Revision as of 21:12, 1 March 2015 editSamudrakula (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,541 edits →Mohammad Ali Bogra← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:15, 2 March 2015 edit undoRainmaker23 (talk | contribs)1,160 edits →Mohammad Ali BograNext edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Once again, tell me the difference between ] (a royal title) and ] (a good surname). | Once again, tell me the difference between ] (a royal title) and ] (a good surname). | ||
Families like the ], the ], ] never use such Tittles. Just because his family claim, we cannot ignore government documents, encyclopedia and Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions.——] (]) 21:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC) | Families like the ], the ], ] never use such Tittles. Just because his family claim, we cannot ignore government documents, encyclopedia and Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions.——] (]) 21:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:How was the ] not entitled to use the term Nawab? I think you're a terrible POV pusher. These families were legal entities under British rule, which enjoyed the privilege of titles including Nawab, Nawab Begum, Nawabzada, Shahebzada etc. In any case, ''Mohammad Ali of Bogra'' is not a royal title. Its a commoner name for someone associated with the former aristocracy. His surname his Ali. | |||
:And stop pointing to naming conventions you understand nothing about. Estates were legal aristocratic entities during the Raj and different from Zamindar families.--] (]) 00:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:15, 2 March 2015
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Mohammad Ali Bogra
Nearly all references, citations and sources prefer to call Mohammad Ali by his name in full, Mohammad Ali Bogra. Like other Zamindars in Indian subcontinent he was never entitled the title of prince (of bogra). The Nawab Estate was also abolished in 1952 under the East Bengal Estate Acquisition and Tenancy Act (1950). People Who Have Absolutely No Idea What Peerage; Title and Order of precedence are, please use Find sources buttons above and of course wikipedia link. Then you may start RfC---Samudrakula (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Zamindars did not enjoy titles. But all Nawab and Maharaja families- estates and princely states- were entitled. And yes titles were abolished in 1952. But what title do you exactly see in Mohammad Ali of Bogra? It's a name, added with an ancestral town lineage. As I said, this is how he spelled it, and its verified by his son. I find several sources, including the John F Kennedy Library, which uses Mohammad Ali (Bogra).--Rainmaker23 (talk) 18:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- I think you should learn more about Royal and noble ranks. see Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)
Seriously, Can't you see the difference between
- Mohammad Ali Bogra (surname: Ali Bogra; Bogra added to honor his ancestral home district)
- Mohammad Ali of Bogra (Ali of Bogra or XY of Bogra: a Title that may be inherited by all legitimate heirs; only appropriate for a hereditary prince or reigning monarch, not for aristocrat or Zamindar(certainly many zamindars also titled as nawab))
Once again, tell me the difference between Maud of Wales (a royal title) and Jimmy Wales (a good surname). Families like the Dhaka Nawab Family, the Prithimpassa Family, Singranatore Family never use such Tittles. Just because his family claim, we cannot ignore government documents, encyclopedia and Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions.——Samudrakula (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- How was the Dhaka Nawab Family not entitled to use the term Nawab? I think you're a terrible POV pusher. These families were legal entities under British rule, which enjoyed the privilege of titles including Nawab, Nawab Begum, Nawabzada, Shahebzada etc. In any case, Mohammad Ali of Bogra is not a royal title. Its a commoner name for someone associated with the former aristocracy. His surname his Ali.
- And stop pointing to naming conventions you understand nothing about. Estates were legal aristocratic entities during the Raj and different from Zamindar families.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 00:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Stub-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Bangladesh articles
- Low-importance Bangladesh articles
- Help of History Workgroup of Bangladesh needed
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- Unassessed Pakistan articles
- Unknown-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles