| Revision as of 10:49, 20 February 2015 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,879 edits →Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/The incredible small-headed horse← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:42, 20 February 2015 edit undoUnbuttered Parsnip (talk | contribs)15,948 edits →Same to you: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 234: | Line 234: | ||
| </div></div> | </div></div> | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=647462565 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=647462565 --> | ||
| == Same to you == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]'''. | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> | |||
| '''I{{'}}'''m the one adding new material, and corrections of grammar / spelling / syntax / lexis/ fact / style; '''you{{'}}'''re the one automatically blindly reverting. | |||
| -- ] (]) mytime= Fri 21:42, wikitime= 13:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:42, 20 February 2015
Please leave a message; I'll reply here.
Template:Archive box collapsible The KingsmanA friendly warning that you have reached your 3 revert limit for The Kingsman article. Please maintain the discussion on the talk page instead of continuing the edit war. If the consensus is to add the gag, then it can be added back to the article. It won't hurt the page with it gone for the time being, but if the consensus is to keep then please respect that as well. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
OlivierI've just spotted the barnstar on my page and shortly afterwards clocked the reason for it. Well done to both of us, I say, for getting LO to Featured Article. It has been a huge pleasure working with you on it (and occasionally moaning at you about the difficulty of the task). I reread the article with a reasonably fresh eye yesterday, and I really believe one can't see the joins between the bits each of us wrote. Well played, partner! Tim riley talk 23:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
You are very kind – it's a bit of a fluke having it happen with a few hours of JB hitting the front page (and the day after the Betjeman list was on the front page too!), but a very pleasant one! – SchroCat (talk) 09:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC) User:SchroCat/litter tray 15I don't know what this is? Lol — ₳aron 11:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
An award for you!
A hearty congrats too on promoting CR!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy noticeHi SchroCat. This is a courtesy notice that you have been mentioned at ANI: Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User SchroCat is vandalizing my talk page. Best, -- Diannaa (talk) 23:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
RE:It is a sequel. Ralph Fiennes has taken over as M, as seen at the end of Skyfall. Plus Jesper Christensen is returning as Mr. White. I have called it a follow-up for your convenience.--Valkyrie Red (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Today's Featured Article: NotificationThis is to inform you that S&M (song), which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 7 March 2015. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 10:20, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/A Young Woman standing at a Virginal
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Hogarth's broken marriage vows
Casino Royale (novel)Working on it now in my sandbox. Sorry, I'm behind in my work. - Dank (push to talk) 15:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
The Fourteen InfalliblesDear @SchroCat:, I nominated this article for featured article, would u pls help us to make it a featured article? With my great thanks.Salman mahdi (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/The incredible small-headed horse
Tim Page (presumably)Hi. Why do you let somebody who is an obsessive fan of Jackie Evancho and who has publicly called me 'a thoughtless, nasty fellow' serve as the last word on my biography? This seems unfair to me. The person who wrote the previous edit before SSilvers seemed balanced and noted that I had spoken warmly of a lot of other young artists, naming several of them. This SSilvers has been trying to sum up my whole career by one article for the past two years, and it just isn't the truth. I've published many thousands of articles and championed a lot of young artists. Please read both entries dispassionately and I think you will agree. I was shocked to come upon this today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitegap (talk • contribs) 18:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
All set -- but it will need some technical work from your end to put the sources in Misplaced Pages style. Thanks much for the help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitegap (talk • contribs) 19:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Pretty sure I gave you all you need. Thanks again. Kind of cool to know how this is done!
I'm sorry -- I didn't mean to be offensive. But please take a look at what was done to the article about me by SSilvers last year, somebody who is ON RECORD as calling me "a thoughtless, nasty fellow". Are these the people you let misrepresent somebody's body of work, on account of a single article? In journalism, we recuse ourselves if we have to evaluate somebody whom we despise, particularly if we are on record as having insulted them. And I've been attacked before in a manner similar to this (not, I don't believe, by SS). You may know this already, but a rather distinguished public servant was once claimed to have been a party to both Kennedy assassinations on Misplaced Pages (!!!) although I agree with my colleague and friend Andrew Lih that the site has come a long way since then. In any event, bygones are bygones -- and thanks for teaching me how to use Misplaced Pages. It's been rather fascinating! Cheers and best wishes -- TP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitegap (talk • contribs) 22:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC) I also just now attempted to remove my comment about vandalism but I don't know enough about how to use the site to accomplish this. Feel free to do it yourself if you'd like -- my computer skills are not very good! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitegap (talk • contribs) 22:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Your turn this time, buddy! Somebody has come along and mangled the thing, even ignoring "Day With Timmy Page." Now you can see why I was a little unhappy. Somebody will write a complete and thorough entry in the next few days -- in the meantime, please get rid of this nonsense. Cheers -- TP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitegap (talk • contribs) 01:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC) I will have a scholar write a long entry in the next few days. In the meantime, check out this insanity. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Tim_Page_%28music_critic%29&diff=647954959&oldid=647954201 Again, as always, trying to stay out of this myself, but somebody must protect those who cannot defend themselves. Fix this and we're cool. Cheers -- Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitegap (talk • contribs) 01:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC) Here is the reference to "Day With Timmy Page." https://www.fandor.com/films/a_day_with_filmmaker_timmy_page Forgive me if I seem intense on this stuff, but I'm annoyed that my life is being slimed by a few people. As I stated above ==You may know this already, but a rather distinguished public servant was once claimed to have been a party to both Kennedy assassinations on Misplaced Pages (!!!) although I agree with my colleague and friend Andrew Lih that the site has come a long way since then." Um, well, I guess you DON'T, so I have to stand up. Let me know. No copies to anybody at present! Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitegap (talk • contribs) 01:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 February 2015
Same to you Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. I'm the one adding new material, and corrections of grammar / spelling / syntax / lexis/ fact / style; you're the one automatically blindly reverting. -- Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Fri 21:42, wikitime= 13:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC) |
— 
