| Revision as of 14:43, 24 February 2015 editMozad655 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users812 edits →You edited without source.: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:56, 24 February 2015 edit undoPBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 edits →General sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Please change back Tuz Khurmatu and Jalawla. There are shia millitia there whether we like it or not. ] (]) 14:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC) | Please change back Tuz Khurmatu and Jalawla. There are shia millitia there whether we like it or not. ] (]) 14:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == General sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A ] has authorised the use of ] for pages related to the ] and the ]. The details of these sanctions are described ]. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a ''']''', as described ]. | |||
| ] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | |||
| | icon size = 50px}} | |||
| The page ] come under these General sanctions and include a one revert in 24 hours rule (see ] for more details). You are in breach of the 1RR rule and could be blocked. However I do not like to block people without warning them first. So you have now been warned. -- ] (]) 15:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:56, 24 February 2015
You edited without source.
Please change back Tuz Khurmatu and Jalawla. There are shia millitia there whether we like it or not. Mozad655 (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
General sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
The page Module:Iraqi insurgency detailed map come under these General sanctions and include a one revert in 24 hours rule (see WP:3RR for more details). You are in breach of the 1RR rule and could be blocked. However I do not like to block people without warning them first. So you have now been warned. -- PBS (talk) 15:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)