Misplaced Pages

Talk:Mohammad Ali Bogra: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:12, 1 March 2015 editSamudrakula (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,541 edits Mohammad Ali Bogra← Previous edit Revision as of 00:15, 2 March 2015 edit undoRainmaker23 (talk | contribs)1,160 edits Mohammad Ali BograNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
Once again, tell me the difference between ] (a royal title) and ] (a good surname). Once again, tell me the difference between ] (a royal title) and ] (a good surname).
Families like the ], the ], ] never use such Tittles. Just because his family claim, we cannot ignore government documents, encyclopedia and Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions.——] (]) 21:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC) Families like the ], the ], ] never use such Tittles. Just because his family claim, we cannot ignore government documents, encyclopedia and Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions.——] (]) 21:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
:How was the ] not entitled to use the term Nawab? I think you're a terrible POV pusher. These families were legal entities under British rule, which enjoyed the privilege of titles including Nawab, Nawab Begum, Nawabzada, Shahebzada etc. In any case, ''Mohammad Ali of Bogra'' is not a royal title. Its a commoner name for someone associated with the former aristocracy. His surname his Ali.
:And stop pointing to naming conventions you understand nothing about. Estates were legal aristocratic entities during the Raj and different from Zamindar families.--] (]) 00:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:15, 2 March 2015

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBangladesh Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
The article falls into the work area of the History workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh
WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:
WikiProject iconPakistan
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mohammad Ali Bogra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nearly all references, citations and sources prefer to call Mohammad Ali by his name in full, Mohammad Ali Bogra. Like other Zamindars in Indian subcontinent he was never entitled the title of prince (of bogra). The Nawab Estate was also abolished in 1952 under the East Bengal Estate Acquisition and Tenancy Act (1950). People Who Have Absolutely No Idea What Peerage; Title and Order of precedence are, please use Find sources buttons above and of course wikipedia link. Then you may start RfC---Samudrakula (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Zamindars did not enjoy titles. But all Nawab and Maharaja families- estates and princely states- were entitled. And yes titles were abolished in 1952. But what title do you exactly see in Mohammad Ali of Bogra? It's a name, added with an ancestral town lineage. As I said, this is how he spelled it, and its verified by his son. I find several sources, including the John F Kennedy Library, which uses Mohammad Ali (Bogra).--Rainmaker23 (talk) 18:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I think you should learn more about Royal and noble ranks. see Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)

Seriously, Can't you see the difference between

  • Mohammad Ali Bogra (surname: Ali Bogra; Bogra added to honor his ancestral home district)
  • Mohammad Ali of Bogra (Ali of Bogra or XY of Bogra: a Title that may be inherited by all legitimate heirs; only appropriate for a hereditary prince or reigning monarch, not for aristocrat or Zamindar(certainly many zamindars also titled as nawab))

Once again, tell me the difference between Maud of Wales (a royal title) and Jimmy Wales (a good surname). Families like the Dhaka Nawab Family, the Prithimpassa Family, Singranatore Family never use such Tittles. Just because his family claim, we cannot ignore government documents, encyclopedia and Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions.——Samudrakula (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

How was the Dhaka Nawab Family not entitled to use the term Nawab? I think you're a terrible POV pusher. These families were legal entities under British rule, which enjoyed the privilege of titles including Nawab, Nawab Begum, Nawabzada, Shahebzada etc. In any case, Mohammad Ali of Bogra is not a royal title. Its a commoner name for someone associated with the former aristocracy. His surname his Ali.
And stop pointing to naming conventions you understand nothing about. Estates were legal aristocratic entities during the Raj and different from Zamindar families.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 00:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Categories: