| Revision as of 11:48, 12 March 2015 editTheduinoelegy (talk | contribs)220 edits →Arbitration enforcement block← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:50, 12 March 2015 edit undoTheduinoelegy (talk | contribs)220 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| Due to your disruptive behavior on ] I'm imposing upon you a 90 day ban on all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed per ]. ] <small>]</small> 04:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | Due to your disruptive behavior on ] I'm imposing upon you a 90 day ban on all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed per ]. ] <small>]</small> 04:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| : |
:: And you view me sending an e-mail disagreeing with your decision to be relate. Sure. Sure. I believe the phrase is 'Little-Hitler'.] (]) 11:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::Posting your complaints in the log of ] will have no effect on your situation. If you want to appeal your topic ban, you can fill out {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}} and post it at ]. The appeal procedure is given in ]. Thank you, ] (]) 03:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::No. This is bureaucratic nonsense. I edited in the utmost good-faith to bring balance to an article that is very clearly not balanced. It is pretty obvious that there is white-knighting going on, combined with massive group-think that is causing the article on Anita Sarkeensian to fail in the most basic standards of impartiality. My desire was to draw attention to this before similar behaviour explodes all over Misplaced Pages. I have no faith that an appeal would be fairly or promptly heard. This process is intended to kick things into the long-grass. I don't see how waiting 90 days to have an appeal heard is any different from waiting 90 days for the ban to be auto-lifted. You don't work for local government by any chance, do you?] (]) 14:18, 26 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification == | |||
| You are hereby notified of the existance of , a request for enforcement of your topic ban. ] (]) 16:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : You are hereby notified that, as I am King of Misplaced Pages, you are my servant and will do as I please ;).] (]) 16:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::May I suggest that you stop making ] like and ? Frankly your best bet to avoid being blocked is to disengage and completely avoid the topic area you have been banned from. The arbitration topic ban is a pretty real thing and it is strictly enforced. ] 17:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Do you disagree with the truth of the added statements? If they are true then they do not disrupt Misplaced Pages, which is as project aimed at bringing truth to the people, is it not?] (]) 17:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Using talk pages == | |||
| The appropriate place to converse with other users is on their talk page, not their user pages. In edit, you edited my user page - ]. You should have, instead, edited ], my user-talk page. Hope that helps! ] (]) 16:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : Says who?] (]) 16:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :: Please stop editing other user's user pages. This is disruptive, and will lead to your being blocked. Thanks. ] (]) 17:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Okay final warning. If you continue to act disruptively I will block your account without further notice. ] 17:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : Read, ''disagree with supposedly established hierarchy'' for 'act disruptively'.] (]) 17:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Read it any way you like. Regarding your question about truth, you may want to look at ]. You are not the first person to come here demanding your version of truth he heard. ] 17:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : So you are actually saying that you don't give a **** if things said on Misplaced Pages are true...] (]) 17:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| If you had read the link I gave you then you would understand Misplaced Pages's position on truth. I won't paraphrase the essay for you, you can read it if you like. ] 17:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : Who is 'Misplaced Pages'?] (]) 17:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration enforcement block == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] and for breaching your ], per ], you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''one week'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] (specifically ]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the ] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 22:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC) <hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a ]: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
| : No. This decision is not democratic and is outside the rules of Misplaced Pages. You are abusing your powers. I will not abide by your decision.] (]) 23:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| *I have removed your ability to send emails using Misplaced Pages's EmailUser function. If you make disruptive comments on your talk page your access to it will be revoked and your block may be extended. Also, given your comment above, if you ] by editing logged out or with another account your block will likely be extended and the IP address or account you use will also be blocked. The instructions to appeal the block are listed above. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 03:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : By distruptive you literally just mean 'disagree with me/another mod'. Literally that's what you mean.] (]) 11:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:50, 12 March 2015
Welcome!
Hello, Theduinoelegy, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 20:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Fish
Well, I have written only five articles on fish. I would suggest you visit a page of our Ukrainian fish expert though, @Ykvach:)--Mishae (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
November 2014
Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
KonveyorBelt 22:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
GG ARBCOM notice
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Template:Z33 This notice is just FYI, but you are also close to WP:3RR currently on Anita Sarkeesian. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Mentioned at WP:AE
See WP:AE#Edit war at Anita Sarkeesian. You may reply there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 04:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Topic ban
Due to your disruptive behavior on Anita Sarkeesian I'm imposing upon you a 90 day ban on all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed per Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate. Dreadstar ☥ 04:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- And you view me sending an e-mail disagreeing with your decision to be relate. Sure. Sure. I believe the phrase is 'Little-Hitler'.Theduinoelegy (talk) 11:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)