterns. Also pinging {{u|Montanabw}}, who I believe, knows ItsLassietime from one of the other accounts. | |||
| *Less telling, but still are these edit summaries using "oops" or a variation of it, found on a very quick scan of contribs, , and . Thanks. ] (]) 18:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:33, 19 February 2015
ItsLassieTime
ItsLassieTime (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ItsLassieTime/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/ItsLassieTime.
19 February 2015
- Rationalobserver (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ItsLassieTime has had many confirmed socks, (see Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of ItsLassieTime), and I've scrubbed quite a lot of the work done by the various accounts, but mostly work done by the account Susanne2009NYC. A couple of days ago I saw an edit summary that made me think of that account. This RO comment is similar in tone this Susanne2009NYC comment. Yesterday I saw this RO comment on SlimVirgin's talk page and it struck me as equally similar.
- Because I've spent so much time scrutinizing ItsLassieTime's work, I decided to take a look at Rose-Baley Party, which RO wrote. I found the source online here, and only ten pages in found these instances of close paraphrasing that I posted to the talk page here. I also posted here to talk Irataba because the same material is in both articles, but that post got reverted, . I've pinged Moonriddengirl and am pinging Ruhrfisch who also might recognize the style. I did have a fair amount of harassment from ItsLassietime on my talk and might have some old IPs but at this point I believe it would all be stale and we have to go on behavioral patterns. Also pinging Montanabw, who I believe, knows ItsLassietime from one of the other accounts.
- Less telling, but still are these edit summaries using "oops" or a variation of it, found on a very quick scan of contribs, RO here, and Susanne here on the first rev-deleted edit. Thanks. Victoria (tk) 18:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)